Jump to content


HS_Coach_C

Members
  • Posts

    1,884
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Posts posted by HS_Coach_C

  1. 4 minutes ago, chamrocck said:

    What the hell is going on?  College football is changing and getting to be a bit of a joke with all the player movement.  If we are going to lose some of our best players let's at least get some dudes to replace them.  

    But we're limited to 25 new scholarship players per year, including new high school signees, JUCOs, and transfers. Not going to be easy to keep a full roster, but at least we have plenty of walk ons to reward.

  2. 5 hours ago, lo country said:

    Rutledge has a great record in year 2 where ever he has been as an analyst.......I think he is a sacrificial cow....I was hoping for someone else...But that's just me. Maybe some changes/moves coming up. 

    Yes and no. I think he did some good things, but when your scheme allows for punters to frolic for first downs multiple times during the year, there might be some blame there as well.

    • Plus1 2
  3. 30 minutes ago, BIG ERN said:


    I'm not saying to stop recruiting them, but they can no longer be the focal point of the offense like we tried to run through Wandale. We aren't Ohio St and won't get those type of guys to compete where we want. Running a no huddle with average playmakers = very bad offense. 

    I agree with you for the most part.  I guess to me "death of the Duck-R position" sounds like you wouldn't use those type of players at all. 

     

    I'm all for more power running, bigger receivers, and shifty guys as the change of pace not as the focus.

  4. Eh. I wouldn't completely rule out a Duck-R type receiver. Wandale had a lot of success even if he wasn't used quite right. Lindsey was a Riley recruit. Jones, Woodyard, and Williams were not really Duck-R guys and were all quick gets to fill a class. Spielman had plenty of success here. Fleming flashed potential but supposedly had off field issues.

     

    I get it. We haven't had guys stick around, but I wouldn't stop recruiting a FEW of these guys. Just like you wouldn't want a toolbox full of the same tool, you don't want everyone on the team to have the same skill set. We need the big bodied guys and the smaller quick guys both.

    • Plus1 2
  5. 19 minutes ago, SECHusker said:

     

    Yes. It has taken far too long to develop any level of consistency, they still miss gaps, and they are a liability in the passing game. In comparison to the improvements made by the other units, the lag behind.

    Disagree.  They still missed some plays, but until Miller and then Reimer got hurt, this was arguably the best unit on a solid defense this year. You also had the #4 guy going back and forth with OLB because of depth there. The jump ILB made from last year was definitely the biggest of any position group. The athleticism is still a question, but I think that is improving as well.

    • Plus1 3
  6. Gotta finish out with 3 straight wins and disciplined play. Get guys excited, get some momentum, keep your recruits. Then at the end of the year it's 1 bad loss to Illinois, an expected loss to Ohio State, 2 shoulda-coulda-woulda losses to teams with excellent defenses.

     

    I don't think I'm as down on the team as most after today, but there can't be any letdowns the rest of the way.

    • Plus1 1
  7. 11 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said:

    Fleming isn’t suited up today, so this may have legs. 

    I wish we would coach these kids so they can contribute and have good relationships with the team rather than running them off because "they don't get it".

     

    Maybe there's more to it, but this stinks.

    • Thanks 2
×
×
  • Create New...