ScarletRevival
-
Posts
330 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Media Demo
Posts posted by ScarletRevival
-
-
1 minute ago, Decoy73 said:
You didn't answer my question. I'll phrase it in another way. Do you believe the 2A affords citizens the to own any type of firearm? You stated it's pretty clear cut.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, Scarlet said:
Your credibility continues to plummet from an already deep hole. Not sure how that's possible but...
Once again do you have anything to back this up?
IIRC a coroner's report that he had lethal amounts of illicit narcotics in his system. I also did find this:
"The opioid epidemic has led to the creation of a new term: Toxic Brain Injury. This type of brain injury occurs from prolonged substance misuse and nonfatal overdose. This encompasses two forms of brain injury resulting from a lack of oxygen – hypoxic and anoxic brain injury. Hypoxic brain injury occurs when the brain does not receive enough oxygen, while anoxic brain injury occurs when the brain does not receive any oxygen. In these situations, the amount of time the brain is without adequate oxygen dictates the severity of injury."
https://www.biausa.org/public-affairs/media/the-solution-to-opioids-is-treatment
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Scarlet said:
He died from a lack of oxygen and the restraint according to people who know what they are talking about but don't let justice get in your way of a good lie session.
Did the people who "people who know what they are talking about" also describe how putting a knee on a person's shoulder "cuts off oxygen?
Do you know what else causes people to die from lack of oxygen? Having meth and fentanyl at over twice the lethal limit in your system, per people who actually know what they are talking about. Apparently he had so many drugs in his system that another person in the car with him that day wouldn't testify because he himself was worried about being charged with manslaughter for giving Floyd the drugs.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Scarlet said:
"Illegal immigrants" are migrants who have entered the country without legal permission. All of the migrants being released by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, on the other hand, have applied for asylum and have a legal claim to remain in the U.S. while they await their asylum proceedings.
Using the two terms interchangeably is inaccurate, said Andrea Meza, director of family detention services for Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services, or RAICES.
"These folks are asylum seekers, so criminalizing them based on their manner of entry, which is not related to their legal ability to seek asylum, is misleading," Meza said
Of course don't let the rule of law get in your way. Do you have evidence of the "tens of thousands of Covid positive illegal immigrants that China Joe has released?"
Politifact, lol.
You do realize that for a person to seek asylum that they have to do so in the next country that they pass over into, right? I'm sure that you also know that wanting to make money and send it back to their family or to get better healthcare isn't a legitimate reason to seek asylum.
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, Decoy73 said:
Our president's job is to be concerned with all Americans. Not just his family. Remember, that changed on 1/20/21.
I'd bet that China Joe is very concerned about keeping his kid out of the pokey. But, I'm sure that the checks will still flow in from Russia, China, the Ukraine, etc. to the Biden Crime family even if Hunter is in the clink.
Interesting that you bring up the President though. He is/was the President to and for everyone, unlike China Joe who has done everything he can to be divisive and to, without evidence, paint a certain section of our citizens as something that they are not.
But to be fair to the old guy, he was a total moron prior to the cognitive decline, now with the dementia or alzheimer's setting in he is a total embarrassment.
1 hour ago, Decoy73 said:So, would you support banning guns that are intended to kill, except for those w/ legitimate civilian uses which, in addition to the target and industrial guns, are: pistols for concealed carry, hunting rifles and shotguns?
I believe in our Constitution. The 2nd Amendment is pretty clear cut.
-
2
-
1
-
-
On 4/5/2021 at 3:31 PM, suh_fan93 said:
I'm guessing that if Covid numbers increase in Texas, the dems/progressives/leftists will blame ending masks mandates and other oppressive covid regulations.
They'll conveniently forget or bury the fact that China Joe created a mess at the border and has been releasing tens of thousands of Covid positive illegal immigrants into Texas and other other states.
-
3
-
1
-
-
17 minutes ago, knapplc said:
Gun owners had better come to the table and start talking about controlling these things or they're going to lose them entirely.
17 minutes ago, knapplc said:Gun owners had better come to the table and start talking about controlling these things or they're going to lose them entirely.
How about they enforce the thousands of gun laws that are currently on the books. They can start with tossing the drug addicted felon Hunter in the pokey.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:
I assume that’s directed at me and I know the study well as I also know the population centers well.
