Neither team should be getting any national press. UCLA hasn't won a conference championship since 1998 and Nebraska hasn't won a conference championship since 1999. I don't think the national press will be covering two teams that haven't won a conference title this century.Not surprising. Reading around on national reaction from our win, and there really isn't any. UCLA has gotten just about as much press beating Rice.
You took some abuse for this post...Neither team should be getting any national press. UCLA hasn't won a conference championship since 1998 and Nebraska hasn't won a conference championship since 1999. I don't think the national press will be covering two teams that haven't won a conference title this century.Not surprising. Reading around on national reaction from our win, and there really isn't any. UCLA has gotten just about as much press beating Rice.
Yet.... were you to ask fans across the United States --- fans who have no alliance with either UCLA or Nebraska --- if you were to ask them if your statement is correct and reflects reality... I'd guess 85-90% would say you were spot on. UCLA and NU are not any longer national-level programs of interest --- just historic programs that have not been relevant on the national scene for a decade (or, in the case of UCLA, much longer than that). But for NU fans and UCLA fans it is a good and interesting game... even if nationally it is but a meaningless game.
So... I think anyway --- for what it is worth --- that your post was perfectly fine and reflective of reality.
Still... we care. GBR.