Jump to content


Decoy73

Members
  • Posts

    2,133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Decoy73

  1. 5 minutes ago, TGHusker said:

    Bielema has never been a guy I cared much for but you cannot argue with results - the game wt Ill will be interesting.  I wonder if he'd have an interest and if so WHY?

    Trying to get us to page 300

    :include

    Bielema at IL is interesting.   He’s clearly a good B1G coach and jumping to another conference school would be pretty unprecedented, but isn’t his ceiling somewhat limited in Champaign?

  2. 3 minutes ago, Nebhawk said:

    This is the question that I am sure many are asking yourselves right now:  How do we root for our team even if we think that Mickey might not be the best fit as a full time head coach?  Not saying I don't want him or saying that I do want him.  The thing is are we setting ourselves and the kids up for a big letdown if Mickey isn't retained and ends up winning 5 or 6 games?  Who would want to coach this team and do it having to retain Mickey or Busch?  Almost seems like a lose, lose situation to some points.  I hope for the kids sake they make a bowl game.  I hope that they get what they deserve in the long run.  Just asking a serious but not serious question. 

     

    I can only speak for myself.  
     

    There’s, fan me.  
     

    and, there’s 

     

    realistic, me. 
     

    They frequently disagree. 

  3. 7 minutes ago, Nebhawk said:

    If you think that Leipold is not a good enough recruiter, you are slapping our resources and money in the face.  He has recruited decent being in only his second season at KU and really his first season of having his recruits since he started late after recruiting was done already when hired.  The issue is going to be if Mickey wins two more games and he doesn't get the job.  No one will want this job if they have to retain the interim guy who the players like alot and have played hard for since Frosty was shown the door.  Basically Leipold can coach, if you win games that improves recruiting on its own.  I wouldn't sleep on him just yet.  But again, even he wouldn't want this gig if he has to retain the interim guy that wins 4 games.

     

    • Fire 1
  4. 3 minutes ago, FrantzHardySwag said:

    I really haven't entertained the mickey talk too much, because it seems unlikely, but say we go 6-6 or 7-5. That would mean Mickey went 5-3 or 6-2 in the B1G. All I hear in regards to the coaching search is, we need someone that can win in the B1G...wouldn't that vault him above a Lance Leipold or Matt Campbell who are going to 4-5 5-4, 6-3 type coaches in the big 12 this year?

    I would say so, but I just don’t see it happening.  With the teams remaining on the schedule, I’d be shocked if we won 2 more. Plus I think Trev will have someone by mid November. 

    • Fire 1
  5. I have about 2-3 coaches who I would really like to get for the Nebraska job.  Then when I listen to MJ and I equally like the fact that he's in the HC role now and I don't want that to end.  Like MJ says, it comes down to W & L.  Time will tell.

    • Fire 1
  6. 8 minutes ago, sho said:

    ASU would be a BAD choice for Scott.   If the rumors are true about excess drinking/partying being a factor in his lack of focus in Lincoln, it'll be 10x worse for him at ASU.

    Isn’t his wife from AZ?  Maybe there’s a reason for him to want to be down there. 

  7. I’d bet Wisconsin is looking at Aranda.  I would imagine his name is coming up with coaching searches more than Leonhard.  This firing now, points towards giving them a chance to appeal to “Coach X” before someone else (NU maybe) grabs him.  

  8. 7 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

    The frustrating thing is, he's looking right at 4 as he starts coming towards the line to blitz.  He then leaves him and tries to block 20 that he has no chance to get to.  Grant is in good position to block 20, but by the time he realizes 4 is coming through the line, it's too late to adjust.  This isn't physical talent.  It's a total mental breakdown of one player.  

    I partially agree.  He clearly doesn’t know his assignment and that he needs to stick to it.  But he does struggle on the edge, with the physical part too.  Would he be a better guard?

  9. 12 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

    This was easily the worst play of the game for us. Barnhart should have taken the inside guy and should have known Grant was there to pick up the outside. He was never going to get to the outside guy. 
     

     

    Instead of having a right tackle, we may be better off having a two back set with Rhamir as pass pro.  Only 50% kidding.  I hate to bag on the kid but on pass plays, 54 is a liability.  

  10. 21 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said:

    Just because Frost didn’t turn out to be a good coach, doesn’t mean that Mike Riley didn’t deserve to be fired when he was. 

    My point was “fans “ firing coaches.  Kind of like so the last shiny toy on the shelf doesn’t get bought by someone else. 

    • Plus1 1
    • Fire 1
  11. 4 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said:

    Sounds like Wisky fans didn’t want to risk losing Jim Leohnard to another school, so they did a pre-emotive firing of Chryst with the hopes that he succeeds in the interim and he can take the full time job. 

    Sorta like when NU fans fired Mike Reilly so we didn’t lose out on Frost going to another school.  That worked out well for us.  

    • Haha 4
×
×
  • Create New...