Archy1221

37 minutes ago, NebraskaHarry said:

Based on what Archy wants here he's obviously never had to go through the pain of experiencing an abortion with his partner or someone close to him.

  Well it’s obvious someone hasn’t read this thread.  Good Lord.  Sometimes it’s ok not to type the words you are thinking 

34 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

My dude….

There is a difference between 29% of Americans being okay with “in all cases” (in a place and time where late term abortions are basically nonexistent) and that same 29% being okay with, or in only your imagination, being eager to abort babies moments before natural birth. You just don’t want to acknowledge it because it leaves your strawman naked on a pole.

You are the only one here who is using a strawman when you incorporate “eager to abort babies”.  It ain’t me my dude.  
 

Probably almost all of them would not personally choose that option, and as you well know by reading the thread, INt point is that 29% believe that it should be shoukd be an option for anyone.   THAT IS WHAT THERE VOTE IN THE SURVEY OK’s.  That’s what I have a problem with.  

42 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

and literally nobody other than maybe an extreme few wackos were arguing for.

29% of Americans to be exact.   According to the survey 

38 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

You're responding about a survey

Yes, full stop.  It’s my view that people are sick when they believe abortion should be legal in all cases.  I believe there has to be some line in the sand.  You can bring in Trump, sheep, the tooth fairy, Santa, Ms. Strawman all you want as it means nothing to me.  

1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said:

5 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

 

And, prior to Dobbs, this was settled

How was it settled?  By what mechanism?  And I assume you mean by SCOTUS, which had no right to settle abortion back then and it was correctly overturned.  

Just now, BigRedBuster said:

Because it's very clear to everyone else that you have fallen for this fake issue that Trump and his sheep brewed up.

Dude, I’m responding to a survey that neither Trump nor a sheep posted on here.   A survey that says 29% of people are disgustingly fine with no limits on abortion.  Once again, this isn’t hard to know what’s that means.  Whether it happens to one baby, 10, 100, or 10,000 being aborted while healthy and viable while mother is healthy, 30 days or hell even 60 days prior to birth is a disgusting thought that it’s even an option. 

7 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

Yeah....it's pretty funny when this is a quote from the article.

 

•  

They aren’t legal yet 29% of Americans would be fine with them being legal.   That’s what was being discussed by me

17 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

Isn't it fun when Trump and his sheep make up controversy over things that literally don't happen, get their followers all lathered up, try to paint everyone else as unreasonable heathens....and it's all based on a falsehood from the start?

Not sure what Trump or sheep has to do with you not understanding what “legal in all cases means”.  But here we sit talking about Trump and sheep in order to deflect 

15 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

Holy logical fallacies Batman.

 

Strawman.

False Dilemma.

Hasty Generalization.

Slothful Induction.

 

Take your pick.

And we have another one Robin. 

4 hours ago, teachercd said:

HAHAHAHA!

 

I mean, if you are Joe, don't you just play that as your campaign commercial???  

You would kinda have to right?! 

1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said:

You're literally arguing about something that doesn't happen.

 

https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/abortions-later-in-pregnancy-in-a-post-dobbs-era/

So put it in law so it continues to not happen  really not so hard

11 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

No. To many people, it means this shouldn't be decided by a bunch of politicians that have no clue about individual situations making an absolute law that can greatly negatively affect someone's personal health and wellbeing.  

You literally have no idea what legal in all cases means 

4 hours ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

I'm guessing 99.99% of people would say that Ms. Strawdog should not be able to kill her healthy baby mere days before natural birth.

Actually 29% say Mrs. Strawdog should be able to   According to poll of course.  

4 hours ago, NebraskaHarry said:

Im no doctor

Correct.  
 

4 hours ago, NebraskaHarry said:

 

Im no doctor but common sense tells me if someone is actually considering "aborting" a healthy baby one day before expected natural birth, they're probably in labor and it's called giving birth at this point. 

Incorrect.   “Legal in all cases” means they can abort the child anytime before natural birth or induced birth in order to have the baby.   
 

Will thousands of people get cold feet 30 days before their due date and go for abortion?  Doubtful, but even having that as an option is quite insane.  As you know. 

5 hours ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

What if you are about to give birth to a strawman?

How is it humanly possible you don’t understand what “legal in ALL cases” means?  Put a line in the sand on what you’re not comfortable with.  

6 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

.  I would think that way fewer than 29% are perfectly comfortable and OK with a woman and Dr aborting a perfectly healthy child a week before birth just because.

Legal in all cases means just exactly that!   That they are fine with the situation you just presented. 

I think I missed the part of the video that showed the meltdown 

It’s pretty sick that 29% of Americans believe abortion should be legal in all cases.   Believing it’s ok on Aborting a viable baby a day before natural birth, a month before natural birth, etc. is pretty gross. 

2 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

It truly is amazing how stupid she is.  
 

 

She is extremely stupid and no different than the professional agitators.   She doesn’t want to govern, she just wants to protest and agitate for “her causes”. 
 

However, private university’s still receive federal funding.  Research grants, Pell grants, federal student loans, etc..

2 minutes ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

Eh, I'm alright.

 

Mocking what you vote for is always fun for me. 

Just checking on my guy.  

57 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

Deion is a bigger POS douchebag than I ever thought he was. When he got the CU job I didn’t like him on principle (because it was CU) but now I just hate him solely for who and what he is. f#&%in clown.

He definitely is not helping himself nor is his kid.  What a douche family.  Show a little leadership at some point. Be an adult 

9 minutes ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

If we can agree to use lower cap civil war -- partisan opposition intense enough to spur physical face-offs and violence for months or years -- I'd put it at a solid 22%.  That's a reasonable number based on my hunch that scenarios like J6 and the Gaza protests could be made broader and nastier with the right players stoking the fires. Not so hard to imagine.

I would agree with everything you just said yet wouldn’t call it a civil war.  I would also suggest that the left will go bats#!t crazy upon the off chance Trump actually wins and the new protests by the Left will be deadlier and more costly than the BLM summer of madness. 
 

4 minutes ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

No. Not at all. How do you pull that out the post? What's f#&%ing wrong with you?  

Oh ok.  Sorry.  Your carefully worded post makes it sound so.  

29 minutes ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

Why do you think I chose that example? 

 

Trying to make this easy for you, Arch.

Ahh 4D chess 

Are you trying to say we don’t REALLY need to worry about a coming civil war because we already are in one?   Geeee thanks Joe

1 hour ago, teachercd said:

No kidding.  

 

I can hardly clear my cookies.

Are you talking about throwing up when you eat too many cookies.  I thought we were talking computers.   

1 hour ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

the chances of a Civil War are 0% for a variety of reasons.

Yes and thank you.  

4 hours ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

And everyone on Earth agrees you've been wrong about the things we shouldn't worry about. The Archy move is to say it doesn't rise to the level of Gettysburg, so relax!

Well that just isn’t true.    Bringing up a possible coming Civil War is similar to the fear mongering people do when they call everyone they hate a Nazi.  It’s just not based on reality. 
 

4 hours ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

Can you imagine college kids closing campuses across the nation and getting armed responses?

Do you mean like campuses having to go to remote learning and cancelling graduations because of uprisings?   Well now that you mention it…..that seems to be happening now with good old Joe.