Jump to content


Landlord

Banned
  • Posts

    21,077
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    94

Posts posted by Landlord

  1. 23 hours ago, Huskers93-97 said:

    someone was comparing us to some other countries who have had way less deaths and infections than the US. How many countries in the world have a population that even remotely compares to the US.

     

    Deaths/infections per capita my dude. That means that the numbers are adjusted to control for population size. 

     

     

     

    16 hours ago, Huskers93-97 said:

    Are they testing at the same rate we are? Positive tests if we are testing at a much higher rate doesn’t say much other than we are executing more tests. Does that mean we actually are doing worse at containing it? Or is it possible they are just testing less 

     

    You know our President has been trying for months to get us to test less, right? Also that our testing numbers per capita have caught up a good amount but spent way too much time wayyyyyy behind.

     

    In March the US had ONE corona virus test per every 1,000,000 people. South Korea had 2,000 tests per every 1m. Italy had 386. Switzerland 214, UK 199, etc. We had one.

    • Plus1 2
  2. On 6/11/2020 at 10:25 AM, 84HuskerLaw said:

    why not write about the kid’s talents instead of his shortcomings.

     

     

     

    What.

     

    The.

     

    f#&%.

     

    Are you talking about?

     

    "QB commit Heinrich Haarberg is a sponge when it comes to learning"

     

     

    This is a compliment. It's writing about his talent.

    • Plus1 1
  3. Reality is, there are some things about motivation that are involuntary and subconscious. For all of us. 

     

    When we ran track, occasionally we would run 200's in practice and our coach would get us to really treat them like the real deal, but we'd always run them faster if we had someone the same speed next to us than if we ran next to someone clearly slower or faster.

     

    AM had no real competition and he had a lot of 'savior praise' from his coach, the media, and the fans his sophomore year. Optimism was sky high, we ended his freshman year on a huge momentum run, and the hype and mood were unbelievably positive.

     

    Even if he's the most mentally determined player on the team, that will still have some kind of involuntary effect on your drive. That's not really an excuse, but rather an argument that we shouldn't (yet, at least) be overly worried about this imo.

    • Plus1 5
    • Fire 1
  4. • Regressed offensive line

    • Unpredictable snaps

    • Loss of receiving corps

    • No drive of competition

    • Injury

     

    That's a bad 5 factor combo of performance degradation. If he stays healthy I think he'll rebound in a big way, assuming the pieces around him take another step as well.

    • Plus1 5
    • Thanks 1
    • Fire 1
  5. 1 hour ago, teachercd said:

    Yeah, I guess UA hurting.  It seemed like they had made all the right moves from when they started until now but I guess they have made some poor choices. 

     

     

    They spread themselves too thin and they've completely, 100% missed out on the renaissance of urban streetwear culture that Nike and Adidas have been crushing. Plus they haven't  been able to successfully capitalize on any of their big celebrity endorsements.

     

    As much grief as I've given Adidas over the years, they've really turned it up over the last 5-6 years. 

    • Plus1 2
  6. 3 hours ago, Blackshirt316 said:

     

    Oklahoma hasn't won a National Title in 20 years.

    Notre Dame hasn't won a National Title since 1988

    Penn State hasn't won a National Title since 1989 - when they were still independant.

    Georgia hasn't won a National Title since 1980

    Michigan hasn't won a National Title since 1948. 

     

    All of them were bad until they got a good coach and then they weren't.

     

    Players go where the programs invest in them. Nebraska invests in the players as much as anyone. We will get talent. Gotta have a staff who can evaluate and coach it.

     

     

     

    Oklahoma has made the playoffs four times, and has won 13 conference championships in 20 years.

    Notre Dame has made  the national championship and playoff in the last 10 years.

    Penn State has a conference championship and 3 NY6 bowl appearances in the last 5 years.

    Georgia has made one national championship game, and won the SEC in the last 5 years.

    Michigan won a national championship in 1997 lol

     

    All of them outrecruit the hell out of us, none of them have had 20 year stretches like we've had, and your selective critique of the post you quoted misses the point.

    • Plus1 1
  7. 3 minutes ago, Moiraine said:

     

    No it isn't.

     

    In one scenario they completely made this whole thing up for the attention.

    In the other they thought something had been put in their drinks and then it was discovered later to have not been done on purpose. Kind of like the Nascar driver who found the "noose" in his garage.

     

     

    In one scenario they completely made this whole thing up for the attention.

     

    In the other, they had bad but non-harmful milkshakes that got dumped and replaced, and then they completely made this whole thing up for the attention.

     

     

     

    y'all are ignoring the key factor here that the officers didn't get sick but the NYPD said that they were poisoned and got sick.

  8. 8 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

    Because there was some speculation that there may have not been anything wrong with the drink even.  That would put the guilt on the officers.

     

     

    I must be missing something about the point being made still because the guilt is still put on the officers the exact same amount.

  9. 2 hours ago, DevoHusker said:

    My only point was, that at the start, there was a taste of bleach/cleaning solution in their drinks. It was accidently there, but it was there nonetheless. The 3 cops did not start out their day by deciding they were going to ruin Shake Shack with BS claims of poisoning....

     

     

    This is true but...

     

    who cares? Why is it a 'point' you made?

  10. 4 hours ago, DevoHusker said:

    But it does matter. They lied. But their lie was based on the fact that they tasted cleaning solution in their drinks. They didn't wake up that morning and say "let's f&ck with Shake Shack today." 

     

     

    What's the real difference between

     

    "Hey our drinks taste a little funny, thanks for fixing them and getting us new ones. Let's lie about being poisoned and getting sick from this."

     

    vs

     

    "Hey shake shack hasn't done anything wrong at all and these smoothes taste good. Let's lie about being poisoned and getting sick from this."

    • Plus1 1
  11. 22 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

    btw Obama-Biden continued and accelerated the Bush policy of using predator drones to incinerate suspected terrorists, without any due process or much concern for civilians in the radius.

     

     

    btw Trump continued and accelerated the Obama policy of using predator drones to incinerate suspected terrorists, without any due process or much concern for civilians in the radius.

    • Plus1 1
  12. 10 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said:

    Very few never-Trumpers can acknowledge that President Trump has been consistent in his foreign policy of no more endless wars and fewer foreign entanglements. I've had plenty of Ds who either cannot or will not see that Trump's policy is nothing like either President Bush.

     

     

    I would agree with you except that you're omitting how many tens of thousands of innocent civilians he's killed with drone strikes, assassinating that foreign general, and abandoning the Kurds to slaughter.

  13. 9 hours ago, BlitzFirst said:

     

    We're talking about two different points in time in this thread with two different outcomes of the conversation.

     

    I didn't mention my percentage (which obviously was a guess and not a fact) until recently.  I mentioned my definition of what a bad cop was near the beginning of this thread.

     

    Once again, you were part of both conversations...so why are you acting like you don't understand the passage of time and different conversations?

     

     

    Because I never saw anyone disagree with your assertion that cops who see other cops do bad stuff and say nothing are also bad cops.

×
×
  • Create New...