Making Chimichangas
-
Posts
2,696 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Media Demo
Posts posted by Making Chimichangas
-
-
2 hours ago, HuskerNation1 said:
Please clarify then what white people you felt were mad that a black man was POTUS? White Democrats? Just trying to gauge where you were headed with that comment.
This is EXACTLY the kind of bull**** that is so prevalent on the internet.
Posters like @HuskerNation1 blithely and selectively "don't remember" the one million plus examples on social media where white conservatives called Obama the N word, referred to him as an ape, and/or dehumanized him.
-
1
-
-
49 minutes ago, HuskerNation1 said:
Our own government has stated no votes were changed in the 2016 election so that is wrong. And most importantly, if Russia was interfering months before the election, that was under Obamas watch....why dont you direct your venom at him? It was Obamas Justice Department still in charge all of 2016. Trump did not get sworn in until January 20, 2017.
Jesus...
The CIA, NSA, FBI, and every other alphabet soup organization within the US government concluded that Russia hacked our 2016 elections.
But Trump said he believes Putin and the KGB over his own intelligence and security service. #Treason
-
2
-
-
14 minutes ago, HuskerNation1 said:
Here are some educational points about gerrymandering and the US Presidential election process.
1. Gerrymandering is focused on how House districts are drawn and its not equivalent to how county lines are drawn in a state. I stated Trump won over 700 counties which does not align with gerrymandering.
2. Presidential candidates win electoral votes based upon who has more total votes in a state. It has nothing to do with how the district lines are drawn in that state.
I am going to respond to this when I can access this site on my laptop and have access to a larger screen. Instead of the one inch high, four inch across, window I normally have access to while typing a response on my phone.
-
4 minutes ago, HuskerNation1 said:
And some additional analysis on why Trump won including the fact that he won over 700 counties that Obama previously carried.
Ever heard of gerrymandering?
Crooked Republicon Gerrymandering
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, HuskerNation1 said:
Our own government has stated no votes were changed in the 2016 election so that is wrong. And most importantly, if Russia was interfering months before the election, that was under Obamas watch....why dont you direct your venom at him?
Classic "whataboutism".
Trump's crimes and criminality don't matter because _____ Democrat did x.
(And I know that whatever alleged crime any Democrat supposedly committed is 100% true because it was alledged on BOTH FauxNews and Brietbart!!!)
-
21 minutes ago, mrandyk said:
Trump focused on the issues down the stretch everyone. No attacks from him, nope.
My god you are just so far gone.
-
7 minutes ago, HuskerNation1 said:
There have been a variety of studies that believe Hillary spent too much time focused on Trumps personality and not enough time in delivering an optimistic message in the finals weeks of the election. Trump was talking about immigration, the SC, taxes, and fair trade. Those issues helped him turn a handful of blue rust belt states in his favor.
It was actually Russian hacking into our electronic voting machines and changing votes to Trump...
But since you're a Trump worshipper, I know facts/truth/reality mean nothing to you.
-
7 minutes ago, HuskerNation1 said:
I would say its politics as usual that both sides like to play. Just like the smear against Kavanugh recently. Its all about power, and with the Dems out of power they will do anything to get it back. But thank you for inferring you want to go along with the idea-less party that is focused solely on impeachment. Part of the reason Trump won in 2016 is that he focused on issues down the stretch while Hillary focused on trashing Trump. The left is out of ideas outside of Medicare for all. Meanwhile Trump and the GOP keep delievering for the American people.
The reason Trump won in 2016 was because:
1. Hillary Clinton was a garbage candidate with too much baggage from the start.
And
2. Trump appealed to the inherent racism, bigotry, anti-lbgtqia, anti-immigrant, and anti-brown/black/non-white fears that 70+% of white america has.
Irony: You calling me "too far gone."
-
6 minutes ago, ZRod said:
What's lost in this discussion, because Ric is so good at the Gish Gallop, is that it doesn't matter if Kavanaugh is innocent or guilty of a crime in his youth. He is wholly unfit to hold the highest bench in the land, as he is a paranoid, conspiracy driven, immature partisan fraud. It's sad that it took such accusations tobunciver the truth. His arguments wouldn't have held up in any court, and asking others to be held to a higher standard than he held himself to is a moral and ethical delima.
