Jump to content


Ameer on the front page of Wikipedia


Recommended Posts



Wikipedia seems to always have terrible photos of living people

Why the hell is that? So much quality info and few quality pictures.

Like Tree Planter said, copyrights. People being protective of their image and not understanding the nature of wikipedia or photographers just being photographers. Heck the FBI even threatened to sue wiki for including its seal on the bureau's page. Stupid.

 

One would think that his photo from the university's official website, huskers.com, could be used as it's a public entity and such works are often open - for example works of the Federal Government enter the public domain upon their creation (so you can print as many copies of the 9/11 commission report as you want and sell them) but works of state governments are left to the states to release and it looks like they've copyrighted it.

 

Ameer could just take a photo of himself, email it to someone, grant open license and have them upload it.

Link to comment

Wikipedia seems to always have terrible photos of living people

Why the hell is that? So much quality info and few quality pictures.

Like Tree Planter said, copyrights. People being protective of their image and not understanding the nature of wikipedia or photographers just being photographers. Heck the FBI even threatened to sue wiki for including its seal on the bureau's page. Stupid.

 

One would think that his photo from the university's official website, huskers.com, could be used as it's a public entity and such works are often open - for example works of the Federal Government enter the public domain upon their creation (so you can print as many copies of the 9/11 commission report as you want and sell them) but works of state governments are left to the states to release and it looks like they've copyrighted it.

 

Ameer could just take a photo of himself, email it to someone, grant open license and have them upload it.

 

Someone could also take a picture of him and upload it with an open copyright license.

Link to comment

Wikipedia seems to always have terrible photos of living people

Why the hell is that? So much quality info and few quality pictures.

Like Tree Planter said, copyrights. People being protective of their image and not understanding the nature of wikipedia or photographers just being photographers. Heck the FBI even threatened to sue wiki for including its seal on the bureau's page. Stupid.

 

One would think that his photo from the university's official website, huskers.com, could be used as it's a public entity and such works are often open - for example works of the Federal Government enter the public domain upon their creation (so you can print as many copies of the 9/11 commission report as you want and sell them) but works of state governments are left to the states to release and it looks like they've copyrighted it.

 

Ameer could just take a photo of himself, email it to someone, grant open license and have them upload it.

 

Someone could also take a picture of him and upload it with an open copyright license.

Does it matter where they take it? Can I go to a CFB game take a picture and own it for all uses? NFL?

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...