Archy1221

Is that our current President agreeing with someone who is questioning the legitimacy of a duly elected President?    Hmmmm

4 hours ago, Lorewarn said:

 

Okay.

 

 

 

 

I'll just go in order of all pass plays in this video:

 

 

1. Nowhere to step up to. Nothing bad here.

2. Tries stepping up, blitzer comes through, correctly escapes. Nothing bad here.

3. Went the only way he could.

4. Good

5. Good

6. Good (bad throw)

7. Good (bad throw) -- there hasn't been a single play yet where stepping up into the pocket is even an option for him

8. Great pocket, no need to step up 

9. Tries stepping up but it's honestly a mistake as pocket collapses, only escape was out the sides - ends up fumbling  

10. Moves around well but holds on too long. It's an end of half hail mary so not too damning any way

11. This is actually amazing pocket presence

12. This is good presence too, but literally nowhere to go and nothing to do. Gets sacked.

13. Amazing pocket presence - turns into a 70 something yard touchdown.

14. Steps up in the pocket well

15. No need to move around much, stands strong and delivers a beautiful strike

16. Same as 15

17. This play couldn't have been more well executed as far as pocket presence. Perfect job.

18. Feels the pressure coming well and slides over well. This isa ctually fun to watch seeing how good he can feel the pocket, honestly no idea what you're talking about.

19. Could have stepped up more, but he got the pass off and completed it. Not amazing, definitely not bad.

20. Feels the blitz and gets rid of it quickly for a completion.

21. Quick throw

22. Another amazing job of feeling the pressure and dancing in the right way to scramble for a first down.

23. Same as 22, except this time for a 30 yard scramble gain.

24. Quick throw, no pocket

25. Successfully escapes out the only route open to him.

26. Designed rollout

27. Falls back a little (not really anywhere to go), delivers a strike

28. Steps up into the pocket

29. Here's the first example int he video of him very poorly falling backwards instead of stepping up

30. Is able to stand strong for a long time, line eventually gives and he definitely had room to avoid and keep working but gets hit as he throws.

Adrian had poor drop back footwork which did not create enough depth for him to ever step up into the pocket.  Not sure if he was coached this or not but it was a big problem. 

1 hour ago, funhusker said:

So is your concern based on the fact that officers affected by 1/6/21 were recognized, or that the officers of Summer of 2020 were not?

The latter if we are going to do the first.   And I wouldn’t classify it as a concern more so thinking it’s political theater by the Dem in charge 

1 hour ago, Lorewarn said:

m pretty sure this is a common occurrence at the Capitol and across the nation.

If this is a common occurrence then will probably be able to quickly link to remembering for all those officers injured protecting near the Capitol in the summer of 2020? 

1 hour ago, Lorewarn said:

 

I'm pretty sure this is a common occurrence at the Capitol and across the nation. Memorial Day and Veteran's Day are holidays, for example. 

 

 

 

 

You bring this on yourself. Create a culture of taking everything posted exactly literally, and you'll be a victim of the same culture. Remember the whole, "just to be clear, gerrymandering doesn't impact anyone's right to vote" thing you harped on when we all knew what NM meant? 

I don’t but thanks for playing   Someone being wrong about a process and someone posting a typo aren’t really the same.  Sorry you don’t understand this.  

1 hour ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

I know: a fact based book written by somebody with a PhD accurately predicting that white voters care more about culture wars than their own economic interests 15 years before it went mainstream is certainly something a person like yourself (A denier that climate change is caused by human activity) probably would reject. 

Lots of people have PhD’s who don’t know s#!t about rural Kansas or reason people like living the way they do and the way of life in small towns.  Certainly a PhD from Mission Hills (I will assume you don’t know why this is important) who hasn’t spent time out there fits that description. 

44 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said:

I actually thought that you meant "I DIDN'T think about those people" in your original post.  That's why I followed up.  Thank you for showing me that you are a normal person, and it was just an oversight.

Thank you for thinking rationally about my post instead of jumping to the worst conclusion like many others here do.  

This is really great to see.  Hope it continues this way.  

7 minutes ago, commando said:

i didn't see that 1.     might have to try a search to find it.   but i know that every republican ad i saw rarely if ever talked about policies and always mentioned either the radical left or the socialist agenda.

That’s my biggest issue with political ads in general.  Neither side talks much about what they are for and instead talks shut on their opponent or the other party in general.  
 

i would love to have a rule implemented that says a political add could only discuss what the candidate is FOR doing and is excluded from mentioning another party or candidate/side etc to help eliminate all the negative adds.   

