bournehusker Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 I think we should try to relax a bit...myself included. 2008 recruiting was abyssmal. Those r the seniors we have now. We just need to allow for youth to develop and recruit better. I've seen an upswing in recruiting Quote Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 I think we should try to relax a bit...myself included. 2008 recruiting was abyssmal. Those r the seniors we have now. We just need to allow for youth to develop and recruit better. I've seen an upswing in recruiting well obviously you aren't a true Husker! Cause your above statement while articulate, sensible, and very accurate, it isn't a statement that would incite rioting! So take your common sense and well thought out statements to some other fluff filled message board! This here is HuskerBoard my friend. Come here with guns a blazin or STFU!!! Quote Link to comment
Fuzzy Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Per Rivals. Here is how Nebraska's recruiting class has fared under Bo Pelini. 2008 - Ranked #30 taking in 28 recruits (Colorado ranked #15) 2009 - Ranked #28 taking in 20 recruits (UCLA ranked #14) 2010 - Ranked #22 taking in 21 recruits (UCLA ranked #8) 2011 - Ranked #15 taking in 19 recruits (we took in 11 four star recruits) 2012 - Ranked #25 taking in 17 recruits (UCLA ranked #13) As of right now we are ranked #28 with 14 recruits. One amazing figure that i did see. Wisconsin has won the Big Ten title twice now. Yet from 2008 until now, they have never had a recruiting class that ranked better than 30th in the nation. Definitely makes you think, its not how high the talent you bring in is ranked, but what you do with that talent. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.