Jump to content


suh_fan93

Members
  • Posts

    19,263
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    56

Posts posted by suh_fan93

  1. Just now, JJ Husker said:

    What is funny and sad is seeing someone so accepting of a team getting caught cheating and then justifying it with ridiculous arguments like; Nebraska is having a down year so they shouldn’t care or other teams are doing it (with no actual proof of that) or totally fabricated claims that “those” people think it’s only Michigan.  Your arguments are weak sauce.

     

    Yet you continually stalk and respond to my 'arguments that are weak sauce'.

     

    You were saying about weak sauce?

     

    Hmmmmmdeeeerp

  2. 6 minutes ago, ZRod said:

    Purdy has 107 pass attempts in his career. HH has 152. More or less a 2 game difference. The sample size is close enough. HH has a 7:6 TD/INT, Purdy is 1:1.

     

    The comparison is fine and fair.

     

    Even a 1 game difference can make all the difference.  Again small sample size.  It probably doesn't matter anyway who's playing back there this year.  I still don't see the harm in seeing what or how he might respond if HH or Sims are still fumbling and bumbling.

     

    Also thanks for the 'Warning' Mavric!!!

     

    LUUUUULZ

  3. Just now, ZRod said:

    Purdy has played enough to show that he's not a better option. He's a career 50% passes with over 100 attempts. He looked lost and was quick to run when he has seen action at NU, and he's not as strong of a runner as Haarberg. So what's the up shot there?

     

    Small sample size.  Purdy has played 'some' but if you compare how Sims and HH have started off it's a wash.

  4. 3 minutes ago, Saunders said:

    He's not good, so essentially yes.

     

    I say throw him in there.  I mean that's basically what Rhule and Satterfield are doing now.  Give him a series.  Who knows.

     

    I don't think he'd make much of a positive difference either honestly but at the same time it's not actually that absurd of a thought.

    • Haha 2
  5. 5 minutes ago, RedDenver said:

    Are you arguing that there should be no enforcement of the rules since there is cheating going on? Even when someone gets caught cheating?

     

     

    It's just funny watching Husker fans going ape $# over the whole UM thing.  You can definitely tell it's another down year for Nebraska.

     

    Kinda sad when you think about it...

  6. 3 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said:

    Chubba Purdy is still #3 on the depth chart. That means he’s getting zero reps with the #1 offense, and limited reps with the #2 offense. Anyone expecting Chubba to make a miraculous jump and be the savior at QB is living in a fantasy world. 

     

    Lulz

     

    At this rate I'd try 3rd, 4th or 5th string QB it's that bad. 

     

    Way better than Kool-Aid world I know that for sure...

  7. Didn't see the match.  Dang Nebraska NET wouldn't let me access due to not living in NE I'm assuming.  Once again it looks like they were able to deliver after NW had tied it 2-2.  Thought we would sweep this one again but happy to see them dig deep and not let NW sneak into Lincoln and get a win.

  8. 12 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

    I’ll say this one time. When you post on a public message board and say something that seems way out of whack, expect that somebody may question you on it.

     

    You said “I just think it's funny that people think UM is the only team doing anything that could even be remotely considered 'against the rules'.”

     

    It’s not about agreeing or disagreeing. You’ve either seen this from people somewhere, thus my question, or it’s a contrived strawman. Pretty legitimate to be asked about it imo. But feel free to scroll by and ignore.

     

    JJ. I don't owe you an explanation now or at anytime so I suggest you get the F over it.   Ser take a damn lap.  Every little thing in the book triggers you. 

     

    Guess what.  That's definitely not my problem.

     

     

    The end.

    • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...