Redman

Here is another example of his delusions...... Check out his self-description from his website.

Perhaps the most respected voice in the world of sports broadcasting, Jim Rome is the leading opinion-maker of his generation. As host of the nation’s premiere sports radio talk show, Rome is known for his aggressive, informed, rapid-fire dialogue

What an arrogant schmuck!

1. Husker fans need to wake up. You are no longer a legitimate Big 12 team.

 

 

2. However, Missouri is a better football team than Nebraska. Unlike Nebraska, Missouri has a QB, and is not a defense-only football team.

 

1. I your eyes, did this happen just over the last year? I remember Nebraska beating Mizzou 24-3 last year, with Brad Smith. So when did all of this happen? Does Oklahoma's down year relieve them of there status inthe BIG 12? Are they still legitamite? No matter what smack you may talk, Nebraska IS 3-0. Until Mizzou beats them or proves they are contenders for the title; it is just that smack.

2. Speculation, I move to swipe this statement from the record. If Mizzou stays within 20 points Texas ( yes it is a funny statement just thinking of it) I may take you seriously.

For those of you whom do not think the highest of Jim Rome, you have watch this video. It is great. Jim Rome gets an a%#-whoopin by Jim Everett. This a true example of how Jim Rome really is.

Jim Everett kickin Jim Rome's butt

... I also remember a questionable 03 game vs. Florida State that would have given the Huskers a 3peat.

you mean '93, rite?

Yep, my bad. Thanks for the correction.

The 95 Huskers would physically tear USC apart. If memory serves me right, the media in 95 was convinced that Wuerfel and Gators were an unstoppable offense. Nebraska made them look embarrassingly awful. Nobody even came close to remotely giving the Huskers a game. I also remember a questionable 03 game vs. Florida State that would have given the Huskers a 3peat. I honestly think that USC may lose one this year. I think if they play Texas, they will.

incidently any WR recruits that are worth a hill of beans, can expect to start next year for the Huskers.........let's hope by then Beck will be tossing the ball and maybe the O can light up the board.....i do think that might happen...next year

You are so right. This move makes me ask the question: Does BC have a lack of confidence in the WRs right now, if he has to take from the RBs? Why not give Leon Jackson some reps as well?

Any incoming WR that can use the bump and run effectively, run decent routes, and not drop the easy ball WILL start next year. Although, I do believe that Brooks will be starting within the next 3 games, and that the current starting receivers with improve drastically over the next couple of weeks.

Could be interesting. If it gets him more time on the field, why not. Although, if he has one bad play (maybe he trips and falls) he may be pulled out and not play there either.

6.) Don't get me wrong Isu may not be the worst team in the North but they are in the bottom half.....Did anyone see the Army game?......Meyer will thro 3 INT's and he will be sacked 7 times...He is a poor mans' Tommie Frazier...and when I say poor, I mean friggin broke...no Caesh....NO CAESH at all.....ISU looked very slow and their D-line wore down as the game wore on....Baylor would have beat them.....the only thing that saved them was that were playing Army instead of Navy cuz Navy would have used them

 

Huskers will Roll the Clones and move into the top25

ISU fans seem to disagree with you. Here is what they are rambling about on one of their message boards:

CycloneReport

You better find some corners before Saturday because I'm just guessing that Cotton still thinks your corners aren't very good. ISU will run some, but that will not be the game plan. If it is, it would be a huge mistake. Not because of the grayshirts, but because of ISU's lack of ability in that area.

Be prepared for four to five wides and Meyer in the shotgun. Your "great" linebackers will have to either cover or you will have to bring in some cover people.

I think Nebraska's secondary is in for one long day. Meyer is a hell of a lot better than Palko (i mean powlus-overated).

Let us compare Palko and Meyer:

Palko: 2004 season... 3,067 yards, 24 TDs and seven INTs...24 TD passes led the Big East and are the third-highest single-season total in Pitt history...season passing yardage is the most ever for a sophomore and third best overall at Pitt/ had four 300-yard passing games and one 400-yard passing game

Meyer: 2004 season ... 10 TD passes with only six interceptions ... his 1,926 passing yards is the 10th-best single-season passing total in ISU history, bettering Sage Rosenfels' 1,781-yard season in 1999 ... team's second-leading rusher, netting 331 yards on 144 carries and two TDs ...

Wharf Rat,  That was the very impression I received, as well, when I read Former Fan's thread.  It reminds me of the people who say they supprot the troops and then hope that the mission fails.  You can't have it both ways.  The current players are very positive, most of regents supported the contrat extention, a large majority of fans support him and obviously the Chancellor does, as well.

