Jump to content


Lil' Red

Members
  • Posts

    1,516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lil' Red

  1.  

     

    Additionally, even if all the Stein voters had voted for Clinton (or vice versa), Trump still would have won. Neither of our votes ended up mattering in the end.

     

    Actually, that's not true. Stein had more votes than Trump's margin of victory in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

     

    Unless there's more up-to-date numbers I'm not seeing, Stein's votes to Clinton would have only swung Wisconsin and Michigan but not Pennsylvania, which would have been a 52 electoral vote swing, but Trump won by 74.

     

    I believe these are the official results from the Pennsylvania Department of State and they show that she would have won Pennsylvania with Stein's votes. The NY times results match those results and were more recently updated than Politico's results.

  2. Additionally, even if all the Stein voters had voted for Clinton (or vice versa), Trump still would have won. Neither of our votes ended up mattering in the end.

     

    Actually, that's not true. Stein had more votes than Trump's margin of victory in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

    • Fire 1
  3.  

    Why?

     

    A vote for the Green Party presidential candidate is a vote trashed. Such voters often cite 'purity' as their justification for throwing their vote away. He's not targeting the Green platform in any way, though he may well disagree with it. But these two comments seem consistent to me for his argument for voting pragmatically rather than idealistically.

    You don't see how Savage is doing the same thing of ostracizing people who aren't in his camp?

     

    You are making a pretty giant leap to conclude that a Green vote is a trash vote. By that logic, can't I say that a vote for Clinton was a trash vote because she didn't win?

     

    And if you are truly a practical voter, then shouldn't all the practical liberals join the "pure" voters on the left as that's the best chance to win? That's what being practical means, right?

     

     

    Even if all the voters that preferred the Green candidate to the Republican candidate voted for the Green candidate, they still wouldn't win. I'm pretty far left and I probably wouldn't vote for Jill Stein over someone like Romney.

  4. 81% of America lives in urban or suburban settings. We are not a rural folk, and we need to stop pretending to be. Gerrymandering has artificially controlled how people get elected, which in turn affects our laws.

     

    Rural America is a huge place. There just aren't a lot of people living there.

     

    The democrats need to focus on suburban voters more so than rural voters. Suburban voters (which Trump won) are more likely to swing than rural voters and they comprise nearly half of the total population.

    • Fire 1
  5. Theresa May will likely stay on as PM, but her position has been considerably compromised.

     

    If they weren't in the process of negotiating Brexit, I'd just about guarantee that she'd be gone by now. However, holding a leadership election at the same time that Brexit negotiations are beginning is not a good position to be in.

  6. And at the recommendation of Sessions who had said he wouldn't play in this sand box.

    Also at the recommendation of the Deputy AG who has been on the job for about two weeks...

  7.  

    Ok, so many of us feel that the 2020 election can't get here soon enough. It is never to early to start speculation.

     

    This article throws out the same of California Sen. Kamala Harris. Could she be the savior of the Dem party - a new generation, a female and daughter of immigrants from Jamaica and India.

    She is making all of the early moves to get noticed while politically denying any interest (sure sign she is interested in DC speak).

     

     

    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article149309374.html

     

    Vito Chiesa, a registered Republican who chairs the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors in California, said he tried to get a meeting with Harris in Washington.

    “She’s in such demand,” he said. “She’s kind of a chosen one.”

    Harris is the charismatic daughter of immigrants from Jamaica and India. Obama called her brilliant and “by far the best looking attorney general in the country” (he later apologized for what was deemed a sexist remark). She seemingly has the ingredients to energize the Democratic base, and her next tasks if she runs are centered in two places: Washington and the rest of America.

     

     

    Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article149309374.html#storylink=cpy

    One of my problems with all these candidates is that the discussion is about them and their personality traits. But what policies do they support?

    Unfortunately, personality seems to be more important than policy when it comes to electability.

    • Fire 2
×
×
  • Create New...