NebraskaHarry

3 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

People knew this would happen when the pause in repayment originally happened.  
 

Citizen takes out student loan……

 

Gov says we will pause your payments (if you want) but interest will still accrue ……

 

Citizen says cool, I agree to those terms……

 

Gov says ok pause is over, here is what you owe…….

 

Citizen says WTH, this is unfair for me to pay back what to agreed pay back.    You all are used car salesman for making me do what I said I was gonna do…..

I can't find anywhere the government said interest would still accrue when loan repayments were on pause. Care to share?

9 minutes ago, commando said:

remember that loan we forgave you?    now you owe back interest on that.    that will go over well with the young voters affected by that.  guess the dems  can thank MAGA for pushing more voters to the left

Biden's going to veto the thing anyway. It's entirely tied up in the Supreme courts decision. Which I don't see getting through either. How many years of interest is that going back to? 36 months? Lucky I only have like $10,000 left on my loans but i'm not worried about myself. For others if you have $50,000 plus that's going to suck. In today's climate, it just will. Republicans are nothing more than shady car salesmen. Bleed low income people from money as much as they can.

3 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

That’s kinda how it works.   And that’s kinda how it was set up.  

Kinda?

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

You mean have them pay the loan they took out.  

Plus interest.

"We're losing the game." The game is not over.

We lost the game." The game is over. 

Those are different.

4 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Red apples to Fuji apples 

relevant

provide proof they are unreliable and that their testimony is false.   Otherwise, we were told many times in 2018/2019 to give credence to whistleblower testimony.  

Red apples to Apple electronics at best.

Still irrelevant.

Provide proof they are reliable and that their testimony is true.

If you say so.

7 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Did you speak up about who funded E. Jean’s lawsuit?  Did it really matter in that case?  No.  Does it really matter in this case?  No.   Unless you are accusing the witnesses of lying at the behest of Kash Patel.  Are you?   

Not exactly apples to apples.

Irrelevant.

Yes.

The witnesses here prove they are unreliable.

2 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

What Democrats turned Russia into was ridiculously embarrassing yet you have never had a problem with it and actually leaned into it. 

I Must have hit a nerve 

Well, yes actually. 

5 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Like the three year faux Russia investigation that we now know should never have even been started.   The same investigation that had British intelligence agency’s laughing at the “evidence” or I should say lack of,  fbi supposedly had.   We talking about that also.   Nah, that one you seem to like and are ok with. 

The only one constantly ranting about the Russia investigation appears to be you. 

1 minute ago, Archy1221 said:

Correcting your wrong post again is nerve wracking? 

 

Marcia was always a bit stuck up. 

9 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Almost, but……..welp here’s the post.   bolded for your reading pleasure.  This is getting habit forming for you. 
 

 

Violence of this kind does need to stop.  I wonder in Mr. Cooper will be looking back into his twitter timeline and figuring out he will wash the blood off his hands.  

Another nerve hit.

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

I literally said the kind of violence with the baseball bat needs to stop.   All political violence needs to stop.  It was said in my first reply post.  Wonder why you are upset about that?   Doesn’t fit your narrative me thinks

You should make up your own mind on if you like that feller or not?   

It's almost like you're making up $%^& as you go.

37 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

You struck a nerve. ^

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

Someone who complains about trafficking in divisive and “dog whistle” language while in the past talking in divisive and “dog whistle” language is sort of the problem he complains about.  
 

Yes, I agree.  That is interesting.   And telling. 

Do you follow this Jon Cooper feller

on Twitter or something? I do not so I'm curious what he's said in the past and if I should like him or not. 

1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said:

#wrongsideofhistory

 

 

Is Ron one of Russias political investments too? Similar to Trump, I could see why Ron doesn't want his bank (Russia) to run dry.

6 minutes ago, suh_fan93 said:

That DeDerpis guy.  What a leader.Florida has itself.  

 

 

 

Imagine if Biden did this? My God the conspiracies.

9 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

What are all these white supremacists doing protesting the “dirty brown” illegal immigrants as someone here refers to them.  
 

 

Why is the WAPO writing trolling articles

I must have your attention. Really struck a cord I guess. 

4 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

All those right wing rage farmers at the WAPO I guess. 

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/us-sees-record-migration-influx-as-pandemic-border-restrictions-lift/ar-AA1b40eO

Still trolling. You do you I guess.

30 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Correct.  If you are in a tizzy because I left out the word legal, then tough break I guess.  
 

Not sure what you’re trying to get at, but others here use ports of entry as a legal port of entry.  

Now you're just trolling. Got it.

On 5/9/2023 at 10:27 AM, Archy1221 said:

On 5/9/2023 at 10:06 AM, funhusker said:

Looks like we want to continue arguing about a stupid wall.

 

Okay, I'll give you a shot.  Explain it to me like I'm a 6th grader.  How would a wall stop a wave of immigrants coming through a port of entry?

It doesn’t stop people coming through ports of entry nor is it designed to do so.  It’s actually designed to funnel illegals INTO legal ports of entry so the US can process the applications vs people just walking over and we never know who they are or process them legally

"It 'wall' doesn't stop people coming through ports of entry nor is it designed to."

"It's actually designed to funnel illegals INTO legal ports of entry".

So a wall is designed to funnel people into legal ports of entry but it doesn't stop people coming through ports of entry, nor is it designed to? If people are going through other ports of entry even with a wall, how again are they being funneled INTO legal ports of entry even with a wall?

3 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

We, prior to you chiming in, were talking about finishing finding a wall and funding immigration upgrades at ports of entry and judicial components to it.  
 

If it doesn’t help solve the problem, why is there any fencing or walls at all at any point in the past?  

Show me.

6 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Of course you don’t. Just like most every other let everyone in all day long person, if it doesn’t affect you, you don’t care.   This doesn’t shock me.   A wall does you no harm, border communities say it helps and government wastes ten times that amount of the total cost of the wall on fraud and abuse in a yearly basis.   
 

since you think ports of entry of going peachy, you probably wouldn’t need to worry about the other 1% either then!!

Didn't say I wanted to let everyone in. Didn't say ports of entry are going peachy. We're talking about a wall. It doesn't solve the real problem. 

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

Immigration processing?  No it doesn’t, and no one has said it does or implied it does or talked about it doing (except you on the last one).  
 

You might be the only one here, however, that thinks the immigration intake is going peachy atm.   

I don't give a $%^& about the 99% of immigrants who want a better life and take jobs no one else wants. I give a $%^& about the <1% bringing the bad stuff. And a wall isn't stopping that. 

2 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

I said a wall was designed to funnel illegal immigrants/border crossers to ports of entry vs crossing wherever they please.  
 

Walls can’t process immigrants.  All these Republican mayors……errrrr democrat mayors freaking out over nothing I guess 

So a wall doesn't fix the issue. Got it. 

2 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

Yep it’s just Republicans freaking out I guess……or not.   More far right rage farming ehh @RedDenver   When did Lori switch parties btw? 
 

https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/mayor/press_room/press_releases/2023/may/DeclarationEmergencyResponseInfluxNewArrivals.html

You said the wall was for funneling and processing immigrants.