h8 the horns Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 Personally I think he deserves to be a top 10 guy. We are talking about a future first rounder and yet they have him listed at # 46. WTF? Here is the link from rivals http://collegefootball.rivals.com/photofeature.asp?fid=33125 Quote Link to comment
huskrplaya Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 'Top' doesn’t necessarily mean the most pro potential or even the most talent. It’s what the player has accomplished and how we think the player will do this season. But production does trump potential. Quote Link to comment
deedsker15 Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 'Top' doesn’t necessarily mean the most pro potential or even the most talent. It’s what the player has accomplished and how we think the player will do this season. But production does trump potential. but if you ask me this guy produced very well last year...as in he already produced like a nations corner...now he is back again for more I noticed that rivals got something right. Robert Griffin III is 85, just ahead of Blaine Gabbert at 93. Quote Link to comment
huzkerbob Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 These lists are always so subjective there's really not much point in arguing them. Seriously, how much stock should be put into a list that has Matt Barkley with his 15 TDs to 14 INTs nearly 25 spots ahead of Blaine Gabbert, who went 23/7? Based on their own criteria this countdown is already a joke. Quote Link to comment
GMoose Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 These lists are always so subjective there's really not much point in arguing them. Seriously, how much stock should be put into a list that has Matt Barkley with his 15 TDs to 14 INTs nearly 25 spots ahead of Blaine Gabbert, who went 23/7? Based on their own criteria this countdown is already a joke. Beat me to it. Did you also notice that they had Matt Barkley one ahead of Marvin Austin?! When I saw that it the list lost its luster to me. Quote Link to comment
huzkerbob Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 These lists are always so subjective there's really not much point in arguing them. Seriously, how much stock should be put into a list that has Matt Barkley with his 15 TDs to 14 INTs nearly 25 spots ahead of Blaine Gabbert, who went 23/7? Based on their own criteria this countdown is already a joke. Beat me to it. Did you also notice that they had Matt Barkley one ahead of Marvin Austin?! When I saw that it the list lost its luster to me. I was surprised that they already had 4 Tar Heels on their list, and none of them where Charles Brown or Quan Sturdivant. How many UNC players are going to be on this list? I know that D is talented and all, but they aren't THAT damn talented! Quote Link to comment
GMoose Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 These lists are always so subjective there's really not much point in arguing them. Seriously, how much stock should be put into a list that has Matt Barkley with his 15 TDs to 14 INTs nearly 25 spots ahead of Blaine Gabbert, who went 23/7? Based on their own criteria this countdown is already a joke. Beat me to it. Did you also notice that they had Matt Barkley one ahead of Marvin Austin?! When I saw that it the list lost its luster to me. I was surprised that they already had 4 Tar Heels on their list, and none of them where Charles Brown or Quan Sturdivant. How many UNC players are going to be on this list? I know that D is talented and all, but they aren't THAT damn talented! There will probably be 6 when its done. And North Carolina's D could have like 5 all-americans this year...that defense is THAT talented. How they got so stacked is beyond me Quote Link to comment
deedsker15 Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 These lists are always so subjective there's really not much point in arguing them. Seriously, how much stock should be put into a list that has Matt Barkley with his 15 TDs to 14 INTs nearly 25 spots ahead of Blaine Gabbert, who went 23/7? Based on their own criteria this countdown is already a joke. Beat me to it. Did you also notice that they had Matt Barkley one ahead of Marvin Austin?! When I saw that it the list lost its luster to me. I was surprised that they already had 4 Tar Heels on their list, and none of them where Charles Brown or Quan Sturdivant. How many UNC players are going to be on this list? I know that D is talented and all, but they aren't THAT damn talented! There will probably be 6 when its done. And North Carolina's D could have like 5 all-americans this year...that defense is THAT talented. How they got so stacked is beyond me my friend has told me that a guy named John Blake has had a lot to do with it...you may remember him from nebraska. John Blake In addition to his abilities as a defensive line coach, Blake is considered by many observers as the nation's top recruiter. In each of the past three years, at least one recruiting publication has named Blake the nation's best recruiter. Most recently, three Sporting News recruiting analysts named him the best in 2009. He also earned the same distinction from CSTV's Tom Lemming in 2008 and the Wall Street Journal and American Football Quarterly in 2007. Quote Link to comment
HuskerfaninOkieland Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 There will probably be 6 when its done. And North Carolina's D could have like 5 all-americans this year...that defense is THAT talented. How they got so stacked is beyond me Beats me but the NCAA is curious as well NCAA investigators probe UNC football Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.