If you think casting directors are casting parts based on race over talent and/or potentially profit, you're missing the whole point of these enterprises.
Plenty of time, casting directors cased based on race
because it will generate more profit.
So, do you want them to cast parts with the idea of making less profit? This is where you guys lose me in this discussion.
JJ, this is where I think we keep having a misunderstanding. I'm not calling out any specific people. Not condemning any person or company or anything for trying to make money. All I'm saying is that it sucks and is unfortunate and should be fought against, when possible, that the system exists in a way that can be a disadvantage to minorities in the field.
Your argument is akin to the 60's and a business owner not wanting to allow blacks into their establishment. Can't condemn that person for looking out for themselves, but in doing so, they're perpetuating an environment that contributes to inequality.
We must be on two completely different pages.
My argument is not anything at all like a 60's business owner not wanting to allow blacks. If that is what you've got out of my posts......I'm dumbfounded and question your reading comprehension skills. What I'm saying is that I don't think black people are underrepresented in the motion picture industry. Nobody has provided any data, proof, statistics, or the like to show how they are in fact underrepresented. Pretend I'm from Missouri and show me.
You provided a bunch of anecdotal cases of where you felt a POC could've/should've been cast over a white person. Cherry picking anecdotes is not proof. You and others have posted that the Academy etc. are changing their ways to allow for more diversity. That's great but it does not prove that there is any real problem that requires addressing. It only means that they have heard the complaints from some special interests and they are adjusting to placate them. I will acknowledge that the way the Academy picks their members and the length of time they serve and have an impact on voting does contribute to a skewed white point of view. It is akin to an old white guys club and washing out the old timers, with some outdated attitudes, may take some time. But that condition still does not seem to have negatively impacted black representation outside of what the percentages indicate it should be.
I however have posted some percentages that would seem to indicate that blacks are winning academy awards commensurate with their population in this country and also in line with their attendance in movie theatres. I contend that it might not be a good business decision for Hollywood executives to start casting and catering to an audience that doesn't exist. I have noticed lots of black actors, in lots of roles, in lots of movies that I like. Will Smith- love about everything he is in. Denzel, Samuel Jackson, Laurence Fishborne, Morgan Freeman, Halle Berry, James Earl Jones, Jamie Foxx, Don Cheadle, Danny Glover, Forest Whitaker, Cuba Gooding Jr., Eddie Murphy, and I could go on. I like all those actors and they are good at what they do. But, for the most part, the movies they are in and the roles they play are not usually super conducive to receiving best actor awards. IMO they get plenty of top billed starring roles and are not suffering from any injustices or prejudices that I can see. I could be wrong. Maybe the industry is biased beyond all belief. Where is the proof? Where are the numbers and statistics, not anecdotes, that back it up?
Since 1995 African-Americans have won 12.5% of the acting Oscars...and make up 13% of the US population. They account for 10% of the MPAA viewing audience (2014). Should they be winning awards in percentages in excess of their population? Should Hollywood be catering to the 10% rather than the 56%? What exactly am I missing here? Change my mind. Show me the error of my ways. Or, I guess you and Moiraine and StPaulHusker can continue to call me backwards and ignorant without any proof to backup your claims and concerns.