Mrsnerdly55

I'd take #3 I would be curious if this was the same number of games played by all 3. Fumbles would play a big part in my decision but that could be misleading if fewer games.

How fast was Rozier? He'd still be my pick as the best, but that's just my opinion. Like I said, I don't believe the 40 time is the most important thing about a good back. They have to be fast but not a real rocket ship. I agree with Junior about Green, I think he was better than Phillips. He may have been as good or better than Rozier. He did much better in the pros.

Mr. Snerdly

Curious if anyone knows what his 40 time is now. I read on the internet it used to be 4.7 but through hard work and a little weight reduction it is 4.5 something. Don't know if this is right, you can read anything on the internet but he does look quite a bit faster than last year and what I think is more important has better moves. No one ran him down on the 66 yard touchdown. I think too much emphasis is placed on the 40 time. It has to be good but you don't have to be 4.3-4.4 to be an excellent back. I believe Rozier was 4.5 something and in my opinion he was the best Nebraska ever had. I don't think he got run down from behind too often.

Hello. Been reading here quite a while and figured I would join. Pretty good game. Long way to go but they have come a long way. I think it is possible they could win the rest of the games with a few breaks but if they don't at least they are on the right path. Ozigbo really looks like a different player than last year. Good luck to him and the rest of the team.