Jump to content


JTrain

Members
  • Posts

    3,814
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Posts posted by JTrain

  1.  

    I think the bigger or better question is, why arent we developing quarterbacks into NFL players. I would love to have a top 10 recruiting class, I cannot remember which game I was watching, was some top 25 team whos head QB was a 2 star recruit.

     

    I guess it is the age old question of the chicken or the egg.

     

    Is it the recruiting or the coaches? Why do other teams seem to make coal into diamonds, and we still end up with coal?

     

     

    I would question whether most of the players on that list were really developed by their college coaches. Many of them may have just been diamonds in the rough or late bloomers. Of course I don't know for sure, but I kind of doubt the QB coaches at Delaware, EIU, UC-Davis, etc. were brilliant player developers.

  2. Eric Crouch was drafted in the NFL in 2001-2002, but as a safety. It is the style of offense that dictates what we recruit.

     

    We don't run that offense anymore. Nor do we have a world-class offensive line or a strength and conditioning program that's miles ahead of the competition. We might compete for the Big 10 with a 50% passer, but we aren't playing in any national title games.

  3. How many QB's won a NC while in college and then went on to become starters in the NFL since 2000? I'm not talking about getting drafted into the NFL. I'm talking about actually contributing in the NFL. Scam Newton is about the only one that comes to mind. Vince Young started some games, but where is he now? The college game is considerably different than the NFL. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm a lot more interested in winning NC's than I am how our QB's do in the NFL.

     

    Well, I don't believe anyone claimed you need a future NFL superstar at the helm to win titles.

     

    Let's make the safe assumption that Winston will start an NFL game in the future. Then, of the 12 QBs to win national titles in that time frame, 9 will have started at least one NFL game, 1 played in the NFL but did not start, and two did not appear in the NFL.

     

    So it's definitely safe to say that having a quarterback with an arm at least good enough to see the field on Sunday is an important part of building a champion in today's environment. Especially if you aren't stacked across the board with top recruits. The two that didn't play in the NFL were AJ McCarron and Josh Heupel, both of whom were surrounded with incredible talent from top five recruiting classes.

  4. Here's a list of Big Ten players that have played QB in the NFL since the 2000 season. Players in bold have started at least 16 NFL games. Players in italics have played in games but not started. The player in gray italics was drafted and made a roster but hasn't played in a regular season game.

     

     

    NQVvRFC.gif

     

     

    The last Husker to start an NFL game at QB was Turner Gill's backup, Bruce Mathison on October 11, 1987 for the Seahawks.

     

    For decades, we were luckily enough to have a great head coach and offensive coordinator with a unique offensive system that allowed us to have incredible success with a running back/athlete/decision maker at QB. Frazier, Frost and Crouch were all great players but only adequate passers, and that was enough for our system.

     

    Taylor Martinez was a similar case, although he didn't have many of the advantages that the '90s teams had, and he was never quite the same after his injury. He was perhaps a slightly better passer than those guys, but he still had significant issues and inconsistencies with his passing.

     

    Since we aren't going to have consistent top ten recruiting classes, I think we will need a truly great dual-threat QB if we ever want to make the playoffs.

     

    When was the last time we had a quarterback that could legitimately pass the ball at an NFL level while also being a running threat? I'm talking guys in the vicinity of RGIII, Manziel, Terrell Pryor, Vince Young, Braxton Miller, Dak Prescott, etc. I would argue either it was Turner Gill (class of 1980) or we never have. I haven't seen enough of Gill to know if his passing skills were at that level. He threw a nice ball but I wouldn't put him up there based on completion percentage. I don't think Tommy will ever be there (I'd gladly be proven wrong), although with some improvement and a little help he can win a Big 10 title.

     

    Anyway, I mostly just thought the table was interesting and thought I'd share.

    • Fire 4
  5. I remember watching the 2002 Rose Bowl and, for the first time in my Husker life, feeling a sense of pity for Nebraska. As they scored a couple times late in the game, I thought, "Good for them. I'm proud they're still fighting to the bitter end."

     

    It felt kind of gross. I hoped I didn't have to do that again. Turns out I'd be doing it for the next 13 years (and counting).

  6. 2nd picture was just to show how aggressive their pursuit was right at the hand-off. They weren't concerned about a play action over the middle. Westy against the safety or perhaps the tight end against a linebacker was a possibility most of the night. Play-side safety was five yards from the LOS at the hand-off.

     

    4th picture was just to show how close Ameer was to breaking a 98-yard run. Wasn't suggesting any alternative play call.

    • Fire 1
  7. If we win out, do you honestly think we would be ranked 5th? I don't. We have zero opportunity to impress anybody the rest of the season, with the possible exception of a rematch with Mich St. I just don't see how we will climb in the polls.

     

    If we win impressively against Wisconsin, Iowa and the B1G CCG opponent, we would probably be in the 6-8 range. Maybe 4th or 5th if Oregon, Oklahoma and Baylor all somehow get two losses, which seems very unlikely.

