There should be no talk of offering longevity to our current coaches based on their results so far. In fact their results so far should put them squarely on the hot seat next year. Time to stop making excuses.
Cool. Good thing there isn't.
There should be no talk of offering longevity to our current coaches based on their results so far. In fact their results so far should put them squarely on the hot seat next year. Time to stop making excuses.
Cool. Good thing there isn't.
You didn't even make it one comment on this thread without being proven wrong.
Comment No 75 of THIS thread... the comment right after yours...
"In addition, Riley could finish 5-7 next season (entirely possible) and he's not going anywhere. Eichorst will never fire him, because that would reflect negatively on him.
Nebraska has been clueless for the last 20 years on how to hire and oversee coaches.
You know that's not the narrative,So....Alabama gives their coaches 4 years to win an NC period...and but, Neb Nebraska should only give them two before everyone should be pissed off we haven't won an NCraska was smart to give Osborne 22 years.
Especially some that post on forums all the timeThere should be no talk of offering longevity to our current coaches based on their results so far. In fact their results so far should put them squarely on the hot seat next year. Time to stop making excuses.
Cool. Good thing there isn't.
You didn't even make it one comment on this thread without being proven wrong.
Comment No 75 of THIS thread... the comment right after yours...
"In addition, Riley could finish 5-7 next season (entirely possible) and he's not going anywhere. Eichorst will never fire him, because that would reflect negatively on him.
Nebraska has been clueless for the last 20 years on how to hire and oversee coaches.
First of all, the quote you just offered isn't talk about offering longevity - it's conjecture of what they believe to already be true.
Secondly, your "there should be no talk offering longevity" bit is in regards to the fanbase? Who the hell cares what fans talk about? There are some Alabama fans that want to fire Nick Saban because he doesn't win by big enough margins. Fans are idiots.
It's not? He is all pissy and ripping on the staff basically claiming they suck and should be on the hot seat after two years because we aren't winning NCs. He claims we need to be like Alabama who fires every coach they have if they haven't won an NC in 4 years. He claims there is absolutely a brick wall about that. Win an NC in 4 years or you are GONE. But, he also claims TO shouldn't have been fired after 4 years.You know that's not the narrative,So....Alabama gives their coaches 4 years to win an NC period...and but, Neb Nebraska should only give them two before everyone should be pissed off we haven't won an NCraska was smart to give Osborne 22 years.
I am sorry but I don't think Riley will go 11-1 next yearGBRFAN said:the guy had 6 losses in 2015 and 6 losses in 2014 - "he sucks - what a joke"
oh wait he had 1 loss in 2016 - Come to NU
Are we really going to say that he is that good? Let's see what his 3 year record is after MR gets his 3rd year. Because if you compare first 2 years MR looks equal or 1 game better.
You're seriously basing the attitude of what the program does by what a fan says on a message board?There should be no talk of offering longevity to our current coaches based on their results so far. In fact their results so far should put them squarely on the hot seat next year. Time to stop making excuses.
Cool. Good thing there isn't.
You didn't even make it one comment on this thread without being proven wrong.
Comment No 75 of THIS thread... the comment right after yours...
"In addition, Riley could finish 5-7 next season (entirely possible) and he's not going anywhere. Eichorst will never fire him, because that would reflect negatively on him.
Nebraska has been clueless for the last 20 years on how to hire and oversee coaches.
Of course BRB knows that's not the narrative.You know that's not the narrative,So....Alabama gives their coaches 4 years to win an NC period...and but, Neb Nebraska should only give them two before everyone should be pissed off we haven't won an NCraska was smart to give Osborne 22 years.
Did you seriously just say "If you're a NC winning coach, Alabama makes you stay! If you're not successful, you're gone."Alabama has won 11 (going on 12) National Championships since 1958.According to the majority of Bama fans I know online and in person, Curry didn't love the pressure of the Bama job, was going to interview with Kentucky while his stock was rising and was told if he did that he wouldn't be welcomed back. He did anyway, he got the job, and the rest was history.If you think those coaches were NOT fired... then I have ocean front property to sell you in Nebraska.
Look at the lame excuses you gave for them "leaving". "Didn't like his new contract"... ? Yeah right.
If Alabama had wanted Bill Curry to continue as head coach then they would have "given him a contract he did like". Same with the other coaches that Alabama fired.
Stop being naïve.
That's the only excuse I gave. Perkins, who followed in the shadow of Bear Bryant, voluntarily left. Franchioni, who was trending upward, voluntarily left. One not-garbage coach was ~maybe~ forced to resign, but probably not.
This doesn't exactly back up the narrative you're trying to push of Alabama being some uber cutthroat program that Nebraska isn't.
If a coach wins National Championships for Alabama... then Alabama makes sure you (coaches) stay at Alabama.
If you don't... you're gone. And in short order (4 years or less). Period
Stop being naïve.