10 minutes ago, Scarlet said:

" I don't think about those people"

 

Vs.

 

" I didn't think about those people"

 

Two completely different meanings.  One is an oversight.  The other?  Well we all know what that meant.  

 

It could also mean the list is being typed on IPhone in an online forum and spell check got in its way.  As you could clearly see from enough of my other spell check issues @Guy Chamberlincaught one yesterday and had a funny post about it, I don’t reread every word to make sure it’s correct.   
 

Or you could do what you always try to do.   Insert yourself to try and dunk on someone, which never seems to work out to well.  

13 minutes ago, Scarlet said:

o were you slurring your speech when you wrote " I don't think about those people"?   

What?!?!  

I was telling the poster that I didn’t initially think about the suicides after.  I was initially thinking about who died in the actual riot.   Then he brought up the suicides after the riot from those who bravely served and I agreed.   
 

what is your actual problem?  Me agreeing with a poster?  Sorry that inconvenienced you.   

11 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

LOL. such a staunch party follower.  

Ah yes, calling someone in the same party as me a wacko and comparing them to wackos in the opposite party (who actually do hold leadership positions) is staunchly following them 

10 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

 

Is she trying to say he was “alt right” for the past twenty years?  
 

I was not able to obtain Warnagiris’s senior essay; a spokesperson for St. John’s said that the essays are not available online, and only those that win college prizes are stored at the school — and Warnagiris’s did not win a prize. But its title was listed in the school’s 2002 commencement pamphlet, and it comes straight out of ancient Greece: “Reason at all Cost: The Defining Human Quality in Epictetus’ Discourses.”

I don’t know what Warnagiris wrote about Epictetus, or whether the philosopher has continued to impact his thinking, but in the years since Warnagiris graduated from college, Epictetus, a relatively obscure Stoic philosopher who lived 2,000 years ago, has become a surprise rock star in the strange world of the alt-right.

1 hour ago, NM11046 said:

Wow.  To be clear, this was a memorial to show respect to the police and armed services who fought and sacrificed their lives on that day or in the days after protecting our capital.

I’m not sure who rest of your rant was geared toward but I will ask why this doesn’t take place yearly for every officer and soldier who dies whether it be by combat, natural causes or suicide? It would seem to be a great remembrance for those who fought and sacrificed their lives every day.  

Wonder if we will see Granny being pushed off a cliff by Republicans in an add again this cycle?  

8 hours ago, knapplc said:

 

Telling.

What’s telling?   Please enlighten us all with your wisdom.  Or maybe just let someone answer the question first before you spout off?  

8 hours ago, ColoradoHusk said:

You don't consider those people as dying as part of the Jan 6 attacks or you just didn't consider them initially?

I didn’t consider them initially, if they get honored sounds fine to me 
 

I guess I would have a question then about soldiers and other police officers not getting the same honor since suicide is a leading cause of death in those professions.  Should we have a yearly remembrance at the Capitol for all those who protected our country and died?  I would be for that too.  

6 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said:

There have been a handful of capitol police officers who have committed suicide in the past year, due to the physical and emotional trauma received during the attacks on 1/6/21. 

Thanks.  I don’t think about those people.  

1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said:

Psssat…..one is an elected official that the top people in the party support being in office. The other one isn’t.  
 

sort of a difference. 

If that’s the barometer, why are you still fixated on Trump?  What office does he hold again?  
 

MTG is no different than the squad in that they are all wacko pseudo racists with whacked out ideas, except people in the squad actually do hold leadership positions. 

3 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said:

I was able to read it just fine, and I don't subscribe. 

Every article I have read says only rioters died during the riot 

Just now, ColoradoHusk said:

I was able to read it just fine, and I don't subscribe. 

Well strange but I can’t.   It asks me to subscribe.  Maybe you could just let me know what police officers died in the riot 

56 minutes ago, ColoradoHusk said:

Here you go. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/05/us/politics/jan-6-capitol-deaths.html
 

 

Thanks but it’s behind a paywall. 

Is that our current Vice President agreeing that a duly elected President was illegitimately elected?   Hmmm….

57 minutes ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

What does India have to do with this?

Nothing that I know of 

1 hour ago, suh_fan93 said:

 

Hope he goes to jail for a long time, if he is guilty, but honestly what’s the point in having the picture be of him and Trump?   Kinda piss poor journalism.