Jump to content


Aliens05

Members
  • Posts

    103
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Aliens05

  1. 8 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

    Yes, that’s club level. It’s very nice.  We sat there for the northwestern game. 

    Thank you buster. 

     

    I'm taking a guy i take care of to the game who has a medical condition and I'm also wondering if it's too cold outside, can anyone in club level just go inside to watch on the TV's at any time? It looked like there were alot of couches and seating areas with TV's for people to watch indoors from what I could tell walking by.

  2. Hello, 

     

    I usually sit in the 600s level in east stadium. When you take the escalators down after the game you see 2 or 3 levels of BIG indoor areas with black leather couches, a ton of TVs, indoor restrooms and indoor concessions.

    Are these the club level lounges or are these the suites?

    I'm trying to surprise my father in law with a fun, new experience but I can't find anywhere online that shows or tells what the indoor club looks like as opposed to the suites

     

    Thank you. Gbr

  3. 25 minutes ago, BaytownHusker said:

    Man they still handing out blackshirts.  Lmao. What a joke!!

    I sometimes wonder if maybe part of that is that the staff is conflicted on how to handle player confidence/morale. They don't know weather to try to do something to give em some confidence or rip em a new one and risk taking a hit to their confidence..idk just a thought.

  4. 42 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said:

    I thought the coverage was way too soft against Minnesota and saw similar results against Purdue.  The lack of a pass rush is really killing the defense.

    I absolutely agree on the pass rush, it's been non existent for about 6 years now and i mean completely non existent..but even without taking that into play, why is there a wide open WR 15 yards downfield what seems like every play, at some point those guys have to be locked up. We had no pash rush against Michigan MSU or Oklahoma and didn't struggle to defend the pass.

    • Plus1 1
  5. Question, what the heck happened to our pass coverage? It hasn't been bad all year really until Minnesota and Purdue, Illinois I guess wasn't great, but we held Oklahoma, MSU and Michigan all day long in the passing game. We go from that to giving up 13 yards a pass almost every pass play it seems like. 

     

    Is it just that the defense has kind of given up intensity or is it scheme?

    • Haha 1
  6. 13 minutes ago, GSG said:

    ... create a thread. We don't need a new thread every time you're on the s#!tter for inane bulls#!t thoughts

    I mean if you don't think continuing to muff punts that lead to turnovers and getting safeties off punt returns in all 3 games we've played this season isn't an important discussion topic, I guess I'm not sure what is?

    • Thanks 2
  7. 8 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

     

     

     

    My brother sent me this today with the caption "What no mention of the record book for most fumbles"?

     

    In all seriousness I thought, you're right.. he's gotta be close to #1 most fumbles all time at Nebraska surely..

    • Plus1 1
  8. So I've thought about this before, but watching the Louisville Ole miss game tonight kind of brought it up again. 

     

    Ole miss ran some plays out of a T formation with two running backs, one to each side of the QB out of shotgun. 

     

    Do we not have this in our playbook? If we switch between Ervin and Stepp (even throw yant or Rahmir in there instead if you want) so much and they're all good enough to get playing time, why don't we run more out of a 2 back system? 

     

    Our running plays are so slow and predictable. Wouldn't a two back system make it at least a little trickier to defend if we're gonna run predictable running plays? They at least then have to account for one extra person who may get the ball.

     

    We could even throw some option rollout into the mix similar to what we ran against Fordham with toure. Especially since both backs are supposedly good at catching the ball, we could run not only running plays but passing plays out of this too. I think it would be a harder offense to defend, and we have the guys to do it. So why don't we run it? Anyone know? Is this not in frosts playbook at all, does he not trust our guys to do it?

     

    • Plus1 2
  9. 20 hours ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

    This isn’t true and it looks bush league every time a Husker fan whines it.

    Call it whatever you like, doesn't change the fact.

    20 hours ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

    This isn’t true and it looks bush league every time a Husker fan whines it.

    Call it whatever you like, doesn't change the fact.

  10. 26 minutes ago, Enhance said:

    That's the biggest monster on Nebraska football's back. When adversity hits, there's very little confidence that they can recover and make plays when they need to.

     

    To a player, I genuinely think Nebraska has the raw potential and talent to be a top 25 team. Consistency just continues to evade them, and it can often be just a handful of plays in a game that can mean the difference between losing by two scores or winning by two scores. They too often find themselves on the wrong side of those key moments... like last week when instead of getting a turnover, they get a roughing the passer call followed up by unsportsmanlike conduct. Good teams either bounce back from those mistakes or don't make them in the first place.

     

    I couldn't agree more with the bolded..but I want to add that in all honesty, 99% of other teams also don't get those flags thrown to begin with. I watched  all of the college football games Thursday Friday and as many as I could today and I saw at least 8-10 plays exactly like ours or worse, NONE were called. I agree good teams don't make those mistakes, but sometimes those mistakes are just good plays if you are any team not named Nebraska...for us they're penalties.

    • Plus1 1
  11. 4 minutes ago, lo country said:

    I saw PJ running down with that Ibrahim long run on 4th and 1.  That's enthusiasm.  It's contagious.  I have yet to really see any emotion from Frost.  He is pretty even keel.  Not a bad thing.  I often wonder is he coaching how he wants (demeanor/persona) or how he feels he needs to?  I'd prefer a much more "personable" style on the side lines.  Maybe he is.  Watching on tv they don't show that side or they just don't show much.  

    Id even say a majority of the time its less than even keel. Over half the time I see him in front of the camera he looks absolutely pissed to be there, and like he hated everyone around him with a passion. He looks severely depressed and angry. Now I can understand why he'd feel that way with how we play the game, but as the coach you can't come off that way to everyone, especially your players.

    • Plus1 1
    • Fire 1
×
×
  • Create New...