Jump to content


RedSavage

Members
  • Posts

    2,704
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RedSavage

  1. 28 minutes ago, Born N Bled Red said:

     

    Eh. I'd rather have us say.

     

    "Man kid, you're really damn good, we wish we could take you, but we only have room for one scholarship QB this year and I've been recruiting this other kid since he was in 7th grade, so we're going to take him. We wish you the absolute best in your career, and if things change don't be afraid to reach out, you never know what the future holds." 

     

    Than 

    "Well, we're kind of full, but here is a non-committable offer that's really just for show, or you know what, we could offer you a walk-on spot and you could earn a scholarship later, if it works out." 

     

    The first one respects his talent and his time, is open and honest. The last one feels like a used car salesman trying to talk you into buying a 1972 Pinto because he doesn't have what you really want on the lot. 

    And what about before whipple?

  2. 21 hours ago, Mavric said:

     

    If he turns out to be pretty good, I'm sure many will label it as a "miss", especially if Watson doesn't pan out.

     

    But I think that would be an unfair characterization (potentially).  It's simply a case of bad timing.  We brought in a guy who already had been recruiting another guy that he liked and would have to start from square one with Flores.  When recruiting QBs, you don't really have time to do that.  You grab the guy you want when you can get them.  You can't really afford to slow play one while you build a relationship with another and risk losing them both.  

     

    Had Whipple been here a year earlier, that's different.  But I don't think it's fair to call it a miss.  It's not like he really chose one guy over the other.  He chose a guy he had been recruiting for years over a guy he doesn't even know.

    It may not be Whipple's fault but to not even really contact an instate player with what could be some pretty good college talent, seems pretty inexcusable.  At least show SOME interest.

    • Plus1 1
  3. 55 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

    Yeah it’s a really good show. I just don’t know how accurate some of it is. I have trouble believing some of those people were actually as bad as portrayed. No way Bird was THAT big of a prick….or maybe he was :lol:

    Haha Agreed.  I know a good chunk of it is true but I also don’t know how much is embellished and such.  I think he actually might have been from what I’ve heard…

  4. 34 minutes ago, ECisGod said:

    I'd like him to be retired by the next time we start a coaching search which would mean Hoiberg turns it around next season and stays for a long time.

    This would be my preferred option but don't think it's likely

    • Plus1 1
  5. 33 minutes ago, Husker in WI said:

    I'm willing to wait and see - I don't know what they were being taught, but they were not being put in positions to succeed. IIRC he looked pretty solid as a freshman, and then looked worse each year. I think he'd probably be fine with better coaching - same with Piper, Corcoran, and Benhart. There's enough talent there.

    I think Piper, Corcoran and Benhart could be alright.  Especially Corcoran.  I'm not overly concerned about him. 

     

    Hixson does not have the physical tools to be a P5 player, IMO.

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...