SandhillshuskerW
-
Posts
763 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Media Demo
Posts posted by SandhillshuskerW
-
-
3 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:
Absolutely totally against it for one reason. It would require every single game to have yet another person running the clock. Some schools have would have issues finding people to do it. AND...then to find someone who actually does it well.
Seems to me to be a recipe for a mess.
I agree with you. There would be so many schools that would have someone running the shot clock that would forget to reset it or do it at the wrong time. It would be an absolute disaster at a lot of schools.
-
There is a lot of discussion going around about this. Do you think that there needs to be a shot clock in high school basketball? I coach and I will say that there are very few times when a shot clock would have even come in to play. The only time that it would matter would be at the end of a close game when a team wants to stall. What are your thoughts?
-
17 hours ago, SouthLincoln Husker said:
I do not know if I would go that far, but if they put Winston on the floor with the non starters then I would agree with you.
Our boys have quit on Miles from what I've seen and we have a few injuries. I really don't see much to give me any kind of confidence in a guaranteed win if Michigan State rested everyone. I've been wrong many times in my life though, so it's possible that I'm wrong about this.
-
Michigan State could probably rest all of their starters and still beat us at this point. I'm still going to watch the game tomorrow night, but I'm not expecting much at this point.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, teachercd said:
Wait, Maggie is gone gone?
I have no idea if she's gone gone. I just know that she just started up that other show and she might be gone gone. I don't know that they ever really said where she went on the show though.
-
On 2/18/2019 at 8:28 AM, teachercd said:
Ratings are still really high. Last night was cool.
Finally got to watch it last night. I thought it was a very good episode. I think things are going to get crazy with the Whisperers. I just wish Rick and Maggie were still on the show. I think it would make it more interesting.
-
-
Bumping this and just asking for a few seconds of your time. www.greatbikegiveaway.com Please click on Carter Weems and vote. He's in first place in his bike category right now.
-
34 minutes ago, TheGainfulHusker said:
Hope he gets the bike!
Thanks, we appreciate all the help we can get!
-
I shared this in a status update, but I thought I would start a thread. If you would like to, please go to www.greatbikegiveaway.com and vote for my son to receive a free adaptive bike. His name is Carter Weems and he has Angelman's Syndrome. This bike would help us to include him in family outings better. You will need either a Facebook or a Twitter account to be able to vote I think. If you happen to be looking for a charity to donate to this tax refund season, this would be a great place to start. There are so many kids on this site that are deserving of a bike and these bikes can be quite expensive to purchase. If you would like to, please share this with as many people as you can and get people voting for Carter. Thanks!
-
2
-
-
It's finally back this weekend. I know that some people have stopped watching the show, but I just can't give up on it now. I think the second half of the season is going to be a good one.
-
This might be more relevant, they also averaged each conferences recruiting ranking and winning % ranking out and concluded this:
Recruiting Ranking Winning % Ranking
SEC Avg. 19.14 (1st) Avg. 28.69 (1st)
Pac 12 Avg. 34 (2nd) Avg. 35.54 (4th)
Big 12 Avg. 37.25 (3rd) Avg. 31.1 (2nd)
Big 10 Avg. 38.29 (4th) Avg. 34.54 (3rd)
ACC Avg. 39.29 (5th) Avg. 36.32 (5th)
This makes it look like the Pac 12 is the conference that is really not getting the maximum out of their recruits.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Mavric said:
Great info. Thanks for sharing.
However, I’m not sure the conference info is very useful. The issue is that teams in the same conference play each other a lot so that is going to move the overall winning percentage towards .500 no matter how good or bad the team has done in recruiting. Thus, since the SEC has usually been ranked higher in the recruiting rankings, they are bound to move down in winning percentage. And since the Big XII has generally been relatively low in the recruiting rankings, that makes it easier for them to move up.
So I don’t think the conference data is very useful but the individual team info is very interesting.
I told them that I thought it would be better if they could just use the non-conference games to see winning percentage vs recruiting rankings. However, you would also get in to how strong teams non-conference schedules are compared to other conferences.
-
They also concluded this about the conferences:
The Big 12 ranked #1 because they averaged being up 6.8 spots
The Big 10 ranked #2 by averaging being up 4.65 spots
The ACC ranked #3 by averaging being up 2.82 spots
The Pac-12 ranked #4 by averaging being down 2.5 spots
The SEC ranked #5 by averaging being down 10.71 spots
The Big 12 seems to get the most out of their recruits as a conference and the SEC seems to get the least out of their recruits by far as a conference. I don't know if it has to do with coaching, or if the recruit ranking system is flawed a little. Maybe a little bit of both.
