rocketlb

Can you picture Tommy Lee, of Motly Crue, in a marching band uniform??

Weird huh!?

Also, he is trying out for the drumline in the band. If he makes it (like he won't) he is going to be marching in the Baylor game next week. FYI

I agree. but what's the rule on redshirts? If panico is returning punts, which scares the hell right out of me by the way , can he still redshirt?

Who knew in 1791, you would be using the Constitution to settle INternet Cases.

Obviously Thomas Jefferson did. (sarcasm)

I meant more of the bill of rights, my fault.

Callahan and staff don't believe in redshirts.

Nah...They just don't know how to use them. See'n how most of them have been in a redshirt free environment for the last few years.

who the hell is talking about laws?

I'm talking about our RIGHTS as citizens of the United States of America. Hence, "The Bill of Rights". And not "The Bill of Laws". Thank god.

By passing bans on guns, I think we're creating a false sense of security. In the process of creating this false sense of security we're giving up our freedoms. I for one enjoy having my freedoms, I don't know about you.

You have to again look at what constituted the milita in those days. Essentially, it was any able-bodied man called upon by the state to serve - so, essentially, they were considered one and the same at that time. And each man was expected to contribute his own rifle.

 

That's not the case today, with the National Guard's existance. The militia is organized and provisioned by the State.

IT DOESN'T MATTER!!!

Like I said, the constitution is not meant to be interpreted. If they didn't mean exactly what they said, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have put it into such a highly regarded document.

Personally, I think that any sort of ban on arms is wrong. It goes against what our fore-fathers set into the costitution/bill of rights. We should not be trying to "interperut" the constitution/bill of rights. They said what they meant, and they meant exactly what they said.

Also, if the "Bad Guys" want and assault weapon....guess what...they'll get one. It doesn't matter if you make it illegal or not. i.e. killing people is illegal, but that doesn't stop them does it?

IMO all of the talk about letting the ban expire being bad is unfounded. I mean honestly, what did the ban actually accomplish? All it did was make it illegal to own SCARY LOOKING guns. The only thing that actually made a little sense was the part banning collapsable stocks. And that's only because it makes it easier to concele rifles, shotguns, etc.

So basically all I'm saying is...Who gives a sh#t?!?!

Well....I would consider that rebuilding, wouldn't you?

Attendance: 40,133

Definitely not used to seeing a number this low. Pitt must have some great fans.

Yeah I follow. But it seems stupid to have SOS in the formula more than once...IDK.

Blackshirt:

I would think so too, but remember looking at the BCS Rankings? They had the different catagories; comp. rank, poll avg., quality wins, SOS, Losses, etc. They took everything out, except the comp. rank and poll avgerage. At least that's the way I understood it.

I believe when they overhauled the BCS they simplified it so that it doesn't take SS into account. I think the only things it uses are the two major polls and the computer rankings.

Considering how I got this information, I wouldn't trust it that much....

But, I heard from a friend of mine who used to work at gallop with people that knew incognito that he was into cocain, which would explain his anger problem. But once again, I don't know how reliable that information is.