runningblind
All-American
2046 here we come! #programbuilder
Iowa isn't on there so I approve.
2046 here we come! #programbuilder
Colorado is and it's before Nebraska so I reject it.Iowa isn't on there so I approve.
UCLA at #9? Yeah, if you want a private dining room.
What makes a college football stadium great?
It can be the architecture, sure, and some beautiful scenery doesn’t hurt. But in building a list of the top 25 FBS stadiums by surveying college football writers and editors at The Athletic, it’s clear that what makes venues most memorable are the atmospheres and vibes they facilitate, whether 100,000-plus people are in attendance in Death Valley, at the Big House or in a White Out or less than half as many are in the stands amid leafy settings in West Point, N.Y., and Boone, N.C.
9. Rose Bowl, UCLA
Capacity:
91,136
Opened:
1923
Big Ten teams can complain about the mileage, but no one deserves pity for a trip that ends beneath the San Gabriel Mountains. If it really amounts to suffering, it has to be the most scenic misery imaginable — where light melts into gold and even a busted coverage appears cinematic. You might park on the edge of a golf course, drink sweating in your hand and grill smoke curling into dry air. By kickoff, mountains blush purple and light gilds every row.
A stadium that feels dug out of earth, the Rose Bowl is California at its purest — sun-faded, stubbornly beautiful and caught in the illusion of perpetuity. Anywhere else, sure … but there’s no justifying travel whining for a trip to Pasadena. Yes, for UCLA home games, not just the Rose Bowl Game itself. — Ira Gorawara
They have actually won a natty before, so that's more believable.Colorado is and it's before Nebraska so I reject it.
UCLA at #9? Yeah, if you want a private dining room.
UCLA at #9? Yeah, if you want a private dining room.
PSU and ND are not too high...UCLA is not the Rose Bowl...the Rose Bowl is top 5, a UCLA home game is just a bit below watching in my garageCalling BS on a lot of these. PSU, ND, and UCLA are all too high.
1/2 a title with Georgia Tech.They have actually won a natty before, so that's more believable.
While I agree, if you start saying that then we only have 4 1/2 also.1/2 a title with Georgia Tech.

Let's keep the misogynistic takes out of the board, please. That's a raw and emotional take, not a logical one. There's no evidence to suggest the refs' genders influenced their ability to do their jobs.
Also:
We do - that's what the Report button is for. It's a lot more helpful than taking shots at the board.
Welcome back.