B1G not expected to be great at the top, but there will be a lot of good to very good teams. Wouldn't be surprised if no team wins more than 14-15 conference games.Not the strongest showing...
The Cornhuskers are coming off only their second NCAA Tournament bid since 1998. This was a sweet story last season, but the bounce-back could be difficult. Keisei Tominaga's off conquering the world these days; the sport will miss him so. Critically, Rienk Mast is out for the season because of a knee injury.
That lowers NU's ceiling due to Mast's vastly underrated skillset. Look for returnees Brice Williams and Juwan Gary to be high-leverage, positionless-type players, though maximizing their success could be attached to Utah transfer point guard Rollie Worster, who missed much of last season to injury.
Oops...UCLA is 16 there... was gonna say... that's nuts! Really talented team.
I think it's because we typically are a nonfactor in the conference and then add a bunch of players that nobody in the conference knows about....leaves people to believe we aren't going to be very good.admo said:I cannot believe this year's new look team is being rated so low - like everywhere.
Maybe it's because of an unknown factor with so many new players in a rotation. And Mast was solid, but that production can be replaced. And since we have 2 solid PGs this year, and added players with better shooting skill..... I think we are being overlooked.
And that's fine. Might take a few weeks to get them flowing together. But ultimately, I think we have a better team that last year. And we made the NCAA tournament last year.
So yeah, I am truly excited and looking forward to this new team.
All the computer rankings I've seen have us starting in the mid-40's to mid-50's. I think that's a pretty good starting point based on who we lost & who we gained.I think it's because we typically are a nonfactor in the conference and then add a bunch of players that nobody in the conference knows about....leaves people to believe we aren't going to be very good.
I think we will be better than what they have us. How much better is the question.
Wow.ECisGod said:
Based on every other computer ranking, it seems a bit high. Everyone else has them in the mid-40's to mid-50's.My thoughts also. Hopefully they are right!