I will start by saying as I’ve said before, I wear a mask at stores before and after being vaccinated. Go shove the science denial thing somewhere else.
I guess it depends on which "science" you choose to believe.
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, ZRod said:
It's f#&%ing Canada...
Not sure if I was supposed to laugh at this, but I did.
4 minutes ago, Born N Bled Red said:Some stats from 3 years ago on illegal border crossings at the Canadian border.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48629658
And reports by the Department of Homeland Security note that most undocumented immigrants do not cross the US border illegally, but rather overstay their visas. In 2017, Canadians overstaying their visa made up the largest group of these migrants, followed by Mexicans.
Well, you've now convinced me that we need a stronger border presence on the northern side, along with more robust law enforcement regarding visa compliance.
-
2
-
-
28 minutes ago, Enhance said:
I'm not saying it is; however, there's no denying this country's gun culture and lax approach to gun legislation is directly correlated to the sheer volume of gun violence and deaths we experience. We have a cultural obsession and problem with guns and it goes far beyond just supporting the 2nd Amendment.
I'll agree that it goes far beyond the 2nd Amendment. It's mental health, which is a real issue that this country still has a long ways to go to get under control, so to speak.
QuoteThe same goes for guns. Their purpose is to kill. They weren't invented to shoot at paper targets or clay pigeons.
Not true at all. Some guns are manufactured specifically for target shooting. Some are used specifically for industrial purposes. Sure those arms CAN end a life, but so can any vehicle, knife, hammer, screwdriver, katana, brick, etc.
The fact still remains that there are hundreds of millions of guns that never have, nor ever will be used in ending a human life. I have never heard of an abortion that doesn't end a life.
-
2
-
1
-
-
On 3/31/2021 at 5:07 AM, Scarlet said:
And they're really deadly if you don't put your full weight through your knee on someone's neck for 9 minutes and 29 seconds.
You must have missed or ignored the testimony of a witness who disputes the false narrative you've fallen for:
"During cross examination, defense attorney Eric Nelson offered for the first time a series of photographs from Officer Thomas Lane's body camera. Mercil agreed they show Chauvin's knee and shin on Floyd's shoulder area. The images offer four moments within a five-minute span.
After viewing those photos, Nelson asked Mercil, "Does this appear to be a neck restraint?" He responded with "no.""
That's what is called a fact.
It appears that we agree, in that those drugs are really, really deadly in the levels that they were found in Floyd's system.
-
3
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, Born N Bled Red said:
Maybe those people are anti-brown people then instead of anti-immigrant.
Yet millions of "brown" people are anti-illegal immigration.
QuoteWhy aren't we building a wall on our northern boarder.
Have there been tens of millions of illegal immigrants (including people on the FBI's terrorist watch list) illegally crossing the northern border?
I do agree that we should have a strong northern border, too.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Enhance said:
I disagree.
Any conservative who claims they're pro-life while simultaneously supporting this country's gun culture and looser gun regulation is operating under an incredible convenience in ideologies. Basically, the child deserves to be born, but if that child gets killed in a drive-by shooting thanks to our lax gun policies and obsessive gun culture... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Being pro-2nd Amendment isn't being pro-murder. There are hundreds of millions of legally purchased firearms in this country that are never used to take a life.
I don't know of any abortion that has been performed that hasn't resulted in the taking of a life.
The ending of a life is really the only function of an abortion.
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
48 minutes ago, Scarlet said:
I'll take the word of the Trump appointed head of cyber security over random angry white internet conspiracy theorist any day.
Please show which facts support your claim, without evidence, that the last election was not the most secure in "out" history. Also, please list the next least secure.
That's not how this works, you made a false claim that you can't factually back up.
It appears as though Krebs' opinion was made, again, without evidence.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, knapplc said:
Calls on congress? I thought he was taking executive action on this stuff.
That would be unconstitutional.
China Joe really should be more concerned about keeping guns out of the hands of his drug addict son and the illegal actions of his uber-trash daughter in law. Why is Hunter not in jail for the felony he committed when he falsified federal firearms purchase paperwork? Why is his DIL not in prison for throwing an illegally purchased firearm into an easily accessible trash receptacle?
