AngryHusker88 Posted November 12, 2010 Share Posted November 12, 2010 (edited) California has a tendency to play Oregon tough, at least in recent history. In 2007, they were the only team to beat Oregon when Dennis Dixon was healthy & they beat them again in 2008. This year the game is in Berkeley & Cal is undefeated at home so far. College football is an unpredictable beast as it is. So for this scenario lets say Cal pulls the upset. As for Auburn, suppose their QB is ruled ineligible (I've heard that he could possibly be held out of the Georgia game, but who the &^%$ knows). So lets say they drop their next two games without their QB. Also for the sake of this scenario lets say LSU loses to Arkansas who has a recent history of playing LSU tough, has a pretty good football team this year & homefield advantage with an outside shot at a BCS bowl if they win out. That would leave TCU #1 & Boise State #2. My question is would the voters allow these two teams to play for all the marbles, or would a Boise State vs TCU championship be seen as undesirable & would the voters try to find a way to rig the polls so that a 1 loss team jumps Boise State/TCU (whichever is sitting at #2). Remember in this scenario the SEC champion has 2+ losses. Edited November 12, 2010 by AngryHusker88 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.