Search the Community

2008 Virginia Tech - NU: 2, VAtech: 0................L #4 Missouri - NU: 2, MU: 0.........................L #7 Texas Tech - NU: 0, TT: 2......................L #4 Oklahoma - NU: 4, OU: 1.......................L, Clemson - NU: 3, Clemson: 2.....................W 2009 #13 Virginia Tech - NU: 2, VAtech: 0........L #24 Missouri - NU: 2, MU: 3.......................W Texas Tech - NU: 2, TT: 0...........................L Iowa State - NU: 8, IS: 0..............................L #20 Oklahoma - NU: 1, OU: 5....................W #3 Texas - NU: 3, TX: 3...............................L #22 Arizona - NU: 0, AZ: 1.........................W 2010 Texas - NU: 1, TX: 0...................................L # 17 OK State - NU: 1, OKS: 1...................W #7 Missouri - NU: 0, MU: 1.........................W #18 Texas A&M - NU: 2, A&M: 0...............L #10 Oklahoma - NU: 4, OU: 1.....................L Washington - NU: 2, WU: 0.........................L 2011 #7 Wisconsin - NU: 3, WI: 1........................L #9 Michigan State - NU: 1, MSU: 1...........W Northwestern - NU: 1, NW: 1.......................L #12 Penn State - NU: 1, PS: 1...................W #20 Michigan - NU: 3, MU: 1.......................L #10 South Carolina - NU: 2, SC: 0.............L 2012 #16 UCLA - NU: 2, UCLA: 1.......................L #22 Wisconsin - NU: 2, WI: 1.....................W #12 Ohio State - NU: 4, OSU: 1.................L #20 Michigan - NU: 2, MI: 3........................W Wisconsin - NU: 3, WI: 0..............................L #6 Georgia - NU: 3, UG: 2...........................L 2013 #16 UCLA - NU: 1, UCLA: 1.........................L Minnesota - NU:2, Minn: 0...........................L #16 Michigan State - NU: 5, MS:0................L Iowa - NU:3, Iowa: 0.....................................L

Turnovers have pledged the Huskers throughout the Pelini Era. I read an article that evaluates (and illustrates) the turnover rate at Nebraska since 1988, with particular attention to last year. Here is the link: http://dataomaha.com...-slippery-slope The obvious question is, first, how does Bo turn this trend around? Is there something specific about the current offensive scheme that facilitates turnovers? Also, no one wants turnovers and I know it is controversial to ask, but how much is it hurting their ability to win games (they have been at 9-4, 10-4 records from 2008-2012, the same time the turnover margin has gone from +5 to -12)? Maybe a better way of asking this question is, how much better would you except the Husker record to be if they could get their turnover margin to be positive, or at least even?