Also, why hasn't the dark actor who sent in the Secret Service to scrub Hunter's firearm mess been unmasked and why is that person not in prison?
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Enhance said:
Makes me think of how it's pretty amazing that gun rights activists (many of whom are also pro-life, right-to-life folks) often fail to acknowledge the prevalent hypocrisy between these two ideals.
They'll do everything they can to get you into this world while simultaneously supporting gun rights and gun policies that work pretty hard to take you out of it.
There is actually zero hypocrisy, an apple isn't a kumquat.
I personally find it amazing the hypocrisy of the pro-abortion crowd when they feign concern over mass shootings, human trafficked (sexually abused or murdered) illegal immigrants, human rights, etc.
-
1
-
-
On 4/6/2021 at 9:57 PM, knapplc said:
What?
What clarification do you need, I was extremely straight forward.
On 4/7/2021 at 12:10 AM, Dr. Strangelove said:Furthermore, stop acting like masks are 100% effective, they aren't. They simply reduce the risk of spreading the virus by a small amount.
So you're saying they are basically worthless, and I agree with you. Covid rates pre and post mask mandates back that up.
After a bit more thought, I was thinking back pre-Covid to when I would go seek medical help for chronic upper respiratory illnesses. For a stretch of about 8 to 10 years, I made dozens of trips including at least 2 times in which I exhibited flu-like symptoms.
Not ONE time did the medical staff require or request that I wear a mask, nor did any of the nurses or doctors who checked me out or ran test on me wear a mask.
Not one time.
That's how much the actual medical professionals who actually treat patients feel that masks are worthwhile in stopping the spread of respiratory viruses.
-
2
-
-
On 4/7/2021 at 10:43 AM, Scarlet said:
The fact of the matter is the past election was the most secure in our history.
That word doesn't mean what you think it means.
Please show which facts support your claim, without evidence, that the last election was the most secure in out history. Also, please list the next most secure.
-
2
-
-
On 4/7/2021 at 11:15 AM, knapplc said:
Do you think that's realistic?
How much voting impropriety is acceptable to you?
On 4/7/2021 at 11:24 AM, DevoHusker said:No, not really. And, I think that you and I are probably hoping for the same goal, but from two opposite trains of thought.
But I would like to see it less than the 1,300 instances that we know of. You would like that too, if for nothing else than confidence in our elections/results.
1,300 instances, and afaik there is very little investigation into alleged voting fraud.
That is a lot.
-
2
-
-
On 4/7/2021 at 9:10 AM, knapplc said:
No studies have found that providing every eligible voter a ballot by mail would result in security issues.
Can you please reference these studies because I am not aware of them.
-
On 4/7/2021 at 7:16 AM, Frott Scost said:
You know a thread has run its course when James O’Keefe is used to show proof of voter fraud. The same James O’Keefe that has been found to pay the people in his videos to do what he wants and the same James O’Keefe that had to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in settlements for the people he smeared? Thats the guy people trust for their news? What a joke.
That article doesn't back up what you are claiming.
"The lawsuit was filed on the assertion that O’Keefe broke a state law prohibiting the surreptitious recording of someone’s voice and image."
-
1
-
-
On 4/6/2021 at 7:52 PM, commando said:
where was the proof about all those trump claims of election fraud? when they went to court they went with allegations and never showed any proof of all that. it's why the judges threw the cases out of court. there was no evidence presented by trumps team to justify a trial. if there was evidence i don't know why they didn't show it.
also....didn't we just hear 1 of trumps lead lawyers says that no rational person who heard the claims they presented would believe them?
so..in short....show me the convictions to back up the far right mantra of massive voter fraud.
According to at least one attorney that I heard discuss these court cases, the majority of them were dismissed on "Standing" so courts did not decide to hear the cases.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Scarlet said:
... it never dawned on you that the whole intention of this and other laws around the country are to target specific demographics?
lol
QuoteThere was no election fraud and the past election was the most secure in our country's history. Fact.
