CHOPSKER Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 If so please review those last moments and give your objective thoughts... Quote Link to comment
Zaimejs Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 The ball hit the ground before time expired. Quote Link to comment
Zaimejs Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 And... from the rulebook: ARTICLE 5. a. The number of players participating by either team during a live ball. b. Clock adjustment when a ruling is reviewed. c Correcting the number of a down. 1. This includes the result of a penalty enforcement that includes an automatic first down or loss of down. 2. The correction may be made at any time within that series of downs or before the ball is legally put in play following that series. d. Any person who is not a player interfering with live-ball action occurring in the field of play (Rules 9-1-5 and 9-2-3-c). Limitations on Reviewable Plays ARTICLE 6. No other plays or officiating decisions are reviewable. However, the replay official may correct egregious errors, including those involving the game clock, whether or not a play is reviewable. This excludes fouls that are not specifically reviewable (Reviewable fouls: Rules 12-3-2-c and d and 12-3-5-a and 12-3-4-B). Quote Link to comment
shyndy Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 so, it comes down to whether or not that was in the replay official's mind an "egregious" error? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.