NuPolo8

So explain to me how calling someone a self righteous prick and an a-hole is NOT breaking any board rules.
Calling someone a prick in the regular forums is a violation of the board rules. In September of 2013, I called KJ a prick. I remember this because I received a PM about it, consequences, and it is still reflected in my Warning Points.

 
So explain to me how calling someone a self righteous prick and an a-hole is NOT breaking any board rules.
Well for one, it's in the 'shed.

two, I'm pretty sure I did it when he was here, saying it to him. So I didnt exactly fall under the "talkin sh#t when he's not here" category. You can call names in the shed. Happens all the time. You cant make threats.

 
So explain to me how calling someone a self righteous prick and an a-hole is NOT breaking any board rules.
Well for one, it's in the 'shed.
two, I'm pretty sure I did it when he was here, saying it to him. So I didnt exactly fall under the "talkin sh#t when he's not here" category. You can call names in the shed. Happens all the time. You cant make threats.
I already acknowledged the point. And just because you did it while he was here, he's not now and yet you continue. It's a d!(k move in my opinion.
 
So explain to me how calling someone a self righteous prick and an a-hole is NOT breaking any board rules.
Well for one, it's in the 'shed.
two, I'm pretty sure I did it when he was here, saying it to him. So I didnt exactly fall under the "talkin sh#t when he's not here" category. You can call names in the shed. Happens all the time. You cant make threats.
I already acknowledged the point. And just because you did it while he was here, he's not now and yet you continue. It's a d!(k move in my opinion.
Maybe so. But it wasnt something out of the blue. I was expanding on Hedley's comment of how he shares numerous views of the program with Polo, insinuating that's not the problem. I explained that. I explained that it most wasnt his view but how he portrayed them. How many threads were derailed into fire Bo discussion by his borderline trolling? And in doing so, I said it like it is. A lot of times he came off as a self riteous prick. While Hedley had numerous negative views, I have seen him in that light for well over a year now.

 
And for the record, i dont even know what self riteous means or if it's even the correct term. But i think it sounds badass and sophisticatingly offensive.
default_laugh.png


 
I think the difference between Polo and other posters who would disagree with you is that if you meet a poster at a tailgate you can have a friendly exchange about your debate and leave with a different idea of them.

Polo came off as not wanting to give someome the time of day if he didnt share your opinion. I never met him and could be off base here, but I would be happy to discuss things face to face, exchange ideas and have a friendly conversation. I dont get that vibe from him. It seems once he has decided he disagrees with you and you dont cave, thats it

 
As do I at this point. But it was never about Polo's views. It wasnt his message. It was his delivery and timing. As has been stated multiple times already. He on many occasions acted like a self riteous prick. Yet, those who have met him stick up for him and say how cool he is. That's fine. Not gonna fault that. But I havent met him in person. All I know is the a-hole I see on here. What if I told you that Landlord is a pretty cool dude. Seriously. Same with Minny. EZ and I bullsh#t text all the time. EZ's pretty cool in person. And so is True and Crewe and Knapp. GrillonGrill. All these guys I've met in person MoHusker. And I'll vouch for all them. But I bet there's many people who havent met them that cant stand them based on their comments here. This is the issue for many with Polo. And his message is all they have. And in many instances, was against the rules of the forum.
pretty much...

Oh, and I am a d!(k...

 
Back
Top