The bolded...what a concise description.
-
7 minutes ago, HuskerNation1 said:
Sorry to say what you said is not true at all. Also your comment about wanting to PUNCH a wall is why it appeared you were triggered and embodying the Angry Left.
So you're saying that if Trump was a Democrat, and was accused of:
*Sexual assault/rape
*Violating the Emolulents Clause of the Constitution
*Treason (for his words/actions in Helsinki)
*Accepting 30M dollars in illegal campaign contributions from Russia funneled through the NRA.
*His recently uncovered tax fraud.
you WOULDN'T be screaming for impeachment?
I don't know you at all, but I think you're lying.
-
1
-
-
Saw this on social media, and wow, how apt...
"The Brock Turners of America grow up to be the Brett Kavanaughs; who then let the Brock Turners get away with rape and every other violent crime because they don't want to "ruin" a rich, white male's future."
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, HuskerNation1 said:
Thanks for demonstrating what the angry left is all about. Perhaps I should just cut and paste this post into the other one you seem to be triggered by.
Spare me your lame boilerplate "triggered" response.
You know what I said is 100% spot on and true.
If Trump was a Democrat and had committed all the crimes he's accused of, you'd be hoarse from screaming for impeachment.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, HuskerNation1 said:
That would require renaming several Trump threads like:
1. Trump: Taking credit where none is due"
2. Dont just impeach Trump...annul his Presidency. Perhaps the dumbest ever thread
3. Why is this Pres in denial about this?
4. Trumps voter fraud panel
5. In age of Trump still consequences of being racist
6. A Man you can bait with a tweet
That is just the first 2 pages...
If you cannot distinguish between normal and "incindiary" rhetoric then congrats, you're part of the problem.
For example...
Normal Rhetoric: I want to cut taxes.
Incindiary Rhetoric: All Mexicans are rapists.
It makes me want to punch a wall at how blithe, self-serving, and utterly hypocritical Trump supporters are.
If Trump was a Democrat, with everything he is currently accused of, Repubicons (and FauxNews) would be screaming for impeachment. But since Trump is a Republicon, with all his crimes, nobody on the right gives a sh**.
Hypocrites.
-
1
-
-
On 10/11/2018 at 6:54 AM, HuskerNation1 said:
One thing that should concern all Americans is the growing anger from the Left that is promoting or resorting to violence since Trump was elected. I fully understand Trump used fiery rhetoric at rallies in 2016 and condemn those too, but the trend since Trumps election against Republicans is prevalent and downright scary.
1. June 14 2017-A Progressive maniac opens fire at a GOP baseball practice which could have killed all Republican members there had the Capitol Police not been present, including my local Congressman who is a family friend.
2. November 4, 2017-A neighbor who sympathizes with the left assaulted Rand Paul breaking his ribs among other injuries he suffered.
3. June 2018-Democrat Maxine Waters calls on Liberals to not allow Republicans to eat or sleep and stated "If you see anybody from the Cabinet in a restsurant, dept store, or gas station, get out and create a crowd and push back on them and tell them they are not welcome anymore, anywhere."
4. June 2018-Sarah Sanders told to leave restaurant where she and family were enjoying a meal.
5. July 2018-Cory Booker delivers speech encouraging crowd to "Get up in the face" of Congress officials they dont agree with.
6. Mitch McConell chased out of restaurant by angry left mob.
7. GOP House Candidate Rudy Peters attacked by man with switchblade by man screaming "Fu*k Trump."
8. Ted Cruz and wife chased out of restaurant by angry left mob.
9. October 2018-Hillary Clinton promotes the lack of civility on the Left and states that civility can start again onky if the Dems take control. In other words its ok for Progressives to continue to be uncivil if they are not in power.
