Archy1221

12 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

Which, he goes in detail in the tweet that there's no evidence that it's happening.

 

This is a fantasy created by Trump and you have fallen for it hook line and sinker.

Seems you are the only one who doesn’t believe ballot harvesting doesn’t happen.   Which is weird considering your very own source said it actually happened.  In his tweet you linked to 

20 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

So....this has been a huge topic ever since 2020.  How many of those thousands of people who would have had to have known this happened, have come forward with proof that it did?

Come forward so they can get prosecuted?  Yeah not so brilliant strategy. 

19 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

This would be 11,000 people involved with this.  And, even more because, they aren't going to be able to go door to door to 10,000 people without SOMEONE saying....this is BS, I'm calling the cops.

 

Sorry, you're fantasy of this being the huge Democrat conspiracy just doesn't hold water.

You mean the one your source admits actually happens

2 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

No.

 

But, the defendant had two options, I guess, in court.  First, understand that immediately, she admitted to the public that she stole it.

 

a) Keep claiming it's real and take the punishment for stealing it.

 

or

 

b) Admit it's fake and receive the backlash from MAGA....along with probably a huge lawsuit from the Biden family.

 

So...pick which way you want to go.  And...this verdict does not prove anything with it's validity.  

The DOJ is admitting it’s real by prosecuting her for stealing it. 

2 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

And, your solution is....without evidence that it's happening

Your own source that you literally posted said it happens.  

1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said:

So, this ballot harvester would need to know who received a mail in ballot for them to go get it from them.

Nope.  They just need to go door to door in traditionally light ballot reform neighborhoods.  Ask if they voted and if they “could use help” 

1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said:

2 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

He also explained to you how there's no evidence that it's happening on a large enough scale to make a difference

At the exact same time he said you wouldn’t be  able to catch it if it was!!  
 

I know you understand how close AZ was in 2020.  I know for sure that dude does.   1,000 people across the entire state each returning 10 ballots they harvested is 10,000 votes.  Yes it can make a difference.  He’ll check out lower CA 2018 where it became legal and R’s didn’t figure it out.  They got crushed.  

1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said:

 

So...you think there are people going around and getting 1,000s of ballots (that have not been filled out) from people who just hand them over to a stranger and nobody calls authorities that it's happening

Nope

7 minutes ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

24/7 cable monetized the news, and found it could profit off narratives and identity politics. And they could profit even more if they fired working reporters and replaced them with talking heads. Easiest way to keep the story going is to have good guys vs. bad guys, and pretty soon every story coming across the transom got broken down into those two bins.

I also find this to be unfortunate.  

16 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

Good. 
 

 

Does this mean the diary is real?  If so, this ain’t good for Creepy Joe. 

3 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

Good read. 
 

I would like someone who thinks ballot harvesting is happening and greatly affecting our elections….how do you think this works?

He told you how it works with his Criminal Carl paragraph.   He told you how it’s virtually impossible to catch and convict too.   
 

I’m to the point where ballot harvesting should just be declared legal in every state for every election and may the best ground game in collecting those signed ballots wins the election.  
 

It’s never gonna stop and only the biggest morons get caught doing it.  Let’s make it a level playing field for those that try and play by the rules.  
 

Except for maybe the Presidential election, most people don’t know s#!t about any of the candidates.  Campaigns should forget television ad spending and hire the best most smooth talking individuals and have them go door to door a week after ballots are mailed out and get folks to sign their ballots and turn them over after they were convinced by the smooth talkers to vote for the campaigns candidate.   Unfortunately this is where we are with elections.  

Lots of top rated HS QB’s bust out in college, however I truly believe Dylan is a special QB and will be program changing for NU.  

He has all the physical abilities to be great, the mental aspect to play the position and be great  by all accounts, and most importantly the mindset to get better than what he is.   
 

Hopefully Rhule and Company are able to stack talent around this kid and he stays healthy.  If so, it’s gonna be a fun 3-4 years.   

On 4/8/2024 at 6:19 PM, Crusader Husker said:

So there are stupid people on both sides....

Yes…..

I was the first in my family to wake up this morning!  Well if you don’t include my HS son.  
 

11 minutes ago, teachercd said:

How would killing the child tax credit help get voters?

 

 

That’s a good question and my spidey senses tell me the headline may not match what those Senators want to eventually pass.  But who knows.  Article was behind a paywall and I hadn’t heard that story before.  

Nice to see someone coming clean on reporting standards at NPR.  Important to note the Adam Schiff lies during Russiagate that were posted here too.  
 

https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust

16 minutes ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

Literally that they think they'll win in November and they can secure larger Business Tax Breaks and that they don't want to hand Biden a "victory" before the election. 

Thanks.  It’s behind a paywall and I never trust the synopsis of tweeters.   
 

I really don’t like it at all when political parties will not advance legislation because it’s an election year and passing a bill gives the other party a win.   It’s basically always an election year for the political class and try working for the people instead of getting re elected. 
 

39 minutes ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

Why would Joe Biden do this. 

What does the article say the reasoning is?  

19 minutes ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

The thing that makes me angry about these morons throwing the word genocide around is that it deeply devalues history and the important lessons to be learned from actual genocide in the past.

 

Genocide as a word losses it's meaning the more tik tok activist theater throws it around when civilians are killed in war. 

Absolutely.  Lots of these types of words are losing their meaning the past 10-15 years…..genocide, racist, fascism, socialism, nazi, socialist.   They get used to get views  and likes.   Both on the left and the right.  

Shocker! 
 

19 minutes ago, teachercd said:

Ahhhh, yes, the old "God told me to do it" bit!

 

Look lady, that doesn't work for dorks that try to blow up abortion clinics and it doesn't work for you.

 

God has better things to do with his time...like help students that have not studied pass their algebra test and help me to sink that 5 footer to save par.

The only time average golf Joe’s sink good putts is usually to save double bogey.   

Speaking of putts, Happy Masters Week! 

5 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

At one point, it was at 66.22.  So, at $10, that's an 85% drop.

I understand that, but again, that is the top value not the initial value.   The initial value of the company (not initial public offering) was probably close to what the initial investment was, maybe a bit more.   The value of the company looked like it steadily increased over the few years since formation 

39 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

Just wait.  It’s going well below $10.  But, my question is, why isn’t there already?  However, it would have to get below .50 for him to lose money. 

Just to correct the previous posters comment, at $10 the company wouldn’t have lost 90% of its initial value.  An IPO isn’t a company’s initial

value.  
All that said, I still wouldn’t invest in the company 

  Not much else I could say.

2 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

I have no idea how many shares he has.  But, I expect it to be well below $10 per share in the not so distant future.  

He reportable owns 60% of them

29 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

Only about 45% down from the peak when it opened.  I would still love to know who it was that thought it was a good investment back then.

 

 

I would never buy that stock.  It’s likely to fall even farther, probably much farther.   The question will be….does he gain more than his investment of what is reportedly $45 million when he is able to sell his stock?