Jump to content


UNL938830

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

UNL938830's Achievements

Recruit

Recruit (1/21)

0

Reputation

  1. I suspect that by the time this is all said and done in July or August, the victim's name will have changed to Christensen. Until then I'm outta here.
  2. Christensen’s case pushed back By The Associated Press Tuesday, Mar 11, 2008 - 03:04:57 pm CDT Nebraska football player Andy Christensen remains in jail after the judge in his case recused herself and his attorney withdrew. Christensen had been scheduled for arraignment Tuesday after being arrested on suspicion of first-degree sexual assault. Now he’ll go to court Thursday. Judge Mary Doyle recused herself without giving a reason in court. Defense attorney Brad Roth said outside the courtroom that Doyle is acquainted with the alleged victim. Roth also withdrew from the case, but he declined say why publicly. Robert Creager is Christensen’s new attorney. The alleged victim's mom being a judge has no effect on the case? Ask the kid that gets to spend two more days in jail.
  3. I'm not here to argue with you huskertrucker, I'm just going on what I have read in the paper, and the police report that was shown on the news, and there is nothing in it about over powering her. If there was something about over powering I would not think it was fishy that he could have fondled or inserted. I'm just going off what can be read, and what can be read is one side of the story.
  4. If he did what she said he did, throw the book at him. But to me quite a few things are fishy, and possibly will come out when Andy has his day in court. Fishy: 1. How do you have time to fondle and insert before she jumps away. (Panties or no panties) 2. How do they prove insertion? (unless there is DNA, and then it goes directly to my first sentence) 3. Why is the bond set at such an outragous number? (is it because her mom is a Judge?) 4. Why wasn't he charged yesterday? (not enough evidence yet? they know they don't have enough evidence?, waiting for more evidence?) 5. It still bugs me that you can call the cops at 12:32 am, and arrest someone at 1:00 am on charges this serous without investigating. I'm sure most of you will attack me for this, but something doesn't seem right to me. Like I said if he did what she said he did, he's in a world of trouble and should be.
  5. Google "$500,000" bond. All you get are murderers. What is going on here? Maybe the alleged victim is the daughter of a Judge???? Who knows?
  6. I don't know what he did, or did not do. But I do know most of you have him convicted already. I did some checking. The police call came in at 12:32 A.M. The police arrested him as he came out of the bar. (I don't know if it has changed, but 15 years ago the bars started turning the lights on and telling you last call 20 minutes before close=1:00 A.M.) I also remember that you had to be out of the bar at least by about 1:05 A.M. So lets say he exits at 1:10 A.M. That is 38 minutes after the call came in. That means there was no time for her to go down and get examined by police. That also means that as he came out of the the bar and was thrown on the ground and arrested, the police did all of this because someone called and said he sexually assaulted them. WITH NO INVESTIGATION. I don't know about you, but that scares the crap out of me. Hey, if he really did assault her, he deserves what he gets, but I think its to soon to lay judgement.
×
×
  • Create New...