  8. 1st half

     

    Overall, Michigan State was aggressive on defense and got progressively more so as they realized how limited we were. We couldn't find a way to make them pay. Beck was basically using the quick screen game as our running game, but there was no deep threat and no testing the middle of the field. Tommy was inaccurate, which I think was partially due to the types of throws he was asked to make.

     

    Our pass blocking was poor. Several times our tackles were blown by on the corner and several times they flat out missed assignments (coaching). Beck kept 6-7 blockers in several times, leaving fewer receiving options, while MSU usually only rushed four. The problem was that their four was still consistently beating our 6-7 due to blocks being completely missed or assignments blown. This meant we were getting the double whammy of not much time to pass and not many options to pass to (against seven or more in coverage).

     

    Our run blocking was poor. A few times we just missed blocks but more often we were not holding blocks long enough or getting pushed back. Our running plays were very straightforward and the linebackers did not hesitate much. Their front 6-7 attacked aggressively and we gave them no reason not to. We very rarely attempted misdirection and I don't believe we ran one HB screen or QB draw in the first half.

     

    f29uOeS.gif

     

    hxPGoBY.jpg

     

    IvsKIk8.jpg

     

    EWTGxhA.jpg

     

    fcqhJ21.jpg

     

    Second half to come, maybe.

    • Fire 3
  9.  

    Beck does not trust his quarterback making reads in the passing game in big games. This is partially justified because we don't have very good passing quarterbacks. But on the the other hand, you have to take chances to beat very good teams.

     

    This has happened before with Beck. He comes out nervous and only calls short passes, usually to the sidelines and usually with few if any reads. In some ways this seems to be a self-fulfilling prophecy, since the quarterback surely realizes his OC has no faith in him, causing him to play tight and lose confidence.

     

    Then, when we fall behind by 3 or 4 scores and become desperate, Beck figures there is nothing to lose, loosens up and starts opening up the passing game. Voila! It actually works to some degree and we make some nice plays downfield. But unfortunately it's too little too late. And then we have to ponder, what if he just came out with that attitude to begin with? What if he fires down the middle of the field to Westy or Moore right after the turnover and goes up 7-0 with a confident QB? Sure, he risks Tommy not seeing a safety and throwing an interception. But looking at the alternative... it's a risk worth taking.

    Dude, you are one of my favorite posters on this board. I really like your insights. Not the typical "safe" observations that most people make so the rest of the people on the board won't scream at them. Having said that, however, I have to disagree with you on this one. There were plenty of pass opportunities for Tommy. How many times can you miss a swing pass to a back by 7 yards when nobody is guarding him? Tommie was just atrocious in his throws last night. There were 5-10 throws he easily should have had for completions last night. I'm no huge Beck fan, but I think this one's on Tommy, not Beck.

     

     

    :wub:

     

    I wasn't trying to be black and white in the blame game. I was just making one particular observation about Beck, which I think still stands despite the Tommy comments. I agree that Tommy had an ugly game, and I don't think he is a very good quarterback overall. But I also think his strength is throwing downfield (and we weren't going to beat MSU with short sideline throws), and by the time Beck let him do much of this, it was too late and Tommy was playing tight and without much confidence.

     

    Somewhat unrelated, I was disappointed in how little Beck attempted to misdirect the MSU defensive line. I think Bollman really whooped him in this regard. Our offensive line looked like crap, which made this issue even more important.

  10.  

    I think we learned that we have been simply stretched too thin to compete with big time programs with this many injuries.

     

    Mike Rose

    Davis Santos
    Charles Jackson
    Avery Moss
    Leroy Alexande
    Cethan Carter
    Kenny Bell
    Jamal Turner
    Sam Burtch
    Brandon Reily
    Marcus Newby
    Adam Taylor
    These guys not on the field was what broke us tonight. With this defense, I think we will be in Indy at the end of the year... I just hope we get another shot at Sparty.

     

     

    And yet, frighteningly, our most glaring weakness was the offensive line, which none of the above are members of.

    • Fire 4
  11. How come we have a coach who is super intense, yet not a single player on the team ever reflects that intensity? When was the last time you saw a player on the sideline intensely motivating other guys? It doesn't happen.

     

    That's exaggerating a bit, but overall it is an interesting point. We have a bunch of guys that will supposedly run through brick walls for our coach. But running through a defensive tackle is a bit much to ask.

    • Fire 1
  12. That final quarter was a rush. It may have gone to your head. Michigan State pretty much dominated us. They have the better quarterback (and he didn't even play a great game), the better offensive line (by a lot), the better overall defense and the better coaching staff. We have Ameer and Gregory.

  13. Ill say one thing, I'm surprised by the Spartan fans, that stadium was a quarter empty for most of the game and half empty towards the end.

     

    It's a primetime game on ABC, ranked opponent, built up as the Big 10 game of the year going in, and they couldn't manage to get the students and other fans to fill up a stadium that isnt terribly big to begin with?

     

    Your team is the defending Big 10 and Rose bowl champions, how pathetic is that?

