jrggvlynr Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 The phrase that keeps coming up is "Callahan needs his players for this offense". For just a second, forget about the offense. Our defensive gameplan and schemes are terrible. Callahan is definitely not acting like he learned anything from the NFL. Super Bowls are won with defense, special teams, and a running game. Patriots, Ravens, Bucs(which Callahan should remember) all play great defense. Its only in the college game that you can score 70 points a week and win with no defense. Our biggest problem is not our underwhelming offense. We scored 31, 24, 24 and 15 point in our losses. That's enough points to win at least 2 or 3 of those games. We eliminate the dumb penalties, catch a few balls and get a few first downs, we get into a rythym and move the ball. I love the concept of the WCO. Its really just an extension of the triple option/wishbone that dominated in the 70's. When run well, it is tough to defense. It does take time to establish as a system, and needs specific players. This is no different than our "old" offense. It also requires good play calling and evaluation of the defense. It also doesn't hurt to have a smart and talented QB. Callahan is more of a Mike Martz then a Bill Bellicheck. Possibly a good coordinator, not a great head coach. I think it was Bellicheck that said that a head coach is only as good as his assistants. The head coach should be more of a CEO and recognize the weaknesses in the staff. Some changes on the defensive staff could really make a difference. Success breads confidence. Winning a few games with good defensive play could give the team that confidence and a little swagger back. Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Both sides of the ball need to step it up big time. Coaches, players, the WHOLE TEAM. Quote Link to comment
jrggvlynr Posted November 7, 2005 Author Share Posted November 7, 2005 Agreed, but we can't expect the team to just start dominating both sides of the ball. We something to build on, or at least something consistent to fall back on. That needs to be sound defensive play. Coz thinks he knows how to scheme, he has no clue. Last years TT game and this years Mizzou game where perfect examples of his "schemes". Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 but last year we held MU to 3 points? that scheme obviously worked then...... Quote Link to comment
jrggvlynr Posted November 7, 2005 Author Share Posted November 7, 2005 Mizzou runs a completely different offense this year... last year Pinkel was trying to establish Brad Smith as more of a drop back passer. This year, they are running an Urban Meyer type Run-Gun option offense. Again, Coz tryes to outsmart what is an unconventional offense, and we get pounded for 523 yards and Brad Smith breaks the all-purpose yards record at Mizzou. I believe KU held him to 33 yards??? Could our defense have been able to contain Smith with KU's gameplan, or are our players just that bad? Quote Link to comment
clone Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 DEFENSE Wins Games!! What does the WCO have to do with the defense going to sleep! Quote Link to comment
jrggvlynr Posted November 7, 2005 Author Share Posted November 7, 2005 Nothing, that's the point of the post. The offensive regression is troubling, but not as troubling as the defense. I think the saying is "Offense wins games, Defense wins Championships" Quote Link to comment
clone Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I think the saying is"Offense wins games, Defense wins Championships" Yessir, that's how the saying goes......... but not my opinion. Quote Link to comment
bigredhusker427 Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I guess the Blackshirts decided after the Baylor game that they had done all they needed to this season and were going to just stop giving 100 percent. I think Cosgrove is to blame ultimately. Quote Link to comment
Blackshirt34 Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 We need a O line much more desperately than any position on D. OL play has been appalling at best. BC needs to address this situation this offseason. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.