Jump to content


MNBigRedNorth

Banned
  • Posts

    389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by MNBigRedNorth

  1. 17 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

    :laughpound

     

    Dude,  

     

    You have no clue.  I listened to him daily back then.  I was traveling for my sales job and had him on every day.  Interestingly, he started his national show in the late 80s and one of his main points was how horrible the MSM was and how HE was the only true source of accurate information on what those evil Democrats were doing.  

     

    So, now you claim you haven't trusted the MSM since the late 80s.  So, pardon me if I don't believe you that Rush wasn't the one that convinced you of this.

     

    It took me years to realize the total BS he was spewing.  Long after I had become a Fox News junky.

    Sorry to see that you got corrupted by listening to the MSM.  Ronald Reagan was my many person who woke me up about the MSM and also how the MSM treated Bill and Hillary Clinton during his campaign against old man Bush.  They let him off the hook on his woman problem!

    • Plus1 1
  2. 3 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

    So, about the time Rush told you to not trust them.

    How would you know what Rush says?  I didn't listen to him until years later.  Just happens his thoughts matched mine, and he didn't tell me squat.  Have you ever heard him?  I doubt it, because he would be too conservative for people who call themself Republican but would vote for a commie Democrats because they don't like President Trump.  

    1121483182250110981?s=191121483182250110981?s=191121483182250110981?s=19

    • Plus1 1
  3. 53 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

    You think for yourself but you use all of his catch phrases.  Interesting.

     

    I'm guessing you think less for yourself than you think.  


    He tells you not to trust the MSM because they're "fake news" so you don't.

     

    He tells you they are 18 angry Dems....so you believe that.

     

    etc...etc...etc....

    I haven't trusted the MSM since late in the 1980's and people are sticking their heads in the sand if they think those attorney's were not bias!  If you think they weren't, I have a bridge I'd  like to sell you!  Sounds like some people are too young to even know what a subjective Media is.  MSM has been corrupt for a long time now and many didn't start paying attention until after they were corrupt.

    • Plus1 1
  4. 7 minutes ago, Frott Scost said:

     

    So maybe 6 of them weren't so angry when they wrote it?

    I Only mentioned 12-18 because some of them left during the writing of the report because the investigation was over they were no longer needed.  The second part was solely written most likely by Andrew Weissmann and then he quite so he couldn't be interviewed by the DOJ Inspector General.  Only current employees can be interviewed by the Inspector General. 

    • Plus1 1
  5. 1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said:

    How would you know it can't be disputed.  You refuse to listen to or read anything Trump doesn't want you to listen to or read?

    What would that take for you?

    Well certainly something more than a report written by 12-18 angry Democrat Lawyers (Especially Andrew Weissmann) working for Mueller that all voted for Hillary.  Also an investigation that was started all due to the false premises that were laid out in a unproven dossier paid for by the Clinton Campaign!  Can't anyone see the conflict of interest with this panel of Attorney's? 

    • Plus1 1
  6. 3 minutes ago, commando said:

    they do have their fingers on the pulse of the alt right...so if we want to know how the alt right plans to run the country it's worth reading.

    You know, that's the main reason I post this for everyone here.  If anyone thinks this is to change your minds on things, forget it.  Most people are so set in their thoughts, that to change their minds, it would take a great awakening to happen.  

    • Plus1 1
  7. 28 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

     

    So, everything is a deep state conspiracy other than what the dear leader proclaims to be true.

    Hey you believe what you want from your FAKE sources!  If you think this hasn't happened that's your problem.  In the next few months, if people don't open their eyes, they're going to be left behind!  Lots of discovery and legal stuff is about to happen to these clowns! But again you provide no direct evidence!  Every single time these kinds of thing happen the left CLAIM CONSPIRACY.  The only thing that was a conspiracy was that people who hated President Trump said he was conspiring with the Russians and it was the CIA and FBI under Obama who started all of this along with the help of an unproven Steele Dossier that was bought and mostly paid for by the Clinton Campaign and the DNC.   Investigator are now looking into Hillary's dealing with the Russians.  Also look for something big coming out of the Ukraine concerning Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden.  Big things are coming.  Pay back is going to be hell for the people who started this whole hoax, as it should be.  This should never happen again to any President or any political campaign, no matter which party is in power!  But just keep following the all in fake/MSM/Media Matters news.  At this point their credit-ability is gone and only the people that have drank too much of their Koolaid are watching.  When people do things to cover up the truth, the truth usually comes out and all of this was due because of hatred of Donald J. Trump.  Also doing things out of hate usually doesn't come out good either for the haters.

    • Thanks 1
  8. Check out this segment from the Laura Ingraham show that was aired (Wednesday night). Mike Huckabee filling in for Laura Ingraham.

    Here is the video of most of the show. Solo Rudy interview starts about about 3:00 into the video. Panel with Rudy, Robert Ray, and DiGenova starts at about 10:30 or so. Most important thing DiGenova says — solo report on Comey coming out in about 2 weeks that DiGenova says will contain criminal referrals.

    This might be the best, spot-on discussion of the coup and where things need to go from here. Centered on the FISA abuse. Must watch.

    The hammer will be dropping on these seditious players in the near future!

    • Plus1 1
  9. 8 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

    Question:

     

    If the Republicans are hell bent on Hillary using a private server is so treasonous and they demand that there's even more emails that need to be found and everyone who may have come in contact with them are traders to the state.........do they demand the same for Jared's emails at the same time?

