Jump to content


tattooedhusker

Members
  • Posts

    4,685
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tattooedhusker

  1. 2 minutes ago, STL Husker said:

    Did it surprise anyone else that Chip Kelly's contract was under $5 mil/year?  I assumed that he was the top coach on the market.  How much do you think Frost is getting a year?  I thought he would be 5 to 5.5 mil a year, but now I'm wondering if we are closer to 4-4.5.

    Nope, he is still getting tons of cash from the NFL

    • Plus1 1
  2. 4 minutes ago, LaFlamaBlanca said:

    SERIOUS question posters.... Am I getting dookied on here? I'm a relatively new poster. One moment I'm slinging dope gifs and pics like its my effin profession, and then all the sudden I am only allowed .29mb upload file size, which isn't even enough to share a cropped Brett Favre d**k pic...

     

    I love Scott Frost can't wait till he is our coach, still on topic

     

    Peep the post to +1s -- my ratio is undeniable... Give the people what they want

     

    Scott Frost

     

    Capture.thumb.JPG.2345b8e355b84d3306b493ff5204fa01.JPG

    Go into your profile settings, and delete some of the older files

  3. 1 minute ago, Saunders said:

    The media narrative of "Nebraska needs to give a coach time" needs to die. You'll get time, naturally, if you don't coach two losing seasons in 3 years, and the worst team in 50+ years. Lack of time isn't the problem at NU. Bad coaching, and lack of accountability is.

     

     

    Please for the love of all that is holy.... Beat Iowa.

    Exactly. As soon as they said he needs time, I almost lost it.

    • Plus1 2
  4.  

     

    Nope, don't care for tats. Just don't understand the whole idea of them.

     

    What is he going to do in three years if he gets traded? Cowboy tat on his forearm. Yep...that would look good wearing a Redskin's or Denver uniform.

     

    The guy really has no brains.

    am i missing something...obviously it's a star tattoo, but there is more going on there...once he quits playing for Dallas, it's no longer a "Dallas" tattoo...it can just be a tattoo of a star with a rosary and some other stuff? (can't make out the words exactly?)

     

    Or he uses the Dallas Cowboys tattoo as something that he will look back upon in 20 years and think "Man, those days in the draft were crazy, but it made me a better man."

     

    I don't know the reasons people get tattoos, and I will never get one. But, for the most part I won't question the reasons or decisions of a complete stranger getting a tattoo.

     

    I do have one exception, there is a mom of a girl in my daughter's dance class. The mom is all tatted up, and that's fine. But, she has a tattoo of a heart on her chest, and it goes into her cleavage. Inside the heart it says "Daddy's Little Girl". Now, that's just weird to me.

     

    That is a little weird...Only thing I'm opposed to is significant others names inked on you. Children's, parents, etc...yeah, but never a bf/gf

  5.  

     

     

     

     

     

     

    I am thinking if Ameer Abdullah had gotten a tattoo of the Lions logo, everyone would be saying "that's really cool".

    But he would never be so stupid as to do that, and that's why he will have a longer and more successful career than RG.

     

    So if a guy is into tattoos and get's a tattoo for his new team, he's being stupid? I'm not a tattoo guy at all, but this criticism of RG is getting pretty crazy.

     

    I think it's a bit shortsighted and presumptuous to go out and get a massive Cowboy tat on your arm the day after your're drafted, yeah. Why not prove yourself a bit, get accepted in the lockerroom, play a game or 2, you know, like that. Show a little class. Then, if you must, get the tat, but still, maybe something a bit more undertstated. Only in sports and pop/rock/gangsta culture can anybody get away with these ridiculous tats. What if he ever has to become part of the real world?

     

    That line of thinking is wrong...

     

    Oh, does the corporate world have a preference for tattoo embossed employees these days? I must have missed that memo.

     

     

    The corporate world has a preference for people who know how to do their job. Hard to believe, I know...

     

    Good luck applying for real jobs in the real world with a body covered in tats.

     

    I work in the real world...what the hell is going on here :lol:

  6.  

     

     

     

     

    I am thinking if Ameer Abdullah had gotten a tattoo of the Lions logo, everyone would be saying "that's really cool".

    But he would never be so stupid as to do that, and that's why he will have a longer and more successful career than RG.

     

    So if a guy is into tattoos and get's a tattoo for his new team, he's being stupid? I'm not a tattoo guy at all, but this criticism of RG is getting pretty crazy.

     

    I think it's a bit shortsighted and presumptuous to go out and get a massive Cowboy tat on your arm the day after your're drafted, yeah. Why not prove yourself a bit, get accepted in the lockerroom, play a game or 2, you know, like that. Show a little class. Then, if you must, get the tat, but still, maybe something a bit more undertstated. Only in sports and pop/rock/gangsta culture can anybody get away with these ridiculous tats. What if he ever has to become part of the real world?

     

    That line of thinking is wrong...

     

    Oh, does the corporate world have a preference for tattoo embossed employees these days? I must have missed that memo.

     

    I work in the "corporate world" and am fully sleeved with ink on my fingers as well, so I am inclined to believe that your line of thinking has surpassed its expiration date.

    • Fire 7
×
×
  • Create New...