Chef K

Could'nt help but having to comment on that piece of sh*t video.

And here I thought Huckfusker would take some time off from mopping up the gay porno theater to offer his unique perspective on this weekend's game.

But you know, I've wonder why you never see any KSUcks fans outside of their saftey zones. I go to a couple of different boards, and even visited others. NEVER seen a KSUcks fan on any of them.

You guys are frankly...ridiculous. Craig James is accurate, our defense hasn't shown anything in several years (besides being OK in 2006) that deserves national praise, and Mark May does not hate Nebraska.

 

 

 

Neither does Kirk Herbstreit.

Fine, does it bother you that James orgasms when anybody says SEC, or that his nose is brown from Tebow's ass?

Okay....most people know I'm a Mizzou fan and this is a pretty simple question.

Flamers need not apply.

 

Since 99.9% of the posters on this board are Husker fans, when Mizzou is playing an opponent other than the Huskers....who do you root for?

Do you back your Big XII North brethren and root for evertyhing Big XII...specifically the North?

Do you hope that Mizzou wins and makes a Husker matchup that much more meaningful?

or

Do you just hate those clowns from the beautiful state to the SE and hope they never win a game?

 

 

As a Mizzou fan, I'm torn.

 

Being a Missouri native, I have come to despise anything Jayhawk, Sooner or Bugeater.

I've been a fan of the Tigers since the 60's and watched Mizzou hold their own until the late 70's. (Until that dreadful losing streak lasted till '03)

So it's good to see that the order is being restored and Mizzou is winning with regularity against the Huskers.

 

When it comes to the Husker-Hokie matchup, half of me wants the Huskers to win and have both teams go into the October 8th matchup with undefeated records and major impact. The other half wants to see a HUGE defeat, so you guys are kept in check a little bit.

 

Your thoughts and comments start...............NOW.

"Flamers need not apply" So exactly what are you doing here?

"I’m not used to losing. I’m not used to getting beat soundly. Once again, that’s my fault. Yes, damn right, yes, I am embarrassed. I apologize to the team, I apologize to the state of Nebraska, I apologize to everybody associated with the University of Nebraska football and it’s my responsibility. I was hired to do a job and I didn’t do that job tonight.” – Bo Pelini

 

 

Get ready to cut and paste this Bo. Save you some time in 2 of the next 3 games....

 

Oh Crap...!!!! Mizzou just scored again down in Lincoln!!!!!! 93-23 and counting!!!!! But you will win this year. OK!!!!!

 

I am amazed ESPN picked this game for a 3rd consecutive season after being over at half the last 2 years.

 

Also, VT doesn't lose at home non-conference....EVER!!!!

I hope Rent-a-Center finds you quickly so they can get their computer back.

I hate to say this but Mizzery doesn't look too bad right now. Either Illinois isn't that good or we are gonna have our hands full.

Illinois coached by Ron Zook, that's a key right there. Now granted the Illini shot themselves over and over again. But I think in a little less than four weeks Gabbert is gonna get a reality check.

Crush your enemy, see them driven before you and hear the lamination of their women!

I remember eating Valentino's in Ames Iowa. A good pizza considering it's a corporate entity.

Bob -

 

#1) Your examples of "articles" are blogs.......

 

#2) For ever "article" you post saying the system works, I can find you at least one that says it doesn't.

 

For example:

 

Babies born in Hospital Corridors: Bed Shortage forces 4000 mothers to give birth in lifts, offices and hosptial toilets

 

Man collpses with ruptured appendix....three weeks after NHS doctors 'took it out'

 

Sounds like great health care too me

 

I'll let you find the rest b/c I'm not taking the time to look up what I already know. Notice how my examples come from a real news source in the UK.

The fact remains is that every other industrialized, or civilized country. Health care for it's citizens is a right not a privilege. It's about taking care of ones citizens, not economics, policy or business. I know you, SOCAL, and Sarge think that the only thing wrong with America's present health care system is the need for tort reform. But believe or not, this system has got to change.

EDIT: moved to P & R rawhide

I find it amazing that we are on page TWO about some douche bag, no life, jealous, smooth brained punk. Hopefully Rent-a-Center will locate him and get their computer back.

I have a list of questions that I never hear anyone on the right or anti-reform crowd answer. I don’t expect you to answer all of the questions at any one time (although it would be interesting), but you certainly could pick three or four and give a honest factual answer*.

1. Why are we the only industrialized nation in the world that does not have universal health care?

2. Why are we the only nation in the world that allows insurance companies to deny coverage because of pre-existing conditions?

3. Why do Republicans say that a government run health insurance system will be more costly than a private system when actual administrative costs for Medicare are just 3% of the total expenditure and for private insurers are 14% of the total?

