30-50 Feral Hogs

3 minutes ago, melscott62 said:

If things go south at any point for frost benning will be the first to jump on him.  

What journalist or radio show host meets your standard of objectivity?

13 minutes ago, Ziebol said:

The fact you listen and believe what Benning says is your problem. 

1 minute ago, Nebfanatic said:

Even if he was sick the coaches said offensive practice looked way better/more focused/ect. I would imagine if the snaps get cleaned up the offense will operate in a way we won't need to blame them if we lose.

Yes.  That is what the coaches have said.  But like someone mentioned earlier, we've heard that coach speak before.  Damon Benning even addressed it on his radio show that Frost had said nothing about bad practices leading up to the USA game and then when the offense didn't perform well, he then came out and blamed (probably too harsh of a word) it on bad practices.  So Benning said that doing this after the fact is only going to go so far.  It was just an observation.

If Nebraska loses, I wonder if we will hear that Martinez was sick at practice for a day or 2 this week.  At least that is what I have heard.

Red meat was making me physically sick within an hour of consumption.  Didn't matter what it was or how lean.  Beef, bison, venison, whatever.  It took me several years to figure this out.  One day I got sick after eating a burger.  So I decided to go a week with no red meat consumption.  I started feeling better.  So I went a month and didn't have any issues.  I'm now almost 2 years without eating red meat and I am in the best shape of my life.  Pork is also considered a red meat.  I've reduced my intake of that as well.  I can't give that up completely because bacon is the best food on the planet.

With regards to diets, I went on a bit journey with my weight at the same time I gave up red meat.  I weighed 217 pounds.  I wasn't fat but I also wasn't carrying the weight properly.  I didn't do any fads.  I basically managed portions, stopped eating late at night, and exercised more.  I dropped to 191 in about 10 months.  It might have happened sooner but I allowed myself to indulge when I felt like I needed to.  especially on weekends.  

After that 10 months and losing the weight, I looked in the mirror and realized that even though I was lighter, I didn't necessarily look better.  I looked thinner, not fitter.  I was listening to a fitness podcast when i took some of their tips to being more fit.  I (try very hard) not to eat carbs after 5PM.  So I changed things up and put on pounds to get back up to the 205-209 range.  I lift more weights than I have in the past, and I do different forms of aerobic and cardio every day.   I'm leaner, stronger, and look fitter than I have ever been.

The one thing that stuck with me in the podcast was they said your weight is whatever you tell someone it is.  It doesn't really matter if you're fit.  You could look at me and I could tell you I weigh 220 and you'd believe me.  I could tell you 195 and you'd believe me.  It's because of how i carry the weight.  

All in all, I plan to eventually go back up to the 220 area.  I'm doing a lot of muscle building training right now so I am consuming more calories in order to feed that.  But now that i am mostly (weekend beers notwithstanding) watching when I eat as opposed to what, within reason, I think I will be able to carry the weight properly and look better doing it.

His name sounds like a B1G trophy.

16 minutes ago, LumberJackSker said:

I'm sure it been mentioned but i don't want to read through everything to find the answer. But when were the guys from the video convicted? Was is before or after Washington sent the video?

One of the boys, as a minor, was given probation for the distribution.  At the time, it was not charged as a sexual assault because the girl did not claim it as such and all parties involved were minors.

1 hour ago, JJ Husker said:

Personally, I give this girl and her mother's account zero credibility. You should have to prove sexual assault or rape before you refer to it as such years later. 

Someone needs to freshen up on why victims don’t always come forward immediately.

Just now, BigRedBuster said:

As someone who has been in a number of bad predicaments with horses.....that hurt watching it.

We don't need to know what goes on in your bedroom

10 minutes ago, PasstheDamnBallGuy said:

 

Ok except that the delaying is standard procedure even if he wast a football player so not sure how that tracks. 

I guess someone could argue that the number and/or length of delays in this particular case has been excessive

5 minutes ago, PasstheDamnBallGuy said:

 

So you are directly admitting that sitting him the whole season would hurt his chance in the case. Interesting 

The insinuation is that the attorneys keep asking for continuances in order to delay anything until after the season so that Washington can play the season without further penalty or missing of practices, games, etc 

3 minutes ago, CapoValley said:

I can’t speak to the others but I do know LP immediately say.  At least I think I know that. 

I'm sure there were some exceptions.  Phillips was likely one

Hell of a thing.  Missouri loses to Wyoming to start the season and they pull a 4 star WR out of Oklahoma.

Just now, CapoValley said:

No one is saying that. 

 

Interestingly though, every player you referenced served a multi game suspension. Some for only misdemeanors. 

If Osborne followed his point system, those suspensions were served after conviction/plea/whatever.  

2 minutes ago, Undone said:

 

He is not at all the victim and that is not at all what he said. But please, let's spend three pages of posts arguing about it.   

 

It was at least 19 pages ago

1 minute ago, Mavric said:

 

Probably did the "I'm going to pull a fourth one out from under the table" trick...

Damn.  Gets me every time

So he's a Missouri commit with 3 hats that are not Missouri?

Just now, ColoradoHusk said:

Not all felonies are created equally here, plus it's likely that Mo's attorneys are doing everything they can to get the felony charge dropped.

I totally agree.  That doesn't mean someone having the opinion that they believe a player shouldn't play while facing charges of one is malformed or wrong.  It's just their opinion

7 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

 

 

 

 

Boy, you really are a piece of work. It's been covered ad nauseum but you still refuse to get it. You leave us no choice but to assume you are incapable of understanding anything beyond your own malformed opinion. Please find something else to do, preferably elsewhere.

 

*goes to user settings, adds another name to the ignore list*

Thinking that a player shouldn't play football until a felony charge is resolved is not a malformed opinion.  You may disagree with it, but that doesn't make it malformed.

1 minute ago, ColoradoHusk said:

My thought was Mo should be suspended for the first game this year to let him know that what he has done is wrong, and he deserves some type of punishment while the case is on-going.  The University decided on a 1/2 game suspension, so me and the University have similar opinions.

 

While I am not excusing what Mo did, I think the felony charge is only that strong due to some oddly-worded California laws, along with timing of when Mo became an "adult".  

But the problem is the University didn't say why he was suspended.  So like someone said 86 pages ago, we are left to speculate.  

And I agree that the felony charge in this instance is too harsh.

1 minute ago, Undone said:

 

Totally. According to the letter of the law, they're worlds apart.

 

I should maybe have made it clearer that I was referring to his original intentions and the context of those intentions as it pertains to a lot of people that are pretty drastically committing character assassination against him.

Making Washington into a victim is a turn I didn't see coming.

5 minutes ago, FrantzHardySwag said:

So should be aggressively pursuing every 18 y/o with a 17 y/o GF then. Man if we think prisons are crowded now. 

They should probably aggressively pursue every 18 year old that distributes sex videos of minors, for sure.

So when the next budget comes up for debate, I really hope Democrats hold the Pentagon accountable for re-appropriating billions of dollars earmarked for other projects being funneled to the wall.