    Big difference is that her emails are highly classified.  Sure Ivanka and Jared's should be on a government server.  I don't think her classification is anything near what a Secretary of States is though.  Hillary's server was compromised several times.  How many government secrets did she give to her masters in China anyway?  But she's Hildabeast Clinton she should get a pass! Also they gave everything to the government when they found out they were in violation.  Hillary bleach bit her hard drive, but now the emails are showing up with most of them stored in the Obama White House!

    • Plus1 1
  10. 2 hours ago, knapplc said:

    The Right-Wing coup of America continues. Republicans are lining up to defend Russia's puppet, Trump, and forgetting to, you know, defend America.

     

     

    A hostile foreign power sought to influence an American election and, rather than disclose that to the FBI, Trump's campaign kept meeting with them.  The American intelligence arm (rightly) investigated, and rather than focusing their rage against the enemy who attacked us (Russia), the Republicans are going after other Americans.

     

     

     

    Can you PROVE that his Election Campaign met with one Russia Government Official (ie: foreign power) during the campaign?  Because the meeting with Don Jr. was an attorney (Natalia Veselnitskaya) from Russia who was working for Hillary Clinton's campaign.  She was later seen at a Clinton Campaign Function.  Total set-up job and once the person wasn't doing what they came to do (which was to give information on Hillary) the stopped the meeting.  https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/02/confirmed-hillary-camp-set-up-trump-tower-meeting-between-russians-and-don-jr-all-russians-involved-are-connected-to-the-clintons/  Barr will be investigating all of Hillary's crap! Boy the FAKE NEWS MSM doesn't do anyone any favors.  But just go ahead and keep believing!

    • Plus1 1
  11. 8 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

    FYI.....I know this is a difficult concept and alt right websites won’t ageee. 

     

    But, the FBI monitoring or looking into a campaign that has secret contact with a foreign enemy is not some form of nefarious “spying”.....as much as you really really really want it to so badly to be. 

     

    Its actually what they should be doing. 

    Obviously some must think the Steel Dossier is is factual!  It's not, and there is the problem. That's why Barr wants to know the origins of the investigation, which leads to nothing!

    • Plus1 1
  12. So now there are post on this thread telling people to stop posting on this thread because that would give the OP validity.  If your posting or not this investigation is happening, no matter if anyone likes it or not.  This investigation has far more validity since many things are already know facts.  Spying on a political campaign by the Obama Administration did happen and the FISA application to spy was backed up by a unverified  dossier which was paid for by candidates that were running against President Trump.  https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/04/10/barr_will_investigate_genesis_of_trump-russia_investigation.html

    • Plus1 1
  13. 22 minutes ago, commando said:

    good lord....so if the "radical left" was in charge and doing wrong...it is only right for the radical right to go overboard and be jsut as wrong in the other direction?   really?   

     

    and for fu#5$ sake.....we didn't give iran american money...we gave them back the money we locked up of theirs after the iran hostage crisis....and they were sueing us to get it back in the world court.    there was a chance the court would have awarded them twice as much as we gave them back.   we essentially settled out of court.  or in trump speak....we signed a NDA with iran 

    Are you completely sure of that claim?  https://mosaicmagazine.com/observation/politics-current-affairs/2016/11/the-story-of-obamas-ransom-payment-to-iran-gets-worse/   Many Jewish people see it quite differently!

    • Plus1 1
  14. 5 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

    Why do you think this was written by only angry democrats?

    Well many of them donated directly to the Clinton Campaign.  https://heavy.com/news/2017/10/robert-mueller-team-democrat-campaign-donation-hillary/   There were only a couple of attorney's there that might have been unbiased.  Andrew Weissmann who is a pit bull of an attorney and who gave money to Hillary, had such conflict of interest, he should never had been considered for this job! He did nothing but slant the whole investigation into fraudulently flipping people in an attempt to get process crimes.  This investigation was just down right sickening!  Call Trump anything you want, but this was sickening!

    • Plus1 1
  15. Just now, BigRedBuster said:

    So in other words...no. 

     

    The right wing propaganda machine has done a fabulous job convincing you they are the only source you should even consider. Great job!!!

     

    and you’re the one in here that preaches that we all should have an open mind to the other side. 

     

    Trump was right about shooting someone on 5th ave. 

    Just your opinion.  I make my views from personal experiences in my everyday life, dealing with social workers, clients at my place of business and contacts in my profession. Do you admit that the MSM is nothing more than the propaganda wing of the DNC and Media Matters?  In essence its treble that we even have to discuss it in these terms.  There are people in high places that thoroughly enjoy seeing our nation divided this way.  I would venture to say most peoples needs and views are really quite similar, but by dividing us, they can more easily control us all!    

    • Plus1 1
  16. 11 minutes ago, TGHusker said:

    Ok - so who/what is your litmus test on what could be a factual investigation and corresponding report?  If the Southern District of NY comes out with indictments against Trump - will you believe them?  If the SC rules against Trump, will you believe them?   Or do you only believe those who agree with your biases?  

    Well that's a good question.  You know having a mixture of people with different political views to do the investigation would be a good start.  How can anyone not see bias and conflict of interest with the simple make up of the investigating lawyers!  That same thing exist in the Southern District of NY also.  How about a using a DOJ District in a swing political area of our country.  Today politicians have weaponized the DOJ and the Obama Team in my view is directly responsible for that. At least it is much more noticeable since he was the POTUS.  Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch were both awful and have some serious explaining to do!

    • Plus1 1
×
×
  • Create New...