suh_fan93

If we're being honest wow is Purdue bad this year.

11 minutes ago, DevoHusker said:

 

I'm just saying that while it definitely is a lot of registrations, it appears legal, and unless someone shows that it was majority D voters removed, I have no problem with it. It is cleaner when you don't have 26k+ inactive voters on the rolls. Shenanigans could ensue later.

 

I will give you credit, because that shady business could come from either side. You wouldn't want that right?

Except this doesn't involve 'both sides' now does it.  This was done 6 days before an election initiated by a Republican no less.  It's a good thing they have a clean record when it comes to gerrymandering, election interference and outright fraud right?

I mean if you don't call that shady then...  

5 minutes ago, DevoHusker said:

So, were 13,334 Democrats?

If so, I will agree with you. 

I'm sure their self reporting of their own numbers will be accurate.  I mean it's Republicans we're talking about here so you know you can bet your bottom dollar that they'll be honest....

Huskers going against the wind in the 2nd half.

It's not good when someone at home can look at Haarberg's eyes at the los and immediately know it's going to be a pass.

Gotta love the Purdue player celebrating the fumble recovery while the ball was still live...  

Had no idea that Purdue's defense is ranked dead last in the Big 10 for points allowed.

This is your chance Nebraska.

Who?

This is one ugly game so far.  

The fact that (I think?!??) you are trying to defend the purging by a Republican of 26,666 voter registrations 6 DAYS before their election is not surprising in the least...

Purdue will be down a starter and a 2nd is questionable up front.

2 hours ago, DevoHusker said:

 

From the post:

 

 

Bruh.  We all know what they're trying to do...  6 count em' 6 days BEFORE the election......