45timesbetterthanemptysuit

Good choice to ignore the abuses of the Obama administration. You know, the things he actually did! As I posted with links!

Perhaps he can start by using the DOJ to secretly seize the AP’s phone records? no no intrusion into the 1st here! Certainly not the 4th or the 14th!

Obama prosecuted 9 cases vs. 3 by all previous combined ill have ave to check out the board search function later tonight! I bet there were 20-30 pages of blistering criticism regarding that assault on the 1st amendment!

Well I guess it might be a rebalance then. After all Obama did that.

Let’s wait until he threatens to arrest the press lest they give up their sources, taps the phones in the press room and hacks reporters computers first

http://deadline.com/2018/01/state-of-the-union-tv-ratings-donald-trump-barack-obama-1202274787/amp/?__twitter_impression=true heck President Donald Trump probably did have the record! It didn’t include streaming!

I find Trumps lies odd, curious and pointless. I find Obamas lies criminal, lethal and trying to force legislation. It may be whataboutism but I believe someone did not understand how anyone can accept his lies. I pointed out why I can. There are, of course, more examples that are, to me equally if not more heinous, but that should be another thread.

I have to go to bed, but you point out which claim you doubt, and I will support it with links or retract it within a couple of days if you wish. I am pretty certain i can find links to support everything, and surprised if you have not either heard of them or seen them. Vox is crap by the way. quote the salient point that explains why a FISA warrant that uses opposition research paid for by a political campaign would be included in a request without mentioning that it was paid for by the opposition. Honestly you don't need to, I am certain that it is illegal and unethical, and you are sure its not. Privileged communication with the President?

Are you speculating as to my character? Or is there something you would like to say. I guess I am not sure how your post addresses the topic as it seems to be directed at a poster?

What your saying makes little sense. Trumps speech was absolutely popular. That it was "less popular" and trying to equate that with it not being popular, is just odd. I really don't get what, or why you would bother to post it. I stated exactly the same thing in my OP, including the numbers for Obamas speech (high 90's as I recall) and pointed out that it was the least popular in 20 years. I also, clearly and specifically pointed out the intentionally misleading part, and didn't bother to speculate as to why CNN might write an article pointing that out anyway.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/documents-atf-used-fast-and-furious-to-make-the-case-for-gun-regulations/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/atf-68000-guns-in-mexico-traced-to-us/2012/04/26/gIQAtSz9kT_story.html?utm_term=.2e9ca8cd0255 This is somewhat pointless as nobody cares, and it is completely off topic!

Am I now? I guess having an opposing view is "stirring the pot"? what did you accuse me of earlier? Living in a fantasy world? I cant recall exactly, I do remember the unicorn pic though. It was very nice! did you draw it? I have argued my points.

Yeah, thats pretty much what a "leak" is. It doesnt matter that he wrote it, it didn't belong to him, and it was classified. Lets say I take a notebook, and write down everything I remember from my next classified briefing. I guess its fine, and not a leak, if I give that to a buddy and get it out to the public. Perhaps "cutout" would be a more accurate term. Its all semantics and indicative of a corrupt head of an institution.

Perhaps you can quote the post I made that was "without context" Maybe I can either provide context or explain the post!! As is, Im not sure what your point is? You provided links that stated what I said was true in my OP. No, it definitely seems that you are following me around! I find it charming!

is your contribution following me around? Sweet!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/25/trump-ordered-mueller-fired-then-backed-off-ny-times-reports.html http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/26/did-trump-try-to-fire-mueller-behind-scenes-presidents-dispute-with-his-legal-team.html They (fox) did cover the story. I guess its possible they featured a hamburger over it! Interesting thing about the Farrakan pic. I think somebody here posted something regarding an outrage about somebodies visitor to the SOTU. Now if the CBC and Obama did meet with Farrakan, that is much worse than inviting a hack to the SOTU. Is that pic real? That is pretty bad! (but I digress)

That is great! You actually provided examples of yellow journalism! I was sure someone would! Not that tough is it? I think one or 2 of those stories may have been essentially debunked, but if there was a credible source at the time, it would be news, and it is entirely possible that Fox did not cover it!

You could look at my first post. Very specific, easy to follow. It has an article that is making an obvious attempt to portray something as other than it is, while not actually lying. I even went so far as to be very specific regarding the numbers they chose, and where they were used in the article. Now I will look back and see your contributions.

Well I read the text messages. I saw the one with them talking in "Andys" office about committing treason. I saw that Comey stole classified FBI property and released it to his friend to leak. His Friend that is now his "attorney" You know, Attorney client privilege. I guess thats easier than getting married! I know that the FBI fought and fought about providing materials to the oversight committee, and I think, required a court order to do so! Yeah, I suspect i won't be surprised if President Trump was right, and he did get essentially "wire-tapped" by the FBI, and it would be the FISA court using Dem paid for oppo research to do so. That seems worse than when Lois(Oops lost my emails and the FBI granted blanket immunities to potential witnesses) Lerner weaponized the IRS for partisan gains!

After Obama, the silly things President Trump lies about are nothing. I mean when you get people killed to perpetrate a lie? We have just gotten past the most corrupt administration in US history, you expect people to care about how big the audience was for SOTU? It was awesome though seeing how many did watch! I had a lot of friends sending pledged and promising to "boycott" it! Damn that was funny!

Gosh, I really didn't think it was that confusing?

I won't bother to look back at your posts regarding Trumps "collusion" with the Russians! Hows that all working out in the Supreme Court?

Schiff go against the rules? The NYT "leaks" coincidentally occurred when that loon excused himself from chambers!

Lol I just caught this! Yeah, man Hawaii is really pulling in those immigrants! Gotta love an activist judicial system! Isn't that schmuck in Hawaii an Obama appointee?

A few individuals do not make an institution.