wutthewut

I agree, but if the Dems can take control in 2018 they might not even need the Russian ammo (assuming he makes it that far). About that... http://www.dailywire.com/news/19079/story-may-end-putin-wanted-trump-win-myth-once-and-ben-shapiro Written by Ben Shapiro, who has been extremely critical of Trump through the entire election and his tenure up to this point.

Do you have an example of this in mind, or...? I just described our current healthcare law. That's what it's done. Tens of millions who had great healthcare had their premiums and deductibles become so unaffordable that they dropped out entirely. Hundreds of millions who had great/good healthcare had their premiums and deductibles shoot through the roof but they're suffering under it still. Is it okay for those 100+ million people to foot the bill for the 22-24 million that Lefties continue to fear-monger about? I'm just curious where leftists draw their moral lines.

It doesn't have to be one way or the other. That's what's lost in the fray of all this hyper-partisan horse$h!t. If I had it my way, government wouldn't be involved in healthcare other than to put very few necessary regulatory restraints on it - but as few as possible. But answer this question: Is it morally superior to take healthcare coverage away from millions, make insurance premiums 3-5 times more expensive and deductibles 5-10 times more expensive for millions of others, and tax the hell out of the rest in order to provide subsidies so that 22-24 million people with "pre-existing conditions" can have health coverage?

Thank you! Now can we all agree that political parties are a sham, politicians are the scum of the earth, and America is the most prosperous country in the history of the world because of individual liberties expressed through both social and economic platforms?

It was the right thing to do but another bill will come along. Maybe they'll actually talk to Democrats about it this time (like the Democrats did with the GOP when the ACA was passed) and give the voters more than 2 hours to look at it. Although I doubt it. Boy the GOP sure is a fraud of a party As opposed to the Democratic party which is...??? Remind me when the Dems gave 2 hours consideration for a bill that would take away healthcare from 22 million people. Perhaps you forgot.. "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan" "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" "We have to pass the bill to see what's in it" Give me a break...

A lot of UNL agriscience professors work solely on research that allows food to be grown in worsening conditions which are caused by global warming. And then you have this know-nothing dumbass say this bullsh#t. I think the anti-science stuff is what sickens me the most about the Trump presidency. Anti-Science? I didn't realize Trump sees gender as fluid, or that a beating heart inside a womb isn't a human...

It was the right thing to do but another bill will come along. Maybe they'll actually talk to Democrats about it this time (like the Democrats did with the GOP when the ACA was passed) and give the voters more than 2 hours to look at it. Although I doubt it. Boy the GOP sure is a fraud of a party As opposed to the Democratic party which is...???