4. Why do Republicans claim that private insurance companies are better run than any government system would operate but then whine that a government system would be too efficient for private insurers to compete against? President Obama insists that a public system must be self-sufficient and not subsidized by taxpayers so it would be a level playing field.

5. Why are 31% of health care costs in the U.S. spent on administrative expenses while less than half of that expense occurs in single payer government run systems around the world? Over $1000.00 per person per year is spent on health care administrative costs in the USA.

6. Why do we rank 37th in overall quality of care and 72nd in overall health of 191 countries evaluated? The facts are that virtually every nation with universal care spends far less on their health care than we do with far better results.

7. Why do French men live three years longer than American men? Don’t they drink a lot, smoke a lot, and eat rich food? Could it be that their health care is far better than ours?

8. Why, if we have the most technology and spend the most money on health care, do we rank 29th in infant mortality rate? The rate our babies die in their first year is twice that of European nations. Why is it acceptable to Republicans to kill our babies unnecessarily?

9. Why would Republicans worry that a government bureaucracy would get between the patient and the doctor when they find it acceptable for private insurance companies do that right now?

10. Why, if Canadians have to come to the US for timely treatment as Republicans claim, are our border states’ hospitals not overrun with Canadians? Could it be that the vast majority of Canadians getting care in the US are doing so because they get sick during their 2-3 months as “snowbirds” in Hilton Head, Myrtle Beach, and West Palm Beach? Studies by legitimate independent researchers do not support the antidotal “evidence” in the GOP ads.

11. Why are we are spending 50% more of our GDP on health care costs than any other nation? The average annual costs for countries with universal health care is 10% of GDP. France, with the best health care in the world, pays just 11% of their GDP versus our 16% of GDP.

12. Why, if Republicans are concerned about costs for businesses and the government, do they support a system that spends so much more of our business profits and government receipts (taxes) on health care than all other countries?

13. Why, if adjudication costs are going down (a statistical fact), are malpractice insurance costs continuing to rise? (More profits for the insurance companies?!?!).

14. Why do the top 5% of Americans use 50% of health care expenditures?

15. If our average American is getting “the best health care in the world” for an average insurance cost of $12,000.00; what do the Rolls Royce plans provide for $40,000.00? What is it that the wealthy are getting for their insurance dollars that the average American is not? Private rooms do not cost that much. Could it be that the best health care in the world is reserved for only the wealthy?

16. Why, if Republicans are worried about the bottom line, did they pass the Medicare drug bill without the ability to negotiate costs with drug companies? The result is that Medicare is paying 77% higher drug costs than other governments do.

17. Why, if Republicans are worried about deficits, did they pass the Medicare drug bill without a means to pay for it? President Obama has said that health care reform will be budget neutral and has reinstated PayGo requirements for congress. (PayGo = all new expenditures must be balanced by reductions elsewhere or paid for by new revenues).

18. Why are we one of only two countries in the world that permits television advertising of prescription drugs?

19. Why do Republicans say that there are ways of taking care of the problems with the health insurance industry and delivery of care other than what the Democrats want to do, yet they offer no actual plans that stand scrutiny?

20. Why, if Republicans have a better way of fixing health care as they claim, did they not do it during the Bush administration?

21. How do we claim a higher moral standing than others when we find it acceptable to make a profit on the misery and illnesses of our citizens when all other nations believe it is morally reprehensible to treat their people that way?

22. Why are the same “moral and Christian value” politicians who stopped health care reform fifteen years ago still putting insurance companies and private for-profit providers ahead of the citizens they claim to represent?

How can anyone argue against reform after honestly answering the above questions.

*All data and statistics used in the questions are from reliable and verifiable sources and not from liberal or conservative groups or organizations. The data may be found and verified easily through simple Google searches.

I am really not that worried about KU. I am not sure why they think they are going to be so good with the oline that they have. I know that athlon's article was quoted, but it is proven that an oline that has not played together will not play good together. They might be better by Nov, but that will not help them much against NU's dline.

 

Our two best OL will be lining up against Suh. They got way better as the season went on last year and it showed in our running game. Over the final 7 games sharp was averaging 5 yrds a carry. Hawkinson is going to be a really good LT from what they are saying. Don't you guys have a pretty young OL this year?

 

Let's say you hold KU to 35 again this year. With what you are missing on O how do you score more than that?

Great points Jayhawker, but they don't want to hear that. They don't want to hear that even though Reesing was running for his life against them last year, he still threw for 304 yds and 3 TD's. So with that said, one can only assume that KU will score at least 35-40 points on Nebraska. How can Nebraska top that with a new QB and little experience at receiver? You can't run the ball everytime and expect to score 40 plus. You're not the Nebraska of the 90's.

i think they realize it's not the nebraska of the 90's. Their right side of their OL will be their weekness and with the improvement of KU's DL, they were good against the run last year, we should be able to keep them from scoring on every series. My prediction 42 - 24 KU.

