huzkerbob

Unfortunatley I think this means Frost will never coach at NU. He should have considered it a better opportunity than what he did.

Why is that exactly? Maybe I missed something, but I don't recall hearing about Frost having any involvement in the wrong doing happening inside Oregon's FB program. If being a member of the same staff as a coach who was skirting the rules was enough to permanently damage someones reputation then there would be an a**load of D1 coaches out of work right now.

..... Just ask Luke Fickell

Too gimmicky....

 

Game? seriously dude, you all gonna need a miracle to even put a team on the field by the time Iowa gets to you. Then on top of that our "new" qb should be about ready to unleash the cannon, whoops that got your head spinning, well wait, it gets better, Coker, our back runs around 230 pounds. Oh but he is slow, you say. I invite you to watch him shread Missery's back field. Mark my words. Iowas O next year will be as bad as Wiskeys O last year. The D will take a hit but hey we have been ranked like in the top ten for most years since 2000 or so. So a slide on D to even, oh I dont know 20th and a high powered O, sounds good to me. Don't kid yourself Iowa does not rebuild anymore.

Damn boy, you drunk?

O.N.N. reports on the death of the american dream.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGPD0ZBiMs0&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AZn5nWIj_g&feature=related

how much do you think that bo changing his defensive scheme this year will affect how we play against the pass? last year our main goal was defending the pass since we were in a pass heavy conference, but in the big ten you almost have to sell out to defend the run, and that usually means that the dbacks will cheat up and then get beat. i know that bo will have the guys ready to play, but idk if he can run as complex defensive coverage schemes playing a true 4-3 instead of the peso

I highly doubt NU will be running anything that could be called a true 4-3 next year. Unless someone steps up big over the summer, the lack depth at LB makes that pretty unlikely. Besides that would be rather uncharacteristic of a Pelini lead defense IYAM.

I don't doubt at all is that Bo will be running a complex scheme in the Big10. Why? Because underneath it all, Bo's a complex man.....

Holy sh#t, that has to be one the biggest hatchet pieces I've ever seen! And who's the author we have to thank for it........ FS SOUTHWEST STAFF. Huh? Way to take ownership fellas.

Knapplc has a need. A need for speed!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3yJMzIL7VI

I would not pay more than $100 for a ticket. You see a FINE game on TV, and you could buy a lot of beer and chips for the party for $100. It would have to be a tremendous game for me to even consider spending anything upwards of $75. I'm just not that in love with the experience in the stadium.

Says the guy who's parents have season tickets....

Stealing the info of 100 million people kinda precludes you from 'going on to do legit things.' This is felony territory, they have forfeited their futures.

 

For a minute there I thought you were talking about Zuckerburg. I suppose tricking people to willingly give it up and selling it is different. How different is allowing apps to steal it through shoddy APIs though?

 

You didn't quantify it as hackers who steal > (some #) of personal informations need to have their hands cut off to kill their hacking careers and end their love lives. Whats that number? Should the random chan kid using LOIC as part of the crowd still qualify even though they don't have the knowledge to do anything more advanced yet? Seemed like they did before. I do agree that carders crossed the line into federal prison territory rather then going legit later. Although that won't be the case if they are caught, they'll probably get to work for the secret service like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Gonzalez because those groups are hard to infiltrate. Then they'll lock them up after they do something high profile again under the secret service's watch.

 

Complaining about stereotyping is not even a tad hypocritical. Here we have "all hackers should have their hands cut off." Where's the line between carders, hacker, hacktivist, script kiddies, or someone who can run a program and enter an ip address to flood a website? It's not all the same group attacking Sony (who is just as evil as anyone under those labels). You do know Sony is a company that has a history of among (many) other things installing root kits on unsuspecting people's computers through music CDs just a few years ago, right? What are we supposed to do with their hands? Also it isn't hackers that took the PSN down, its Sony and the Credit Card companies that are auditing them now to decide whether Sony gets to keep their merchant status. Since Sony obviously didn't have the system admin staff good enough to know who got in, how, where, or what they took not to mention prevent it in the first place.

 

Its a good thing you guys weren't around for IRC wars and crap in the 90s where if someone didn't like what someone else said or what they did to them they'd simply take them or their ISP offline for a few hours and they didn't need a bot net to do it because you could spoof a ping request to a broadcast and turn entire networks into unwitting flooders. Imagine trying to play CoD where if you were good enough to piss someone off they could send a single packet to your pc and freeze it requiring a reboot. Which only fixed it until windows got another one of those packets and those vulnerabilities were around and unpatched for months or years. The entire internet would be at defcon5 of nerd-rage then. Point is these things, while inconvenient and a pita, have to happen for things to get better. The fact that it happened to Sony is just poetic justice, couldn't have happened to a bigger a-hole evil corporation. Hopefully some of their customers realize who they are dealing with now.

Unlike Microsoft? Because we all know they're a bunch a saints in starched shirts and penny loafers....

For those not in the know, this is all just eSpin working their magic. There is absolutely nothing new that has come out that the NCAA didn't already know 4-5 months ago.

Does that change the fact that OSU has been caught cheating on multiple occasions? No. So exactly when the violations occurred or how long the NCAA has known about them doesn't really matter much does it? Fan or not, I think your kidding yourself if you think OSU hasn't been kicking their dirt under a rug for a number of years now.* Seems to me it's past time the NCAA stepped up and played the role of maid if that's what it takes to insure the Bucks finally clean house.

* Here's a link to an ESPN article written over six years ago if you need a little reminder.

Edit: Man, some of those old accusations seem eerily familiar don't they?

 

 

Wasn't there an epic thread about T-Mart's "interview ability"

If by "epic" you mean as mind-numbingly monotonous and full of the ol' brown water as this one, then yes there sure was.

Generally speaking, "breaking the law/violating rules of conduct" means you can and usually will lose your job immediately, and without remedy.

Maybe so, but this is CFB we're talking about. Not exactly a hotbed for "by the book" behavior and/or punishment..................

I'm not usually the type to get worked up over fancy artistic renderings, but must say that's one sexy buildin'!

I agree with you. The old logo was more intimidating, for lack of a better word. The new logo looks computer generated. I had this old Husker pullover jacket that I bought in Fremont back in the mid 90's. I think it was made by Logo Athletic. Anybody remember that brand? It was pretty much all black, except for the back which had a big N with the word Huskers written in black. I can't tell you all the compliments I got when I wore it. You could see it a mile away.

yeah, nothing is more intimidating than your logo written in swirly cursive like grandma used to write...

Seriously?

There aren't enough facepalms on the interwebz to describe how sad and ridiculous those numbers are.......