     

    You know what? It took everything in my power not to say, "F*** you, fans! F*** all you." F*** 'em. What a bunch of f***in' literally fair-weather f***in...

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Our guys showed some guts tonight.

  14. Two play calls in the first quarter that I felt were monumentally bad and swung the momentum.

     

    1. Punting from the MSU 31 yard line. Terrible call. If the wind was too much to try a field goal, go for it. The potential reward is huge and the risk minimal. Punting inside the 35 is playing not to lose and cringe-inducingly Ferentzesque.

     

    2. (On the first TD) Cover zero with your fourth or fifth best cornerback (Rose) in tight man coverage with their star WR (Lippett). Three really serious problems with this call that it doesn't take an Xs and Os mastermind to spot: First, cover zero is generally a bad idea unless they're in the red zone or you are supremely confident in the man coverage skills of every DB on the field. Second, Mitchell needed to be switched over to Lippett (they made this correction only after they were burned). And third, if you're going to stick Rose on Lippett in any circumstance, he should be playing 6-8 yards off. I wonder if Jim Bollman felt guilty taking candy from a baby.

    • Fire 2
  15. Beck does not trust his quarterback making reads in the passing game in big games. This is partially justified because we don't have very good passing quarterbacks. But on the the other hand, you have to take chances to beat very good teams.

     

    This has happened before with Beck. He comes out nervous and only calls short passes, usually to the sidelines and usually with few if any reads. In some ways this seems to be a self-fulfilling prophecy, since the quarterback surely realizes his OC has no faith in him, causing him to play tight and lose confidence.

     

    Then, when we fall behind by 3 or 4 scores and become desperate, Beck figures there is nothing to lose, loosens up and starts opening up the passing game. Voila! It actually works to some degree and we make some nice plays downfield. But unfortunately it's too little too late. And then we have to ponder, what if he just came out with that attitude to begin with? What if he fires down the middle of the field to Westy or Moore right after the turnover and goes up 7-0 with a confident QB? Sure, he risks Tommy not seeing a safety and throwing an interception. But looking at the alternative... it's a risk worth taking.

    • Fire 2
  16.  

     

     

    If Nebraska can go 13-0, they are in the playoff. If not, they aren't.

    I don't think that's necessarily true. If we're 11-1 playing another 11-1 team in the conference title game, the winner of that game has a good shot, regardless if what ESPN has to say.

    Technically possible, but a 12-1 Nebraska won't be ahead of a 12-1 Oregon, UCLA, Florida St. or an 11-1 Oklahoma or Baylor. They would need quite a few upsets.

    A 12-1 conference champion Nebraska would very likely be selected over any 11-1 non-champion. If there's 4 other conference champs with 1 loss or fewer, then we would have to worry about being snubbed, depending on SOS.

     

     

    The teams I mentioned would be conference champions, with one loss. A one-loss Nebraska would need one of the other champions to have at least two losses.

  17. The rankings have become garbage since the eSECpn era has come about. Most college football fans in TN believe whatever espn tells them. So when a team like Ole Miss comes along and the media pumps them as a top ten team no one questions them. It doesn't matter that they were 8-5 last year with a less than impressive win against Georgia tech in a bowl or the fact they have no credible wins this year. They must be good because they play in the best division in college football as all the media states. The media has to build up the sec west for bama to have a shot at the playoff given the chance they are a one loss team based off of SOS. If Nebraska was in the sec west with our record, we would be top 5 easy. Come November, the teams in the west will be thinning out and if we keep winning the rest will sort itself out. Imagine the chaos if we win out and ND beats Florida state. The sec all beat each other so no one is undefeated. Big 10, big 12, and maybe pac 12( ucla) are undefeated. Now make the case for a potentially undefeated notre dame or one loss acc vs a one loss sec. This year will be worse than all the bcs BS of years past IMO

     

     

    Why would normal college football fans across the nation care about Alabama vs Ole Miss? Surely no one would pay close attention, if any at all. But if you slap a little symbol and number like #11 next to Ole Miss, it starts up conversation, false anticipation and helps the TV tuners. I think it is obvious that college football fans are more intelligent than that anymore. Ole Miss and Miss State are now replacing the highly inaccurate estimation of South Carolina, Georgia, and LSU.

     

     

     

    GREAT NOW ESPN MADE OLE MISS BEAT ALABAMA! AND ALABAMA ISN'T EVEN GOOD, THEY WERE JUST RANKED #1 CUZ ESPN BRAINWASHED EVERYONE! BOYCOTT!

  18.  

    If Nebraska can go 13-0, they are in the playoff. If not, they aren't.

    I don't think that's necessarily true. If we're 11-1 playing another 11-1 team in the conference title game, the winner of that game has a good shot, regardless if what ESPN has to say.

     

     

    Technically possible, but a 12-1 Nebraska won't be ahead of a 12-1 Oregon, UCLA, Florida St. or an 11-1 Oklahoma or Baylor. They would need quite a few upsets.

×
×
  • Create New...