-
1
-
-
There are definitely some teams that achieve at a much higher percentage than they should compared to their recruiting rank such as Wisconsin. I found it interesting that the SEC is all down, with the exception of Alabama.
-
I am a high school math teacher and I had two of my stats kids do a project that focused on compiling data and using averages to make comparisons. They chose to use college football recruiting over the last 10 years, not counting this year since it's not done yet. They used 247 Sports and Rivals to average out the recruiting classes rank and then they figured out the winning percentage of all the teams over the last 10 years. They wanted to see if there was a correlation between the two. They ranked the 64 teams from the power 5 conferences and Notre Dame from 1-65 in recruiting and 1-65 in winning percentage. It was interesting to see which teams seem to be performing a lot higher than their recruiting rank and a lot lower. For the difference category, they put whether the team performed better or worse compared to their recruiting ranking. For example: Illinois ranked 55th in recruiting over the last ten years combined, but their winning percentage ranks 62nd so they are down 7 spots from where they should have been. Please let me know what you think of their findings and I will pass your comments on to them. Thanks
Team Recruiting Avg. Winning % Recruiting Rank Winning % Rank Difference
Illinois 53.1 34.96 55 62 Down 7
Indiana 51.8 36.89 53 61 Down 8
Iowa 44.9 63.08 47 22/23 Up 24.5
Maryland 36 39.52 34 58 Down 24
Michigan 16.7 63.28 15 21 Down 6
Michigan State 28.6 68.94 27 13 Up 14
Minnesota 51.9 48.03 54 48 Up 6
Nebraska 23.8 61.07 22 28 Down 6
Northwestern 57.3 59.69 62 32 Up 30
Ohio State 6.1 85.82 2 2 Even
Penn State 23 67.44 21 15 Up 6
Purdue 57.8 34.38 64 63 Up 1
Rutgers 46.9 44.8 48 51-53 Down 4
Wisconsin 42.8 75.5 44 6 Up 38
Alabama 1.9 90.71 1 1 Even
Arkansas 27.7 50.79 26 45 Down 19
Auburn 9.5 65.15 7 17 Down 10
Florida 10.2 64.84 8 18 Down 10
Georgia 7.9 71.1 6 12 Down 6
Kentucky 36.7 44.8 36 51-53 Down 16
LSU 6.4 75.19 5 7 Down 2
Ole Miss 20.7 52 20 42 Down 22
Miss. State 28.8 60.47 28 29-30 Down 1.5
Missouri 36.5 60.47 35 29-30 Down 6.5
South Carolina 17.8 62.31 17 24 Down 7
Tennessee 13.1 49.6 12 47 Down 35
Texas A&M 14.9 63.08 13 22-23 Down 9.5
Vanderbilt 48.2 41.6 50 55 Down 5
Boston College 56.3 46.83 59 49 Up 10
Clemson 15.6 80.58 14 3 Up 11
Duke 54.8 49.61 58 46 Up 12
Florida State 6.2 72.93 4 9 Down 5
Georgia Tech 49.5 56.92 51 35 Up 16
Louisville 40.4 60.16 40 31 Up 9
Miami 16.7 56.2 16 37 Down 21
NC State 44.7 56.25 46 36 Up 10
North Carolina 26.6 53.54 25 40 Down 15
Pitt 42.6 54.62 42 38 Up 4
Syracuse 57 45.97 61 50 Up 11
Virginia 42.8 37.4 43 59-60 Down 16.5
Virginia Tech 24.9 64.66 24 19 Up 5
Wake Forest 59.2 41.13 65 56 Up 9
Arizona 43.9 52.34 45 41 Up 4
Arizona State 33.9 53.91 30 39 Down 9
California 35.5 43.53 33 54 Down 21
Colorado 53.8 33.87 56 64 Down 8
Oregon 19.3 75 19 8 Up 11
Oregon State 49.8 37.4 52 59-60 Down 7.5
Stanford 24.4 76.12 23 5 Up 18
UCLA 18.3 51.94 18 43 Down 25
USC 6.1 66.41 3 16 Down 13
Utah 38.1 63.57 39 20 Up 19
Washington 29.6 62.12 29 25 Up 4
Washington State 47.4 44.8 49 51-53 Down 3
Baylor 37.8 59.38 38 33 Up 5
Iowa State 56.6 40.8 60 57 Up 3
Kansas 53.8 19.16 56 65 Down 9
Kansas State 57.4 61.72 63 26-27 Up 36.5
Oklahoma 11.8 78.95 10 4 Up 6
Oklahoma State 34.3 72.31 32 10.5 Up 22.5
TCU 34 72.31 31 10.5 Up 21.5
Texas 10.7 58.91 9 34 Down 25
Texas Tech 40.7 51.59 41 44 Down 3
West Virginia 37.2 61.72 37 26-27 Up 10.5
Notre Dame 12.5 67.97 11 14 Down 3
-
2
-
-
Here's the way I look at the remaining 15 games, and this is obviously just my opinion.