Actually, that is not a fact. There were reportedly over 1100 signed affidavits from poll workers, watchers, etc that detailed suspicious activity. We all saw the tape of the Republicans get kicked out of a Fulton County poll, only to have cases of ballots that were hidden under tables being counted shortly after they were removed. James O'Keefe posted a recording (scrubbed by Big Tech) of one of the higher ups of Dominion saying that he told some of his allies in Facistfa that "they took care of it, Trump wasn't going to win."
If this really was the "most secure election in our history" please provide the next most secure elections. I would like numbers 2 to10, but I'll be generous and just ask for the next 2-5 most secure elections.
QuoteYet the Republicans tried to overturn our country's free and fair elections. They tried to subvert our democracy. Right in plain sight with the whole Stop the Steal sham that culminated in the assault on our nation's capitol. Somehow now you'd believe that they are the honorable arbiters of election law? For some reason you've ignored this quandary in your argument.
You mean like the Dems tried to overturn the Bush/Gore election? Or how Pelosi was trying to steal a house seat from SE Iowa that a (R) won after numerous recounts?
Quoteliterally just tried to overturn the very foundation of our democracy?
1) nobody actually thought that the "Stop the Steal" rally would stop China's pedo on retainer from being placed in the White House.
2) Maybe having a discussion with you is a waste of time considering that you don't know that the United States isn't a democracy.
QuoteSo again what is the intention of this law?
So that we won't have a free-for-all election like we just saw back in November.
We understand that self loathing white progressives/liberals/leftists think that p.o.c are stupid, lazy criminals, but guess what.......we need IDs to drive, to see a doctor, to get medication, to legally purchase firearms, to get a hunting or fishing license, to buy alcohol and smokes, to pick up products in store that we ordered on line, etc. Shoot, the neighborhood school requires an ID to pick up a pre-ordered lunch.
Guess what, we're also smart enough to fill out absentee voting applications or to bring our own water bottle or other drink should we need to stand in line for a few minutes. We also will likely not die from standing in line for a little while. Many of us have stood in lines for hours to get into clubs without water and didn't die.
Showing an ID should be a requirement for voting.
-
2
-
1
-
-
On 4/3/2021 at 10:48 PM, knapplc said:
And Rand Paul speaks out against that, and we're supposed to address that soberly because of what now?
It's really easy to see the how the Covid numbers have increased and decreased regardless of whether municipalities, cities, regions, etc. have mask mandates in place, and how many places saw dramatic increases in Covid numbers after mask mandates were made.
QuoteHave surgeons been wearing masks in vain for more than 100 years?
No. They've been wearing them to stop the spread of bacteria, not viruses. This is coming from multiple doctors (those who actually treat patients) I've heard from.
If masks really do work, can you explain how you contracted the Vid?
-
2
-
1
-
Gun Control
in Politics & Religion
Posted
<snip>
Nonsense. The NRA one of the reasons why we still have a few remaining rights.
Disarming the populace hasn't worked out well for the people in leftist totalitarianism regimes, see the USSR, North Korea, Nazi Germany or Communist China.
Edit: Public education systems and their unions have done far more to harm this country than the NRA ever could.
Yes, over 20,000 guns laws on the books AFAIK. How about we enforce those laws?
Yet there are hundreds of millions on firearms in this country that will never be used in the killing of a human so that's false.
If there are no police or military around, and a roaming group of marxist insurrectionists stroll through your neighborhood, threatening to kill your dog, rape your spouse and burn your house down you might find out why a person would need one.
Furthermore, these are sporting rifles. Many conservationist use these tools when hunting.
Lastly, AR style rifles are used in a very small number of homicides.
"You are five times more likely to be killed by a knife than by a rifle. Hands, fists and feet caused twice as many deaths as rifles.
According to the FBI’s crime statistics for 2018, there were 14,123 murders committed with a weapon of some kind. Of the total, rifles claimed 297 victims, compared to 1,515 for knives and other cutting instruments, and 672 for “personal weapons” defined as hands, fists, feet and even pushing. Even blunt objects such as hammers and clubs caused more deaths than rifles."
http://ninelinenews.com/articles-2/2nd-amendment/gun-activists-in-meltdown-over-new-fbi-stats-on-ar-15-deaths/
I'm not sure about the structure in which you reside or if you own a vehicle, but you don't need those either. You can live in a 10 by 10 tent and walk wherever you'd like to go.