 

Pederson also is responsible for many other sports.  How is their success? Let's see, national bowling championship, probable volleyball national championship, probable return to the CWS, etc. plus a new athletic center and stadium expansion.  If this is all done within the budget, then we have a very successful athletic dept.

 

Tom was a Hall of Fame coach for his era.  He could not recruit and build another championship today unless he drastically changed. Today's kids are different, because the NFL is different.  How many Top 10 teams are running the option?

Iowa has built a 31-7 record the past 3 years.

And even they are once again struggling.

Would it be possible for Wallace Franklin and/or Broderick Hunter to join next year?

I know the first 3 games we had some injuries at WR and DBs (Bowman). Does anyone know the injury situation going into ISU?

14-7 Army....6:58 left in the 2nd

Luckily for NU, the clones always GIVE the game away in Lincoln. NU won't earn it, it'll be given to them.

 

Yep, the clones always give it away in Lincoln, like in 2003 they GAVE NU the 28-0 win. Oh, like in 2001, the gave NU the 48-14 win, and in

1999: NU 49 - ISU 14

1997: NU 77 - ISU 14

1995: NU 73 - ISU 14

1993: NU 49 - ISU 7

1991: NU 38 - ISU 13

(all games in Lincoln)

I could keep going but I think you get the point. The clones give nothing away. You can't get spanked so badley and call it giving it away. You clones have one good (well good for ISU) season and you start having delusions of grandeur. The series history is NU 81...ISU 16...and 2 ties, so once your win about 65 or so more games, than you could use the phrase "give it away in Lincoln" with sounding nutz.

You may say " that was then , this is now" , but you used the word "always", and you would be very wrong.

If our offense shows up and can score, we will win. I don't think ISU can score much against the blackshirts (hopefully the blackshirts score more than their offense).

Sidenote: Does anyone else think that McCarney looks like shreck

I am not quite sure how I feel about this. I do think it is an interesting idea, but not sure how the offense would take it. The coaches have all said that you win and lose as a team. I know that the blackshirts have stepped it up (similar to a couple of years ago), but I think the offensive players need our support right now more than ever. They do hear the criticism and though they may say that it does not bother them...it does.

Don't get me wrong, I have strong criticisms of what BC and JN are doing thus far, and I realize part of the blame must lie upon the players, but I think we should show them (players) our undying support. Especially with the way things are going.

Yes, this I am sure would be something done with the utmost sincerety, and not meant to criticize the offensive players, but I wonder if it would be worth the risk of damaging their confidence of the players even more if taken the wrong way.

f##king hillbillie!

 

 

HA HA HA

BOY, if he didn't have it in for NU before, he really will know. Personally, I think Musberger is a weasel, and would like to buy the cop a beer.

I think as long as Lucky and Glenn are eased into line up, seeing small amounts of playing time is good for them. It allows them to get used to the game atmosphere (on the field). It also places more responsiblity on them to learn the playbook, plus gives them the opportunity, though small, of showing how they can perform. Next year, without Cory Ross, we would have a buch of backs with virtually no playing time.

If our offense would get things going, they will probably see more playing time. I do wish Beck could play more. I would not redshirt him. I am not possitve that the future will be in Ganz's hands. Beck seems like the type (from what I have read and seen) that will respond to gameday pressure in a different way than he would respond to practice. The good ones always step up to the plate. I would like to see if he would. As long as he does not turn the ball over, I would think he could gain as many yards as the current offense is (handing it off to Ross).

I think Murtha should start over Thomas.

I agree. He is quicker and holds his blocks better.

I thought Taylor, for the most part, had plenty of time to throw vs Pitt. From what I saw, his receivers are not running good routes and are not getting open. I thought that our run game could open up the pass, but pitt only had to play single man coverage. If the offense can PREVENT the penalties vs. ISU, things should go a little better. Oops, I did I say PREVENT, the one thing I do not want to see against ISU.

It was good to see Murtha healthy. He had a good game. I almost thought he may become a Ryan Schuller and never really get fully healthy. Has Craig Roark seen any time? I haven't noticed.

Griz why are you so angry? Do you need to talk about your problems? Try 8 hours of sleep, drink lots of liquids, and no caffiene.

What would happen if taylor gets hurt? He is the only QB with playing time.

BC had some questionable call, but a lot happed that wasn't entirely within his control. 2 missed field goals, back to back sack because th QB doesn't scramble. I do think blame falls his way for the illegal formation and false start penalties (this is a preparation problem)

Amen. I say give it time. Frank was a great guy and I have a lot of respect for him, but he isn't coming back and I really don't want him to. I personally think it will be fun to watch this new team grow, and they will. Stay red.......