Jump to content


Sker4Ever

Members
  • Posts

    512
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sker4Ever

  1. I always hear people say we have no identity. We actually do, it's just not a positive one. On a real note we need to understand who we are and where we are. Take a note from Wisconsin, Stanford, Ga Tech, and understand that you don't have the athletes to run the schemes we are trying to run. Recruit smart, do a couple things well, and do them over and over and over again. That is a formula we can win with

  2. I always hear people say we have no identity. We actually do, it's just not a positive one. On a real note we need to understand who we are and where we are. Take a note from Wisconsin, Stanford, Ga Tech, and understand that you don't have the athletes to run the schemes we are trying to run. Recruit smart, do a couple things well, and do them over and over and over again. That is a formula we can win with

  3. I actually thought the kid looked somewhat like my son. Didn't realize he was "famous."

     

    d98f0f84b5ec92859844638513c2aa35_crop_no

     

    That image, of course, is of the Kliff Kingsbury kid. No, not the child of the Texas Tech coach, but rather the kid who dressed up as Kingsbury's spitting image last Halloween.

     

    a76e8dc3dbb5ddd6e0fb82ef7b4bf1ef_crop_ex

     

    Link

     

     

    Liked the Jay Cutler smoking pic myself.

    I like how in they changed the UA logo to an Adidas logo. Silly clothing company rules

    • Fire 2
  4.  

    Anybody else want to see this guy on the field more? Seems like every time I've seen him out there this year, whether on special teams or subbed in at LB he makes an impact. I don't understand why he isn't getting more playing time when last year he was most likely a starter before his injury. He looks explosive and he plays fast, something that our LBs have trouble doing at times. Let's get this guy on the field, he could really help this unit out. Santos to me is somewhat of a liability. Kid tries hard but athletically its not there.

    Obviously he's not doing something right in practice or he WOULD be on the field more.

     

    Just because a position may not be up to par at the starter position doesn't mean the back ups are better. It's why they are back ups in the first place. I don't understand this position of. "This guy can't get it done, let's put the back up in to see if he can do it" when it's obvious he isn't performing in practice due to depth chart.

     

    I hope I repeated myself enough to make the point.

     

    My point isn't being made solely based on the fact that I don't like the guy at the position. My point is based on what I've seen (Player A) do in the first 3 games compared to what I've seen (Player B) do in the first 3 games. Seems logical to me

  5. Anybody else want to see this guy on the field more? Seems like every time I've seen him out there this year, whether on special teams or subbed in at LB he makes an impact. I don't understand why he isn't getting more playing time when last year he was most likely a starter before his injury. He looks explosive and he plays fast, something that our LBs have trouble doing at times. Let's get this guy on the field, he could really help this unit out. Santos to me is somewhat of a liability. Kid tries hard but athletically its not there.

  6. I like NU's partnership with Adidas. Nike has "too many" schools under their belt, and NU wouldn't be special like they are with Adidas.

     

    Personally I would like Under Armour, but Adidas isn't bad and their clothes are comfortable and classy

×
×
  • Create New...