Again, Eric Crouch.
Say wha....? For the record, what's a physic? :blink:
sorry was in a rush. you can say that the odds are against it i guess we will just have to find out. I just dont like that fact that they are already saying he will be replaced at mid-season and that he will have a crappy year and the season has not even started yet.
The difference is that the previous poster said he will be a 4 year starter. That's premature. I said he could be replaced. That's simply a possibility, along with the injury possibility taking him out. And I also said that I'm not on the band wagon that says he should be replaced. I didn't put any odds on it. How you call BS on me and call me a psychic, well, that's your mistake.
Alright i will admit i read too much into ur post but i have seen alot of people say that stuff and sometimes it gets to me that some people just dont want him to prove them wrong. My bad man.
Well obviously anyone thinking that Taylor will be replaced at midseason is wrong. A Sith Lord could use his lightsaber and cut Taylor's legs off and Bo would still put him out there as the #1 QB. After taping him up of course. Contrary to what Bo or Beck says publically this coaching staff has zero confidence in Brion. Now if Brion plays this season more than he did last season I'll be wrong but I don't think that'll be the case.
Sorry, but balance does not necessarily mean multiple at all. Maybe (I pray), it means a core set for run and passing formations. "Not" trying to use every possible scheme imaginable on a random basis (Callawatt's dream offense).I have no idea why everyone still thinks we were too multiple last year. If anything we weren't enough, and Bo has said he wants more balance (so there!)
It seems like little more than carryover pessimism from a previous era, complete with carryover catchphrases to criticize, while having little in common with reality.
:facepalm:
Sorry, but balance does not necessarily mean multiple at all. Maybe (I pray), it means a core set for run and passing formations. "Not" trying to use every possible scheme imaginable on a random basis (Callawatt's dream offense).I have no idea why everyone still thinks we were too multiple last year. If anything we weren't enough, and Bo has said he wants more balance (so there!
It seems like little more than carryover pessimism from a previous era, complete with carryover catchphrases to criticize, while having little in common with reality.
I sure hope not.Sorry, but balance does not necessarily mean multiple at all. Maybe (I pray), it means a core set for run and passing formations. "Not" trying to use every possible scheme imaginable on a random basis (Callawatt's dream offense).I have no idea why everyone still thinks we were too multiple last year. If anything we weren't enough, and Bo has said he wants more balance (so there!
It seems like little more than carryover pessimism from a previous era, complete with carryover catchphrases to criticize, while having little in common with reality.
Callabeckwats?