Nsa

Here is a opinion. You posts read as if you were high when you wrote them. Maybe you should call Bob Davie and share you wisdom, maybe you can convinvce him that he should have hired Coz. As for your Pellini, you not being serious are you?

I love the way you post, can't make an argument, rather than make some solid points, expose your adolescence and attempt to poke fun at posters usernames. Good job posting on the internet, you should be proud. I hope NU keeps hiring new defensive coordinators until they find one that can shut down teams and never, ever, ever lets the top ten teams win. Thank you. By-the-way...that was an argument...I give up, you are unbelievable. Just keep defending Coz while our Huskers can't defend anyone. And also by-the-way, I called you a rocket scientist, you called me adolescent, it's all the same so stop trying to act as though you are on some sort of higher intellectual plain. Also by-the-way, you seem to think you are an expert, but you have yet to offer any “solid” analysis, just excuses for the inexcusable. You obviously don’t like what I have to say, and I don’t think I ever responded to one of your original threads (if I did let me apologize now), so do me a favor, next time you see my name just skip over it. I really don’t need your opinion. I don't think I offered any excuses, I just pointed out that your criticisms of the DC were unfounded. Your claimed that a change defensive alignment was resulting in fewer sacks than last season, when in fact it is the same scheme as last season. You claimed that the scheme was ineffective against pass with USC and pointed to UCLA's scheme as a "good" D when in fact USC passed for more yards against UCLA. So don't go asking any favors from me when you are posting that a Nebraska coach "must go".

I don't see how it is unfair. Florida has 12 wins, Michigan 11. If teams lose their CCG and they drop, the should be allowed to rise as well. I certainly think NU going to the CCG helped them out this year, even with a loss.

I love the way you post, can't make an argument, rather than make some solid points, expose your adolescence and attempt to poke fun at posters usernames. Good job posting on the internet, you should be proud. I hope NU keeps hiring new defensive coordinators until they find one that can shut down teams and never, ever, ever lets the top ten teams win.

I never said Cosgrove is great and I don't recall saying Grixby was the problem or calling him out. I just think it is funny that you think if NU switched to rush ends, or even run McBrides D, suddenly they would be posting shut-outs.

It is a tough call, but while watching LSU slap ND around for 4 quarters might be fun to watch, I am not sure it deserves a #4 ranking.

So you think comparing NU's performance vs USC is comparable to UCLA's? Nope.

No, reread my post. I said you were under rating Moore. You aren't making any sense with your comparisons of Open end to Rush end. Whatever. USC played a horrible game, UCLA played lights out, who has the better season on D? Would you rather have UCLA's record or NU's? Whatever CAHusker, you obviously have some weird sense of self-entitlement to call out that a coach "must go". Good luck with that.

Did you call for McBrides head after ISU 1992? Anyway, I can't believe of any gripe you have it is the USC game.

Considering there are only 11 guys on each side of the ball, how does having two offensive players forced to play 1 defensive player put the offense in a better position? Seems it would be the opposite. Or even three offensive players, such during Missouri when Carriker was on the nose? The difference is that you are taking the best player and putting him in a double team situation. There are five offensive linemen, and four defensive linemen. Plus on the strong side, there is an extra blocker in the form of a tight end. So Carriker is always at a disadvantage. If you were going to switch him at all, why not put him in a one-on-one situation with a O-Tackle where he could get pressure on the QB every time. Then you wouldn’t have to rely on one of Coz’s wonderful delay blitzes to try to get to the QB. Carriker can eat up any O-lineman in the country one-on-one, but he rarely gets the chance with Coz’s scheme. My preference however is that he just let Moore and Carriker stay on one their own respective sides the way we did with Wistrom and Tomich as well as all of our other great D-end tandems. Coz has got to go! So you want to see more get blown up on every play? Not saying that he would, but your arguement makes little sense and I thinkyou are underating Moore. Carriker is bigger but slower, why do you think he is at base? Aren't you the same guy that was talking up UCLA's play call against USC? You never really responded about how those great schemes gave up more passing yards than Nebraska's D did.

NU ran the same alignment last season when they led the nation in sacks. Now if the D could get a little more out of the LB's, and the secondary, and I think that is where your sacks went, the LB's can't rely on the secondary and have to drop back and help them. Just because you don't have any understanding of something is no reason to call it stupid.

I think the term you are looking for is Base end and it is not new. He isn't intentionally lined up to be doubled teamed, but that is how it often ends up as a result of his gap responsibility, which Carriker is more suited too anyway, have you seen what the man can do when he is lined up at tackle? It is going to be either him or Moore. The D-line has been pretty effective as unit, I don't see what you are complaining about there.

I understand that your post is seething with sarcasm, good job! You point is lost on me, you don't like Cosgrove because of why? My only guess as the defense is not playing to your expectations. Please elaborate why you dislike the Base 4-3 that Cosgrove runs, is that what makes it inconsistent?

or, perhaps the schemes made them seem better than they were last year. And now that we've run out of ways to disguise the shortcomings, we are seeing them for what they really are... can you really say one way or the other? Could be, that and NU has some serious needs in secondary. I am sure as soon as one of those freshman gets burnt for TD, some would be screaming at Coz or Elmassian for playing the young guys rather than guys with experience.

They blitzed and kept pressure on USC? Nickel Packages? Maybe that is why USC pass for more yards against UCLA than Nebraska. Booty went 37-25 against NU and 39-23 against UCLA. Nice try.

What made McBride a good DC? Wistrom, Peter(s), Tomich, Farley, Veland, Minter, Williams , Booker. Yeah, NU hit the defensive recruiting trail hard, and yes McBride made some changes to his system from what he was running in the 80's. At Wisconsin the D was getting the left overs from the offense, that was Alverez's main concern was getting some O players, understandbly being were they have to recruit against. I think that you might see a little more out to Coz's D when NU can field a complete D, yes they have a strong front 4, but I don't think the LB's are as great as many would like to think, not saying they are slouches by any means, combine that with a secondary that was pieced together from nothing and you get results like this season. And actually they didn't do to poorly considering.