SuperBigFan69
Head Coach
Is it that you think his teams played dirty and the cameras would have "got him" for that or something?And it’s evolved since then. It’s a major part of the game now.
Is it that you think his teams played dirty and the cameras would have "got him" for that or something?And it’s evolved since then. It’s a major part of the game now.
I think this is the best concise analysis of Bo's coaching. With more self control and willingness to adjust, I think he could have been a great coach. There was a lot to like about him. But he had some serious flaws that really placed a ceiling on the team.
If he gets to that level of success, he does not have the temperament that was Pelini's biggest flaw: He is passionate but he clearly can control himself. So if he gets to that level of success, I'd see him hitting higher levels than that. And goodness knows we all have waited a long time for that.I think there is a level of winning where you're basically untouchable, and can be unnecessarily combative without it risking your job. Bo clearly wasn't quite there.
I think if Rhule starts winning 9 or 10 every year then he'll be able to coach here as long as he wants. He's not going to make his job harder than it has to be by burning every bridge in sight.
How was it not a major part of the game in, say, 2011?
It was fine at the time. But my opinion of the style of a Bo coached is team was emotional and reactionary and not so much disciplined and consistent. Things that might not pass intense video scrutiny.Is it that you think his teams played dirty and the cameras would have "got him" for that or something?
So the replay rules have evolved since then? Their scope hasn’t increased every year?Or, you know, 2009....
The emotion was something that both was a strength and weakness of his teams. When they were on, they were on. When they were off, they were off.It was fine at the time. But my opinion of the style of a Bo coached is team was emotional and reactionary and not so much disciplined and consistent. Things that might not pass intense video scrutiny.
It was fine at the time. But my opinion of the style of a Bo coached is team was emotional and reactionary and not so much disciplined and consistent. Things that might not pass intense video scrutiny.
After further review...#34 was in fact crying and is ejected from the game."Being emotional" is not a reviewable play, so we still don't know what the hell you're talking about.
Who’s 34?After further review...#34 was in fact crying and is ejected from the game.
So the replay rules have evolved since then? Their scope hasn’t increased every year?
I don't know, I am not good with numbers...or letters.Who’s 34?
Who’s 34After further review...#34 was in fact crying and is ejected from the game.
how much does credit does Bo deserve for Suh, who was recruited by Callahan. Suh would have developed himself.I think it is fair to say that fans have a hard time giving Bo credit for two reasons.
1. He did not want to give us HJ's while looking into our eyes and telling us that we were the best fans ever.
2. He got his a$$ handed to him like 5-6 different times.
With that said there are just a FEW things that could have and should have changed it all.
1. No time should have been put back on the clock vs UT. We know the ball hits the ground with about a second left but the guy in the bad khaki pants blocks the view so we never actually see it hit the ground. The ref assumed (rightfully so because of physics) that the ball hit the ground but that is not how replay works. You either do see it happen or you do not. They finish the season with 11 wins.
2. Suh should have won the Heisman. No explanation needed.