Jump to content


westgatehusker

Members
  • Posts

    785
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by westgatehusker

  1. All you people that complain about ESPN talking about our obession and getting overlooked. Please take a step back and think about what is going on here.

     

    No shyte!!! This is unreal...I'm guessing that ESPN got FLOODED with e-mails from people complaining Suh wasn't on there. He's closing in on the top 5. What is it worth??? 1 vote in the whole heisman balloting (which is roughly .1%) but still...

     

    ESPN definitely knows Nebraska fans are out there and that Suh is the 'posterchild' right now. I'm OK with it...and agree that I'm tired of "ESPN hates us" posts.

     

    That being said....ROCK THE VOTE!!! (Hope P-diddy and MTV don't SUH me!!!)

    Ya we didn't deserve their attention until this year. They don't hate us, as much as everybody would like to think, except maybe kirk.

  2. He doesnt get action at fullback because he plays DEFENSIVE TACKLE and WE HAVE FULLBACKS. Ive said this before...if we are going to put Suh at fullback then we might as well put Turner and the rest of the D-Line back there. Would anyone like to see that? I don't think so.

     

    What is the point of having a fullback on the team if you aren't going to use them? How do you think the current fullbacks feel when they work their a$$ off every day at practice and then ride the pine while some defensive player goes in for them.

     

    Sorry but I didn't like it before and I don't like it now.

    The only reason to put him in at fullback is his athleticism.

    I don't care who works the hardest, or how they feel. Put the players on the field that give you the best chance to win. (not saying this is the case here)

  3. Unless I was mistaken it wasn't even reviewed. They reviewed the play in the booth but that was a review of the fumble, there's a rule somewhere where official reviews look for one specific thing and can't deviate even if they find another error.

    That is only the case if a play is challenged, not if it is simply reviewed without a challenge. Keep in mind, every play is reviewed. They stop the game if it can be potentially overturned.

  4. Posted on: October 9, 2009 at 00:00:59 CT

    MarshallPaulding MU

    Posts:

    296

    Member For:

    4.74 yrs

    Level:

    User 4.74 yrs

    M.O.B. Votes:

    0

    yes it sucks we lost, however I think our biggest defender was the rain tonight. Excuses, yes, but this team does not have a running identity and the rain killed the passing game for both teams but mainly Mizzou. Hats off to NU for exploiting it. Suh, notice how he was 5 yards downfield when he made the pick...overrated if you ask me. Just a fatass who is on the right place at the right time. Gabbert, not as good as weeks past but not as bad as tonight. It will be okay. KU will beat this sorry team and we will beat KU.

     

    Meth is a hell of a drug...

    You might have a point

  5. Trying to be as unbiased as possible I would say that yes he was down, however I'm not sure it was enough to overturn the initial call.

    That, however, does not compare at all to the calls made that gave missouri their field goal: First the hands to the face, the horsecollar, the obvious holding not called, and then the receiver who was out of bounds.

     

    ...Wow, the big XII should give those refs a talking to.

     

    Missouri could have put in another 10,000 seats with all the money the boosters gave those refs.

    :)

  6. How in the world does a play who has been here for almost a year and a half only know 15 plays? Is this just a cover up by the coaches because they just want Zach Lee to play? If Cody Green truly only knows 15 plays then that is very bad coaching in my opinion. They should sit him down in a film room and force him to learn the play book inside and out before practicing again.

    Oh geez, I replied to your last thread thinking you were sincere. I guess you are just a mizzou troll.

×
×
  • Create New...