steross

OSU 8 penalties for 84 yards NU 7 penalties for 55 yards Not included in the NU total was a hard hit to the helmet that was later given a suspension on a touchdown play. Included in the OSU total was a soft hit to the helmet that did not phase the offensive player but converted a critical 3rd down incompletion. The penalties at tonight's aTm game were lop-sided in amount and the one roughing the passer or whatever they called was a horrible call. But to decide from that there is a conspiracy in the league is nuts. So, do you think the league officials got together and said, "We will show that NU, we will penalize them a lot. Except, when they go on the road to the undefeated Big 12 south leader. There, we will make some calls that are distinctly in their advantage. That will show em! We will make them lose a bunch but win the most important one for the league." Looking at that, you have to admit the conspiracy theory is not logical. It would have made sense to call back the huge runback and let a tap to the QB helmet go if you were trying to punish a team. Like much of government, the craziness may seem like conspiracy, but it is probably just incompetence.

Oklahoma State fan here. I don't typically spend much time on other team's boards but I registered just to say that Suh should be the heisman winner without a doubt. The Heisman is supposed to be awarded to the most outstanding player this year. While the other candidates are great players, Suh is clearly the most outstanding. I haven't ever seen a defensive tackle dominate in so many ways. And I have heard several commentators say "and I have never seen...." about Suh. Any other candidates been mentioned that way this year? Not that I have seen. No matter who wins the popularity contest, he is the best player.