huskerfan2000

Yep, at no time in mans history has man evolved from any other animal.

Animals without society or culture influence, completely normal, bang members of the same sex all the time. What's their explanation? Ok....I've been around the livestock industry all my life. I even spent 3 years in college as an animal science major.I have spent many hours in nature hunting and watching nature. I have never seen two male animals banging each other. I can send you video of my dog at the dog park. He gets busy with any intact male.I'm pretty sure he didn't learn it from me. Please tell me you understand what is really going on? I don't know, but he sure gets excited when we pull into an interstate rest stop. A dog doing that is showing dominance, even a female dog will do that.

First of all I didn't make a claim that I only deal in facts or only believe in cold hard facts. Second of all... not accepting evolutionary theory with the mountain ranges of data and evidence in 2016 takes a really special, dedicated kind of ignorance. Also what the hell does "they have tried to link man" mean? lol, where did I say evolution doesn't happen? We were talking about man, that man has not evolved, they have tried linking man to evolution and have failed. Even Darwin himself doubted his own theory. https://x-evolutionist.com/charles-darwin-described-the-problems-with-his-theory-in-his-book-origin-of-species/

lol, the gulability of some people from the wiki link lol, yeah that is why it was never observed.

Animals without society or culture influence, completely normal, bang members of the same sex all the time. What's their explanation? Ok....I've been around the livestock industry all my life. I even spent 3 years in college as an animal science major.I have spent many hours in nature hunting and watching nature. I have never seen two male animals banging each other. I can send you video of my dog at the dog park. He gets busy with any intact male. I'm pretty sure he didn't learn it from me. Please tell me you understand what is really going on?

Animals without society or culture influence, completely normal, bang members of the same sex all the time. What's their explanation? Are you suggesting that humans should give in to any impulses or behavior tendancies they have, simply because it occurs in nature? lol no, of course not. I'm suggesting that the argument of "the gays are unnatural because evolution has given us a biological drive to procreate" isn't a rational argument. who says we evolved? There is no evidence of that evolution. You claim to only deal in facts, or only believe something if it has hard cold facts.. well, there are is scientific evidence that humans evolved. They have tried to link man, but it continues to fail and be proven false.

What is normal? The act of procreation is normal, it is how we are built. To say man and man or women and women is normal is ignoring the pure nature by how man continues on this earth. Without this kind of normal, man ceases to exist. Can the brain misfire, thus causing normal to change for that person? Well, so far that hasn't been discovered/proven to be true.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/08/27/controversy-erupts-after-nfl-quarterback-converts-to-islam-and-refuses-to-stand-for-national-anthem/

didn't figure you could.

despite your silly games, here is my response to your question. Of course I don't know what they got in turn, that is just a stupid question, and just because I don't know what all they gained doesn't mean it isn't true. That is also stupid to even suggest. We know for a fact Soros, as well as others, have donated large sums of money to Hillary's foundation.. Take note of that, I didn't say to her campaign. We also have emails of some of those donors requesting and getting special time with hillary because of those donations. To then suggest they didn't gain something else is as about as head in the sand as it comes. You won't get the smoking gun you are requesting, they are not that stupid, but that also doesn't mean it isn't happening, we have evidence to prove special favors are happening. Something tells me you will continue to dodge my question but it is still out there, waiting.

This was the question that was asked. The answer "She was bought and paid for" is not specific. I want to know who bought her and what they got in return. Names, instances, dates, etc. You can't answer it because you don't know, and you don't know because there's no evidence of anything. Go ahead, admit you don't know specifics, you just know the hysterics. You may have asked it, but I still asked a question first, which you continue to dodge..

Still waiting for an answer here. Still waiting for an answer. me too. I said she was bought and paid for, you said she is no different, so then I asked which others. You ignored that and proceeded to shift topics.. THEN claim you asked first, which you didn't. Hell, just go to the top of this page, you will see.

