ScawFraw

How long were they able to see each practice?

Change my name to ScawFraw pretty please.  It's my new alter ego.

So basically the Kenny Bell block in the B1G championship game against Wisconsin?  

Nice get.  Excited to see where this one goes.  

Question for you guys:  What specific actions has Trump done that would be considered impeachable? 

Why are people freaking out on the "he did not exonerate Trump" line?  It's the job of a prosecutor to look for evidence of a crime, which Mueller did not find any.  That's the important part. 

3 minutes ago, VectorVictor said:

 

Seriously--what successes has Trump had on the jobs front that weren't already initiated or aided by progress/work laid by the Obama Administration?

 

There's already been ample proof that any economic or job gains are merely riding the coattails of the Obama administration--but I have yet to see any proof that Trump, of his own volition and without any momentum from the Obama Administration, brought jobs back to the United States. 

 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2018/10/16/the-trump-manufacturing-jobs-boom-10-times-obamas-over-21-months/#4f1898365850

2 hours ago, Danny Bateman said:

 

The economy is fine, dude. Wealthy people are doing really well. I did hear Forbes said there's less billionaires this year compared to last year and they own slightly less wealth. There go those damn socialists again.

 

Working people are doing marginally better or about the same as always, despite the promises and the dogged Trump supporters who claim their income has skyrocketed thanks to tax relief.

 

I'll ask you: Is the economy continuing to do well worth all the corruption and graft and greed and hubris and illegality of this administration? Because Hillary likely would have done similar things for the economy. I'd contend working schmoes would probably be better off.

I'm sure she would not have done this well.  Jobs needed to be brought back to the US, and Trump was the man to do it.  

9 hours ago, Danny Bateman said:

 

She wouldn't have been as openly, smugly corrupt, no.

 

She would've been more like normal politician corrupt. Which would be an improvement.

 

And, she'd, you know, know what she was doing, and junk. There was a time when that mattered.

So how's the economy doing?  

9 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

Welcome to America. 

 

 

Is this an impeachable offense?

7 hours ago, VectorVictor said:

 

Yes, your post was, yet you still felt the need to inconvenience those electrons and steal a second of our lives. 

Really?  

9 hours ago, knapplc said:

The post below this one will accurately describe the last two years with Trump.

So Hillary would have been better?

Waste of time.

1 minute ago, knapplc said:

 

 

FYI:

 

 

 

 

Well, what more needs evaluated I wonder.

1 minute ago, knapplc said:

  

Dude. What?

?

1 minute ago, knapplc said:

 

By whom? The Republican-held congress? C'mon.

 

 

They have. So far there are convictions and/or cooperation by Trump's:

 

Campaign Chairman

Lawyer

National Security Advisor

Campaign Staffer

Campaign Advisor

 

What do you think has been going on the past two years?

 

 

 

Well,  hopefully we can agree that the economy is growing.  All we hear is the bad/"fake news" about Trump.  I honestly want to know more about the good he's done.

3 minutes ago, knapplc said:

 

 

Nixon was going to be impeached on Obstruction of Justice, Abuse of Power, and Contempt of Congress.  Trump fits all of those right now.

 

 

 

If that was true, he would have been impeached by now or at least begun the first stages of impeachment.

6 minutes ago, Cdog923 said:

 

Still waiting for your response to this, @RedNebraskan

Probably not many.  But it would be the exact opposite by congress if there was someone defending Trump. 

16 minutes ago, Moiraine said:

 

 

There is plenty of evidence to impeach Trump. The evidence isn’t the hard part. 

Really? Like what?

1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said:

 

I'm more than willing to say both Cohen and Trump are pieces of crap.  How do you feel about every single person that comes out of Trump's inner circle tells the same types of stories?

I have a lot of thoughts about that, but I'm sure they aren't true.  I guess what it comes down for me is that this Russian collusion thing doesn't seem to have any real evidence, and that's what they've been hanging their hats on this whole time.

1 minute ago, NM11046 said:

Not necessarily - but certainly the items he has brought as evidence that support his comments most likely did.  

 

And then why aren't the R's drilling down to what he is saying today to prove him wrong?  They're scared to go there.

Honestly, at this point in this, I don't really know who to believe.  The thing is though: What's the goal of all of this?  Is it to impeach? Because if so, I don't think they have the evidence for that.

1 minute ago, NM11046 said:

How do you feel about the fact that not one R has questioned whether his testimony is true?  They're snowing you by talking about his past lies instead of acknowledging the issues and evidence that they're there to discuss today.  Don't fall for it.  They're yelling "squirrel".

So everything Cohen says today actually happened? 

3 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

 

So, you believe that anyone who has ever been caught in a lie or deception can not be trusted with telling the truth.

 

Is that your opinion?

No.  But the level of scrutiny the Republicans face in the media?  There's no level of consistency.  If we are to hold some people to certain standards, but not others, that's what I don't agree with.

1 minute ago, NM11046 said:

Are you actually watching the hearing?

I am.  

I think the Republicans are right in asking about Cohen's lying and credibility.  And I love when he was asked about recording people, and Cohen said "I don't", then 30 seconds later said "I've recorded about 100 times", plus where's the hard evidence to impeach Trump?  I mean, isn't this the endgame for the Democrats?

58 minutes ago, Cdog923 said:

This is an incredibly embarrassing showing by Republicans. 

Disagree with that.  The Dems have nothing with this testimony, and won't have anything with the Mueller report.