Jump to content


Micheal

Members
  • Posts

    3,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Micheal

  1. 55 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

    This team has a much better chance than any of Fred's other teams.  But, I feel like I have bipolar disorder with this team.  They can look so good and then so bad.  Who knows what team is going to show up....especially with any road games.

    Yeah it worries me. They are currently 13-4 and I feel in 5 more games they could be 13-9 or 18-4 which is scary. 

     

    Need to get way more consistent game to game. 

  2. 3 hours ago, Stumpy1 said:

    Cavazos wasn’t doing his job and was making decisions on his own. He was telling recruits we weren’t interested in them without talking to the coaches first.  

     Hmmmm not sure what to think of that. Surely not? That would be a very dumb decision on his part. 

  3. 2 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

     

    What a load of BS.  For some reason, the NCAA has it out for FSU this year.

     

    So, the transfer player went on a visit where this happened, then didn't transfer, stayed with his current team then went to the NCAA and told them everything that happened on the visit?  Give me a break.  I'd be interested in knowing where the transfer is from.

    Yeah I'm very interested in this! 

  4. 24 minutes ago, runningblind said:

    Iowa claims 5 Nattys too. We only claim modern era titles, not ones during ancient years where there were 4 or 5 different entities naming winners.

    That is insane Iowa claims 5 titles. 

     

    1921 7-0 (Big Ten had them turn down playing 8-0 Cal in the Rose Bowl)

    1922 7-0 (Big Ten didn't allow them to play again in the Rose Bowl)

    1956 9-1 (they were ranked 3rd in final AP and Coaches polls)

    1958 8-1-1 (ranked 2nd in final AP and coaches polls)

    1960 8-1 (ranked 2nd in final Coaches and 3rd in AP)

     

    I would mayyyyyyyyyyyybe give them 1922 as Cal tied 0-0 against the  Washington & Jefferson Presidents in the Rose Bowl.

     

    • Plus1 2
  5. On 12/23/2023 at 10:29 AM, Bball1091 said:

    I haven’t read the filing either, but I would think they wouldn’t argue that the entire contract is invalid. Rather, specifically the exit fee, within the contract, is/was unreasonable and a restraint against trade. Don’t believe they expect to be successful but rather filed the lawsuit in hopes of being able to settle with the ACC on a reduced amount. Many lawsuits are about posturing and end up settling.

    My thought would be when you add more parties to an agreement, if not all the members approve the addition, it shouldn't go forward?

     

    SMU, Cal and Stanford shouldn't have been allowed to join the conference unless it was unanimously approved. Since they were I would consider the Grant of Rights agreement, invalid at this point? 

     

    The status quo has changed. 

     

    YARN | Cooperation only lasts as long as the status quo is unchanged. | National  Treasure (2004) | Video clips by quotes | 20c5b9ca | 紗

    • Plus1 1
    • Haha 1
  6. I am a UNK alumni and my program (not theater) was cut. Pretty disappointing but I got my degree.

     

    I just wish the legislature could have given the university system more money to prevent it. The legislature was asked by the university system for a 3% budget increase and the legislature gave them the 2.5% increase. Hence the cuts. 

     

    I know UNL athletics have given to the university system before but no way was it going to be able to take care of a $58,000,000 shortfall. 

     

     

    • Plus1 1
  7. 13 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

    I also still wonder when NIL or whomever pays players is going to start demanding that if we pay you, you will play in games including bowl games. Hey, if you want the money….then play and don’t bail on your team.  

    When do the contracts start. When do we start trading players school to school? 

  8. 8 hours ago, Danimal said:

    Since Satt isn't going anywhere can we at-least go back to the plan of having a designated qb coach and Satt coaching TE's. If Peetz still isn't available then go find somebody else. Back at Temple Rhule changed Satt's position responsibility from qb's to rb's for a reason. 

    Yeah there has to QB coach after what we have experienced this year! 

    • Plus1 1
  9. 6 minutes ago, Nebhawk said:

    This program and its staff do not deserve a bowl bid based on academic reasons.  The professors and instructors should get that praise.  Tired of everyone and everything bending backwards for this "football program" to get rewarded for being awful.  Stop.  Based on football knowledge and the eye test, why would you invite Nebraska to any kind of bowl game?  Other than Nebraska fans, who would spend 3 hours watching this on TV?  I would rather take a 5-7 team that can score points and at least have an interesting game.  I would not tune in a bowl game to watch this sh!t show.

    I don't care about deserving it. I just want more practices.

    • Plus1 1
    • TBH 3
×
×
  • Create New...