-
Posts
17,022 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
17
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Media Demo
Posts posted by RedDenver
-
-
4 hours ago, brophog said:
Barring a scandal or similar, probably not. Due to all of the free media attention he gets, he's generated an enormous amount of value for the university.
Yep. CU has neither the money nor the desire to fire Deion. He did what they needed most - sold enough tickets to get the athletic dept out of the red. Winning is and was a distant second to that.
-
11 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:
The non competes I’m aware of are not like that. If the company fires you, it’s null and void. Also, you don’t have to start all over. You can still work in the industry and even call on some of your existing customers.
And, again, it’s very difficult to enforce. I don’t have a problem with this change.
I was laid-off and the non-compete was still in effect. I ended up changing industries due to it.
-
21 hours ago, Decked said:
Depending on how you want to disperse it amongst your scholarship guys. Right now we don’t have a ton of extremely valuable guys. The elite level players where you are spending big bucks on. Other than DR & maybe Banks. Keep in mind the roster is 100+. 85 scholarships. We have supposedly a pot of 10 million. The more elite players you have the more you’ll pay.
and please keep in mind it’s housing, food, clothes, books/tuition. And cars for guys too. It gets expensive fast.
I get what you're saying, but my point is that regardless of whether the official NCAA count has a guy on scholarship or not, we can still add scholarship guys to the roster using NIL money. It makes the distinction between scholarship and walk-on far less meaningful to the point where I'm not sure we as fans can make any meaningful distinction since we don't knowing what those players total compensation is.
-
3 hours ago, Decked said:
Yes. They don’t have the money to give many walk-ons the NIL treatment. Most of them aren’t good value.
Not sure I agree with that assumption. I think we have plenty of money to cover tuition for a bunch of guys.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Decked said:
Montana is D1 FCS. He did not have an FBS offer
This one screams NIL walk-on.
Does it matter whether he's on scholarship or not these days? The scholarships and NIL money can be shuffled around to make pretty much anything work now.
-
18 hours ago, Archy1221 said:
Holy false equivalency, Batman!
- 2
-
Makes sense
-
2 hours ago, Decked said:
Just don’t tell anyone about the little person that I paid to beat you up with that sock full of used butt plugs like you requested at the hotel.
- 1
-
Only a week - that's fast!
-
Put down weed and feed on the lawn.
-
3 hours ago, knapplc said:
Teach is promoting strawmen again. I know I'm shocked.
- 1
- 2
-
4 hours ago, Mavric said:
Saw the same hint. Really more of a just "the timing makes you wonder comment."
It's entirely possible he's gone. Rhule said again today he's "been out this week." So he's playing it really low-key if he's gone. But you never know.
Rhule said the doctor was keeping him out of practice.
-
7 hours ago, Mavric said:
Obviously not at Husker practice but here's what Carter Nelson has done in track this year:
11.03 100 meters
22.28 200 meters
54.85 400 meters
50-6 shot put
188-1 discus (top 20 nationally)
6-2 high jump
13-6 pole vault
22-7 long jump (leads class C)
The 400 and high jump aren't that impressive. As a former 7-0 high jumper, I'm sure the weight he has put on has limited his high jumping. I would guess he's mostly just jumped high enough to win.
But those are some pretty good marks across over half of the available individual events. And the sprint marks are pretty impressive for a guy that size.
Is Nelson still in HS or is this on the Nebraska track team?
-
6 hours ago, Archy1221 said:
Spitting fire.
Old, rich, white guy tends towards conservatism. News at 11.
- 1
-
10 hours ago, Gorillahawk said:
I honestly won't be surprised if the young QBs struggle against the defense in the spring game. Based on last year, the defense is light years ahead of the offense, and returns a lot of production. This offense might as well be in year one again because it won't look anything like it did when HH was QB1. I think the young guys will flash some real potential but overall have an underwhelming performance, which will send the fanbase into a spiral. I expect the offense to look more like a well oiled machine week 1 then it will in the spring game.
And really the year one offense was for Jeff Simms.
-
9 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:
Yeah….its interesting that I post a tweet from an actual expert explaining three ways it can happen and then explains why there is no evidence that it is happening in a wide scale systemic way. He picks out one short sentence and says, “see, he says it’s happening”. I then refer to the same tweet explaining again why there is no evidence it’s happening on a wide scale. And he comes back with, “well, you must not know what ballot harvesting is.”
Such an interesting way to carry on a conversation.
Yep
- 2
-
1 hour ago, Lorewarn said:
The f#&% are y'all even talking about anymore?
Archy thinks ballot harvesting is bad but can't explain why.
- 1
- 1
- 2
-
1 minute ago, JJ Husker said:
On this one very limited issue Archy is correct. States have different rules and limits. In Colorado, one person can deliver/turn in up to 10 ballots. Anyone the voter determines to deliver for them is okay. Nebraska has no specific rules. Other states limit this activity to only relatives or caregivers and some states have different numbers of ballots specified. I presume the laws are to prevent the illicit kind of ballot harvesting that some believe to be the reason that Republicans don’t actually win every election in a landslide.
I know there are different rules in different states. I'm asking Archy why there are rules against turning in ballots that are filled out by the voter.
-
2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:
So apparently you don’t actually know what ballot harvesting is.
ballot harvesting in a practical sense is going around to people who normally do not vote and who get mail in ballots. You got to those people who have not returned a ballot and ask them to vote and you will turn the ballot in for them. These people have no intention of voting till this process happened. In many states this isn’t legal if it isn’t a relative or if it gets past 4-5 ballots.
for some reason you keep talking about something else. Actually I probably know the reason and that’s to conflate the actual issue.
Why would it be illegal to turn in someone's ballot that they actually filled out?
-
2 hours ago, teachercd said:
I really think that defense will be nasty. In fact, I am betting UTEP ends up with under 50 yards rushing in the first game.
It might take a few games for the defense to hit their stride, so under 50 against UTEP is a bit optimistic I'd say, but certainly possible.
-
3 hours ago, Gage County said:
DB Coach Evan Cooper
Special Teams Coordinator Ed Foley
FYI, you posted the same video twice.
-
20 hours ago, gobiggergoredder said:
As a big fan of sarcasm, i apologize for missing that. Nice work sir.
No worries. I figured you either didn't see it or didn't know what it meant.
-
3 minutes ago, gobiggergoredder said:
A better fan would have realized it’s an improvement instead of a guy going out of bounds.
/s = sarcasm
- 1
-
23 hours ago, Moiraine said:
I feel like 75% of the people who hated it think that nothing on the island ever happened, even though it flat out says in the last episode that it all happened. I think the other 25% just don't like the Christiany ending.It was because during season 1 a bunch of fans guessed the ending (which I won't spoil for anyone) and the producers stated that it wasn't. So a lot of people were confused/annoyed because they lied about what was happening. Plus when they get off the island but then have to go back really was terrible writing, which was when I stopped watching.
Economy
in Politics & Religion
Posted
Almost certainly true. But having just been laid off, I couldn't take the chance on the legal costs.