The next 5 games are @Indiana, vs Michigan State, @Rutgers, vs Ohio State and vs Wisconsin. I feel like we need to win 3 out of 5 here. There is no way we are winning against Michigan State in my opinion so we need to win 3 out of the other 4.
The next 5 games after that are @Illinois, vs Maryland, @Purdue, vs Minnesota and vs Northwestern. I feel like we need to win 4 our of this 5 since we have 3 home games and we go to Illinois.
The last 5 games are @Penn State, vs Purdue, @Michigan, @Michigan State and vs Iowa. I think we need to win 3 out of 5 here with obvious losses @Michigan and @Michigan State.
That would leave our record at 22-9 going in to the conference tournament. If we could win a couple of games in the tournament I think we have a good chance of making it in. The way we look lately though, I'm not sure if everything is possible that I laid out.
-
7 minutes ago, macroboy said:
Get a room nerds........
-
4
-
1
-
-
20 hours ago, Dewiz said:
Last day to vote only takes 10 seconds
Did she win?
-
Voted, good luck to you!
-
1
-
-
We have 22 commits right now. How many of them are planning on signing next week? Does anyone have any idea, or are we going to have to wait and see? I know that not all of them are planning on enrolling right away, but I hope they all sign at least.
-
I have no idea if conferences are going to try to get to 16, but if they all do here is what I would like to see. The Big 12 would definitely be the worst conference overall in this scenario and I only added Oklahoma State to us because then it helps us get Oklahoma in my opinion.
Big 10: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Wisconsin, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Notre Dame and Kansas. Bold teams would be in the West division and you could pod from there.
SEC: Alabama, Arkansas, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, LSU, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Tennessee, Vanderbilt, South Carolina, Missouri, Texas A&M, UCF and South Florida. The last two were added because they would need to be two teams that joined a power 5 conference possibly and they are located in a good area to join the SEC. Bold teams would be West division.
ACC: Boston College, Clemson, Duke, Florida State, Miami, NC State, North Carolina, Pitt, Syracuse, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Wake Forest, Louisville, Georgia Tech, Maryland and Rutgers. Maryland and Rutgers would work for the ACC and might fit ok. Bold teams would be one division.
Pac 12: Arizona, Arizona State, California, Oregon, Oregon State, Stanford, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington, Washington State, Colorado, Boise State, San Diego State, Fresno State and Nevada. The last 4 would have to be added and I think they would be the best fit for where they are. Bold teams would be North division.
Big 12: Baylor, Iowa State, Kansas State, TCU, Texas Tech, Texas, West Virginia, Houston, Colorado State, Northern Illinois, Cincinnati, Memphis, App. State, SMU, BYU and Temple. This was the toughest conference to figure out and add teams to. I could see a North and South division here with the teams in bold being the North.
This is obviously just my opinion and I was messing around with the teams quite a bit. The teams that I added could obviously be switched out for other teams.
-
6 minutes ago, teachercd said:
There is a lot of season left but you have to start doing the math...
10 conference home games: Do they go 10-0? Maybe, but probably 9-1? So that is 9 wins...
10 conference road games: Do they go 0-10? Probably not but I could see...5-5?
So that is 14 wins...which will get them into the dance with wiggle room being 3 games (I think they get in with 11 conference wins)
They also have 4 more non-conference games. Let's say they go 3-1 with those. 7 wins currently + 12 that you mentioned above + 3 that I mentioned would be a record of 22-9. Then you have to see what we would do in the B1G tournament. I would hope that would get us in, but it would all depend on who all we would beat.
Edit: My math is slightly off. I think that would be 23-8.
-
3 minutes ago, Moiraine said:
One thing I will say is health care is a far bigger priority and I don’t think anyone should even try with education until everyone can get health care.
I agree
-
1
-
High School Shot Clock
in Other Sports
Posted
The initial cost might be bad for some schools, but I don't really see that as an issue. I've coached at a lot of places that have clock operators that either forget to start the clock or stop the clock quite a bit. I can see a lot of issues with people forgetting to reset the shot clock. I think it would be interesting for someone to watch games next year and keep track of how long it takes teams to actually shoot. I'm guessing that shot clock violations would be very few in high school sports.