10. October 2018-Former Obama Atty General states that, "when the opposition goes low, we kick them."
This is just a short list and does not include the over the top tactics we have seen from some comedians and members of Hollywood as well as in recent weeks in DC with the Kavanugh hearings. We have also seen Antifa and other left wing radical groups use their tactics to shut down free speech by Conservative voices like Ben Shapiro and others. I am fully supportive of peaceful protests in our nation but it appears that key voices in the left are pushing for intimidation and confrontation instead of peaceful protests. I am in full agreement with Rand Paul that somebody is going to get seriously injured or killed if this trend continues....and he is speaking from experience.
What a joke of a post and topic.
-
4 minutes ago, Moiraine said:
He might not be good enough.
Heresy!!!
-
16 minutes ago, Husker Richard said:
Wouldn't they still want him to play in 4 games this season? Northwestern would be a good game to get his feet wet at a position of need as they have shifted significantly to a passing offense with the retirement of Larkin.
That's kinda what I was thinking. I mean, you can play a player in four games, and still redshirt him, so why wouldn't you play a player in said four games?
-
7 minutes ago, LaunchCode said:
By what quarter, should we start an over/under.
I laughed so hard reading that board there is no way I'm NOT playing.
Depends on the individual's tolerance for alcohol. The average person would probably pass out by middle of the 3rd Q. I'd be at the end of the game, like Pam Poovey, calling everyone a bunch of lightweights.
-
1 hour ago, ColoradoHusk said:
The magic number is 3 years. If Frost’s teams aren’t showing significant improvement by year 3, the odds are against it ever happening under Frost.
Well year 3 is, in this case, completely irrelevant. Frost is here for 5 years at the absolute minimum. Otherwise we gotta pay him seemingly a hundred million dollars to buy out his contract.
-
I think if anyone actually tries this, they'll pass out--or die of alcohol poisoning.
-
4 hours ago, Landlord said:
idk if you represent "You [Iowa] folks" but you are bad with remembering what we're talking about.
The answer would be non-conference scheduling. Not how many P5 teams you play in a year.
Maybe you should have put "non-conference" in bolded font to help the little fella out.
-
This thread somehow exists in our and bizarro world. It is a thread here in our world, and yet somehow various posters are coming onto this site and trying to tell us after the fact that our previous sucky coaches weren't in fact sucky at all.
-
1
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, LaunchCode said:
Rebutting a purely subjective opinion is a waste of time no amount of facts presented are going to change.
What I initially stated was fact and not opinion, Banker's D shut down Wisconsin's offense with Oregon St type talent. So why do you think that wouldn't work here? Are you saying Oregon State had better talent?
You should do comedy because you're hilarious.
-
1
-
-
22 minutes ago, ICHawk24 said:
Iowa is locked into an annual game with ISU. Not the strongest annual opponent, but it is a rivalry game that brings out the best in ISU. Since it isn't for the national title, you guys will chortle at such a rivalry game, but I've already pointed out how college football fans now think that rivalry games are lame.
Iowa plays UNI in 2020, SDSU in 2022, and Illinois State in 2024. Nebraska plays South Alabama in 2019, SDSU in 2020, North Dakota AND FBS newbie Georgia Southern in 2022, and SDSU in 2024. Nebraska actually has one more FCS team scheduled than Iowa does.
Nebraska does have huge tilts with OU in 2021/2022, but otherwise is playing Colorado/Cincinnati. Colorado/Cincy isn't hugely different than ISU.
Nebraska does not appear to schedule an appreciably tougher non-conference slate than Iowa.
Don't you have a cave or underneath a bridge you have to get back to?
-
1
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, HAHACORNHUSKERSSUCK said:
Nope NW going to wipe the floor with you.
You do realize how lame your schtick is, right? I actually feel sorry for you.
Where We Speak Less-than-Fondly of Former Coaches
in Husker Football
Posted
Oh I understood your point.
I was just pointing out that even if Frost somehow goes 0-12, 2-10, and 1-11 in his first three years he'll get another two years minimum.*
* Of course the caveat being unless the big money boosters decide to pull the plug and buy out his contract earlier than five years.