Totally prepared to back it up 2000 - unlike you throwing bs out there that has no source, or no credible source all I'm trying to do is land on a reputable exit polling that measures race votes that we both agree to. Neither of us would be smart to wager on something not knowing the source as a baseline. In his "poll" it states 1-2% and in the real world you can find any range of numbers you want. 1-2% can be equal to 11% in another poll. In the end you get another pis$ing match on here because we never started on the right foot talking about apples to apples. bnilhome can handle himself and I don't need your bullying. So you can dish it out but can't take it in return? Didn't you tell bnilhome he was out of touch, because of his views? Also, who decides what is credible and what isn't.. You?

Other than the fact that he has money and influence, what don't you like about Soros?If you don't like the Koch brothers.....you shouldn't like Soros. I'd argue it's a similar setup to our current election. Some might tolerate one over the other, but generally I'd agree with you. Other than the fact that he has money and influence, what don't you like about Soros? Plenty of info about that parasite on the web. I'm not asking the internet. I'm asking you. and I just told you.. You didn't, but I'm moving on. Yes, I did.. I said he was a parasite. Again... http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/ Now, consider what he does to make money. Does that explain things better? Don't worry. I'll just assume BRB speaks for you from now on. Not sure I understand that comment. What I said and what BRB said are not the same. Can you explain this comment?

Other than the fact that he has money and influence, what don't you like about Soros?If you don't like the Koch brothers.....you shouldn't like Soros. I'd argue it's a similar setup to our current election. Some might tolerate one over the other, but generally I'd agree with you. Other than the fact that he has money and influence, what don't you like about Soros? Plenty of info about that parasite on the web. I'm not asking the internet. I'm asking you. and I just told you.. You didn't, but I'm moving on. Yes, I did.. I said he was a parasite. Again... http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/ Now, consider what he does to make money. Does that explain things better?

Other than the fact that he has money and influence, what don't you like about Soros?If you don't like the Koch brothers.....you shouldn't like Soros. I'd argue it's a similar setup to our current election. Some might tolerate one over the other, but generally I'd agree with you. Other than the fact that he has money and influence, what don't you like about Soros? Plenty of info about that parasite on the web. I'm not asking the internet. I'm asking you. and I just told you.. You didn't, but I'm moving on. Yes, I did.. I said he was a parasite.

She was caught selling herself for money to the highest bidder via her foundation. How many other past politicians have done the same... Not how many have taken money, that is totally different. not one person is pimping Trump, at least I never have, nor will I ever. I disagree, I believe Hillary is way worse, but that still won't get me to vote for Trump. To whom did she sell herself, specifically? What, specifically, did the person to whom she allegedly sold herself, gain? Ah yes, dodge my question... Stop and think about what you are asking.. holy hell, does it have to be spelled out for you what those people will gain? Man!

These emails show what happens when you give special treatment to those big donors.. They start to tell you how to handle things. Like I said, she is a puppet. http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/JW-v-State-Huma-emails-production-10-unpublished-00684.pdf how to spur this, how to handle that...

She was caught selling herself for money to the highest bidder via her foundation. How many other past politicians have done the same... Not how many have taken money, that is totally different. not one person is pimping Trump, at least I never have, nor will I ever. I disagree, I believe Hillary is way worse, but that still won't get me to vote for Trump.

Other than the fact that he has money and influence, what don't you like about Soros? Plenty of info about that parasite on the web. I'm not asking the internet. I'm asking you. and I just told you..

You do not have to choose between the two. Sad, that is how you feel.

from the link.. This one is classic.. missed a national security meeting and had a personal email server that had numerous classified emails on it.

Sure, but so is a person willing to sell the White House for any amount of money.. That person can without a doubt destroy this country just a fast with even worse repercussions. Fine....don't vote for either. It's a worthless exercise we are going through trying to figure out which pathetic candidate is worse. Actually, it is not a worthless exercise at all... unless you don't view the country and it's future as being important Really???? They are both pathetic just pathetic for different reasons. It's like arguing if cow sh#t or hog sh#t smells worse. Who cares....their both piles of sh#t. I didn't say that because one is better, I said that because some still view Hillary as a good option!

does it bother you that you are being shown how incompetent she really is?

Other than the fact that he has money and influence, what don't you like about Soros? Plenty of info about that parasite on the web.