From reports I've seen it appears KU's OL will be a bigger weakness. Plus replacing all your LBs, a still suspect secondary and switching defensive formations. Gives me the conclusion that our Huskers will return to the the Big-XII championship game.

the reports i've seen and linked says the OL will not be as bad as last years. Your replacing your QB, and your top WR's plus your entire right side of your OL. You are losing 14 tds from your O. The D switch is going to help out our weakness at LB and the LB's this year are bigger and faster than the three we lost. Apparently you have never heard of Stuckey? With your suspect LB's and DB's I come to the conclusion that KU will play in it's first B12 title game.

And that post is what I consider to be "drunk on Kool-Aid" response. Yeah I've heard of Stuckey, but who else have you got?................Anybody?...................

But I digress, we'll just have to wait for that Saturday in November to see what's what.

I am really not that worried about KU. I am not sure why they think they are going to be so good with the oline that they have. I know that athlon's article was quoted, but it is proven that an oline that has not played together will not play good together. They might be better by Nov, but that will not help them much against NU's dline.

 

Our two best OL will be lining up against Suh. They got way better as the season went on last year and it showed in our running game. Over the final 7 games sharp was averaging 5 yrds a carry. Hawkinson is going to be a really good LT from what they are saying. Don't you guys have a pretty young OL this year?

 

Let's say you hold KU to 35 again this year. With what you are missing on O how do you score more than that?

Great points Jayhawker, but they don't want to hear that. They don't want to hear that even though Reesing was running for his life against them last year, he still threw for 304 yds and 3 TD's. So with that said, one can only assume that KU will score at least 35-40 points on Nebraska. How can Nebraska top that with a new QB and little experience at receiver? You can't run the ball everytime and expect to score 40 plus. You're not the Nebraska of the 90's.

i think they realize it's not the nebraska of the 90's. Their right side of their OL will be their weekness and with the improvement of KU's DL, they were good against the run last year, we should be able to keep them from scoring on every series. My prediction 42 - 24 KU.

From reports I've seen it appears KU's OL will be a bigger weakness. Plus replacing all your LBs, a still suspect secondary and switching defensive formations. Gives me the conclusion that our Huskers will return to the the Big-XII championship game.

Race relations, racism, racial profiling, gay rights, illegal immigration, etc... All a cop out for those refusing to look at the true problem plaguing society, the disregard and deterioration of individual liberty.

Just curious, how is gay rights like the right to marry a deterioration of individual liberty?

Pennsylvania {don't hold it against me} by way of Iowa.

 

Me, too.

One more here in pennsylvania, originally from Allen Ne, then Manhattan KS (Army) then back home then to PA. Sure miss Valentino's and a good Runza!

Looks like we got the start of a Husker mafia to take over this bass ackwards state.

Let's see, Paterno has a losing record against top ten teams, an unimpressive record against top 20 teams, two national championships and a whopping THREE conference titles. Yeah he's a top coach alright. And about that "moral" thing? Look at the track record of some of his players lately.

Not a Paterno appologist but - most of the time of Joe Pa's tenure PennSt was an independent. Kind of hard to win a title when you are not in a conference.

By his choice, he's happy beating the Temples, Akrons and Coastal Carolinas of the college football world. And his record shows that. Most of his career has been the proverbial Big fish in a little pond.

Let's see, Paterno has a losing record against top ten teams, an unimpressive record against top 20 teams, two national championships and a whopping THREE conference titles. Yeah he's a top coach alright. And about that "moral" thing? Look at the track record of some of his players lately.

Pennsylvania {don't hold it against me} by way of Iowa.

45

Congrats BRI. Let's hope for your wifes sake that your boys aren't just like you.

The Cotton Bowl game against Auburn. The writing was on the wall for me on that one.

Coke or Pepsi? - Coke

Blondes or brunettes? - Brunettes

Beer or liquor? - Liquor

Black coffee or w/cream? - Neither, tea. no cream

Soccer or hockey? (just pick which one you think is better, no "neither's" or "football", we all know football is better, especially with a white helmet with a N on the side) - Hockey, without question

PAT or go for two? - Two point conversion

GBR or Husker Power? - Both are suitable

Paper or plastic? -Paper

Classic Rock or Alternative Rock? - Classic

Maybe she wants to continue her movie career?

I'll be working both jobs. Will throw a little get together on Sunday though.

PSUcks without question should be on that list.